Red Mosquito

lol now Trump is saying the House should vote to release the files. What are the chances they haven't been tampered with?

Anders wrote:

Jorge wrote:

Anders wrote:MTG is worse than Trump. Her as president would be even more insane.

Like the difference between eating dirt for dinner, vs eating shit for dinner.

She's better than Trump on Israel, foreign involvement and military spending. And, it would seem, covering up powerful pedophiles for political leverage

I believe she has a history of anti-semitic remarks, which would make her a terrible president on Israel. She is against supporting Ukraine with weapons, which would make her a terrible president on foreign involvement and military spending. She is a conspiracy theorist/qanon supporter, so who knows how that would go with accusations of her opponents being pedophiles. She repeatedly indicated support for executing prominent Democratic politicians in 2018 and 2019.

The question isn't whether she would be a "good" president on these issues.

Jorge wrote:

Anders wrote:

Jorge wrote:

Anders wrote:MTG is worse than Trump. Her as president would be even more insane.

Like the difference between eating dirt for dinner, vs eating shit for dinner.

She's better than Trump on Israel, foreign involvement and military spending. And, it would seem, covering up powerful pedophiles for political leverage

I believe she has a history of anti-semitic remarks, which would make her a terrible president on Israel. She is against supporting Ukraine with weapons, which would make her a terrible president on foreign involvement and military spending. She is a conspiracy theorist/qanon supporter, so who knows how that would go with accusations of her opponents being pedophiles. She repeatedly indicated support for executing prominent Democratic politicians in 2018 and 2019.

The question isn't whether she would be a "good" president on these issues.

I did write about her as president in my original post.

She is probably the worst member in congress. Although I do not have full knowledge of all of them.

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:lol now Trump is saying the House should vote to release the files. What are the chances they haven't been tampered with?

He could just release them, though. Since when has law or regulation stopped him with anything else. He's doing this so he can "look good", then say that they can't release them due to the ongoing investigation (that he just ordered)

I know some people are saying it is stalling so he can scrub the files, but they've had them long enough that if that were the case they'd have done that already.

I'm really surprised they haven't been leaked by someone already.

Anders wrote:

Jorge wrote:

Anders wrote:

Jorge wrote:

Anders wrote:MTG is worse than Trump. Her as president would be even more insane.

Like the difference between eating dirt for dinner, vs eating shit for dinner.

She's better than Trump on Israel, foreign involvement and military spending. And, it would seem, covering up powerful pedophiles for political leverage

I believe she has a history of anti-semitic remarks, which would make her a terrible president on Israel. She is against supporting Ukraine with weapons, which would make her a terrible president on foreign involvement and military spending. She is a conspiracy theorist/qanon supporter, so who knows how that would go with accusations of her opponents being pedophiles. She repeatedly indicated support for executing prominent Democratic politicians in 2018 and 2019.

The question isn't whether she would be a "good" president on these issues.

I did write about her as president in my original post.

Right, but that’s exactly why I keep stressing the relative comparison. I’m not arguing that she’d be "good" on any of these issues in an absolute sense. I’m saying that on these specific topics she’s better than Trump, which is a different question. Take Israel: her position may come from a bizarre and bigoted place, but the practical outcome (less automatic US support and less blank-check backing for the Israeli government) is still preferable to Trump's openly pro-Netanyahu, pro-settlement, no-limits stance (she's better than the Democrats on this issue too). The same goes for foreign involvement and military spending: she’s an isolationist crank but the end result (less intervention, less funding for overseas conflicts) is still closer to good than what we're seeing with Trump 2.0.

Don’t agree with any of your points, but especially less support for Ukraine would be absolutely disastrous.

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:lol now Trump is saying the House should vote to release the files. What are the chances they haven't been tampered with?

He could just release them, though. Since when has law or regulation stopped him with anything else. He's doing this so he can "look good", then say that they can't release them due to the ongoing investigation (that he just ordered)

I know some people are saying it is stalling so he can scrub the files, but they've had them long enough that if that were the case they'd have done that already.

I'm really surprised they haven't been leaked by someone already.

Time to find out if boinking kids is where MAGA draws the line.

Spoiler alert…

Spoiler: show

It won’t be.

spike wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:lol now Trump is saying the House should vote to release the files. What are the chances they haven't been tampered with?

He could just release them, though. Since when has law or regulation stopped him with anything else. He's doing this so he can "look good", then say that they can't release them due to the ongoing investigation (that he just ordered)

I know some people are saying it is stalling so he can scrub the files, but they've had them long enough that if that were the case they'd have done that already.

I'm really surprised they haven't been leaked by someone already.

Time to find out if boinking kids is where MAGA draws the line.

Spoiler alert…

Spoiler: show

It won’t be.

it’s already starting.

dad wrote:

spike wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:lol now Trump is saying the House should vote to release the files. What are the chances they haven't been tampered with?

He could just release them, though. Since when has law or regulation stopped him with anything else. He's doing this so he can "look good", then say that they can't release them due to the ongoing investigation (that he just ordered)

I know some people are saying it is stalling so he can scrub the files, but they've had them long enough that if that were the case they'd have done that already.

I'm really surprised they haven't been leaked by someone already.

Time to find out if boinking kids is where MAGA draws the line.

Spoiler alert…

Spoiler: show

It won’t be.

it’s already starting.

I read earlier today that the proposed legislation would make the Justice Department release all unclassified pieces of the report. So all he has to do is just make all of it classified then no one sees anything.

But, if he doesn’t do that it will be so heavily redacted only democrats that may be on the list will be revealed.

someone should create a bot that replies to trumps truth social posts, and it should be, “quiet, piggy.”

wease wrote:

dad wrote:

spike wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:lol now Trump is saying the House should vote to release the files. What are the chances they haven't been tampered with?

He could just release them, though. Since when has law or regulation stopped him with anything else. He's doing this so he can "look good", then say that they can't release them due to the ongoing investigation (that he just ordered)

I know some people are saying it is stalling so he can scrub the files, but they've had them long enough that if that were the case they'd have done that already.

I'm really surprised they haven't been leaked by someone already.

Time to find out if boinking kids is where MAGA draws the line.

Spoiler alert…

Spoiler: show

It won’t be.

it’s already starting.

I read earlier today that the proposed legislation would make the Justice Department release all unclassified pieces of the report. So all he has to do is just make all of it classified then no one sees anything.

But, if he doesn’t do that it will be so heavily redacted only democrats that may be on the list will be revealed.

I havent gone back to read any of previous replies so sorry if i B this

perhaps the reason that he ordered pam to investigate bill and others is because once it is under investigation all evidence is sealed therefor cannot be released to the public

Brave Clay Higgins (R-LA), the only no vote on the Epstein files.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/clay-higgi ... ouse-vote/

It has been zero (0) days since the president both-sided the murder of Jamal Khashoggi. Reset the clock.

Simple Torture wrote:It has been zero (0) days since the president both-sided the murder of Jamal Khashoggi. Reset the clock.

Guys, Khashoggi could have been mean to dogs. Do you know he wasn't?

B wrote:

Simple Torture wrote:It has been zero (0) days since the president both-sided the murder of Jamal Khashoggi. Reset the clock.

Guys, Khashoggi could have been mean to dogs. Do you know he wasn't?

This is the most RM argument of all time.

Are we sure RM isn't a Trump propaganda mouthpiece?

Are you missing the sarcasm?

B wrote:Are you missing the sarcasm?

I don't think he missed it but doubling down on it is quite unfunny and very RMeta.

Spoiler: show

Someone needs to propose a bill allowing the press corps to punch this bully in the face when warranted without secret service intervention.

while he was berating that reporter, he said he threw Epstein out of mar a lago because of the guy was “a pervert,” which is really rich coming from the guy who said grab ‘em by the pussy, on a hot mic, and oh…*checks notes*…spoke of his own daughter in a way that would lead one to believe he would fuck her.

And none of that is going to sink in for his little followers because they are morons. morons who are already trying to justify raping children.

B wrote:Are you missing the sarcasm?

Umm... Huh?

I thought I was yes-anding the sarcasm but it's RM so maybe I'm wrong?