Page 40 of 94

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Mon October 28, 2013 1:27 pm
by stip
on my second listen through this thing. Made it to normal people before I got to work. Still love Reflektor. Can't get into the other stuff. Parts of normal people remind me of the 'out of my mind' improv/partial song

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Mon October 28, 2013 8:08 pm
by zeb
Top tens right now?

No Cars Go
Wake Up
The Suburbs
Here Comes The Night Time
Porno
It's Never Over
Ready To Start
Sprawl II
Black Mirror
We Exist

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Mon October 28, 2013 10:06 pm
by Soma.
Good list. Give me "Orpheus" over "Porno" and I could live with it.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Tue October 29, 2013 1:49 am
by HardTI
Man like 6 spins in this album and I still don't understand it. I should love it, and probably will. It's almost like there's too much going on in every god damn song.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Tue October 29, 2013 1:55 am
by Soma.
Every single AF album has leapt out at me immediately. They're the band that snapped me out of my blind hatred and subsequent dismissal of indie music as being little more than a fashion statement. I owe a lot to them for that.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Tue October 29, 2013 3:25 am
by VinylGuy
second listen....its good. Its maybe too long, but there are some good, interesting things here.

My favs are Reflektor, Porno and Here comes the night time 2.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Tue October 29, 2013 12:30 pm
by Bob Loblaw
Porno is tits.

Sweet, soft, juicy, boner-wetting tits.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Tue October 29, 2013 1:18 pm
by stip
finished my second listen.


This album is like a christmas tree that is about to collapse under the weight of all the ornaments decorating it. Some songs are potentially quite good but are buried underneath the excess, and other songs are basically platforms for the excess with little underneath them. I am not finding much in many of these songs to really grasp onto--they seem like exercises in self-indulgence, without being concerned about being moving, or engaging. And the songs I want to like have a few too many moments that distract me just as I'm starting to get drawn in.

I still really like Refklektor, which is the most successful fusion of excess and strong songwriting. I really want to like Hey Orpheus (i forget the actual title of that one), and there are a lot of really great parts to it, but damn if that HEY ORPHEUS part just makes me actually want to cringe. For real. And afterlife is mostly pretty decent.

I probably like this the least of their 4 records. I want to give this one more try, though

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Tue October 29, 2013 1:30 pm
by Soma.
You still like Pearl Jam, thus I can't take anything you say seriously. Sorry. I wish it were different.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Tue October 29, 2013 1:34 pm
by Bob Loblaw
Sorry stip, but the fact that you take PJ's post-2000 output seriously makes it hard for me to give your opinion too much weight.

This is the best Arcade Fire album yet.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Tue October 29, 2013 1:42 pm
by Soma.
Great minds and all that. Rafa knows.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Tue October 29, 2013 1:43 pm
by Bob Loblaw
Soma. wrote:Great minds and all that. Rafa knows.
:ohyeah!:

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Tue October 29, 2013 1:49 pm
by VinylGuy
stip wrote:finished my second listen.


This album is like a christmas tree that is about to collapse under the weight of all the ornaments decorating it. Some songs are potentially quite good but are buried underneath the excess, and other songs are basically platforms for the excess with little underneath them. I am not finding much in many of these songs to really grasp onto--they seem like exercises in self-indulgence, without being concerned about being moving, or engaging. And the songs I want to like have a few too many moments that distract me just as I'm starting to get drawn in.

I still really like Refklektor, which is the most successful fusion of excess and strong songwriting. I really want to like Hey Orpheus (i forget the actual title of that one), and there are a lot of really great parts to it, but damn if that HEY ORPHEUS part just makes me actually want to cringe. For real. And afterlife is mostly pretty decent.

I probably like this the least of their 4 records. I want to give this one more try, though
This is a great post guys...Stip is right, even if i like the album, the production is trying too hard to be noticed.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Tue October 29, 2013 2:48 pm
by evenslow
This is wonderful.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle ... story.html
Look, I’m sure they’re very nice people, but on their fourth album, “Reflektor,” Arcade Fire still sound like gigantic dorks with boring sex lives.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Tue October 29, 2013 3:04 pm
by harmless
stip wrote:I really want to like Hey Orpheus (i forget the actual title of that one), and there are a lot of really great parts to it, but damn if that HEY ORPHEUS part just makes me actually want to cringe.
Oh stip. I'm not sure you realise the magnitude of what you've just done.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Tue October 29, 2013 3:07 pm
by VinylGuy
evenslow wrote:This is wonderful.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle ... story.html
Look, I’m sure they’re very nice people, but on their fourth album, “Reflektor,” Arcade Fire still sound like gigantic dorks with boring sex lives.
Even if i like the album, i agree with this view.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Tue October 29, 2013 3:08 pm
by Jorge
evenslow wrote:This is wonderful.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle ... story.html
Look, I’m sure they’re very nice people, but on their fourth album, “Reflektor,” Arcade Fire still sound like gigantic dorks with boring sex lives.
Aw. That's just unnecessary.

Still haven't listened to this. I like "Reflektor", the single, a whole lot. The internet's abuzz with debate about the album, though, which is usually a good sign.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Tue October 29, 2013 3:13 pm
by harmless
So this review criticises the album for being too hipster and show-offy, but also "unstylish", and written by people with boring sex lives? It sounds like this writer might have double standards.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Tue October 29, 2013 3:27 pm
by Bob Loblaw
Looks like he'd be largely appeased just by telling him this is not rock-and-roll. Which it isn't.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Tue October 29, 2013 3:28 pm
by VinylGuy
relax guys, David Fricke gave the album 4 and half stars.


That guy is worse than Pitchfork.