Red Mosquito

Posted: **Fri November 03, 2017 5:38 pm**

Wowzers.

https://www.apnews.com/dea73efc01594839 ... %27-emails

Posted: **Fri November 03, 2017 5:42 pm**

All three leak-branded sites have distanced themselves from Moscow. DCLeaks claimed to be run by American hacktivists. WikiLeaks said Russia wasn’t its source. Guccifer 2.0 claimed to be Romanian.

But there were signs of dishonesty from the start. The first document Guccifer 2.0 published on June 15 came not from the DNC as advertised but from Podesta’s inbox, according to a former DNC official who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the press.

The official said the word “CONFIDENTIAL” was not in the original document.

Guccifer 2.0 had airbrushed it to catch reporters’ attention.

Posted: **Fri November 03, 2017 6:35 pm**

Federal judge orders that the trial of ex-Trump aides Paul Manafort and Rick Gates "will commence on May 7, 2018 at 9:30 a.m."

Posted: **Fri November 03, 2017 7:01 pm**

McParadigm wrote:Federal judge orders that the trial of ex-Trump aides Paul Manafort and Rick Gates "will commence on May 7, 2018 at 9:30 a.m."

They’ll either be pardoned or out of the country by then.

Posted: **Fri November 03, 2017 7:14 pm**

I just got my paycheck. Where is my tax cut? man.

Posted: **Fri November 03, 2017 7:16 pm**

As I mentioned a few pages back.

Posted: **Fri November 03, 2017 7:21 pm**

McParadigm wrote:As I mentioned a few pages back.

Don't you have to ... y'know ... have a name to go on the account?

Posted: **Fri November 03, 2017 7:45 pm**

B wrote:
McParadigm wrote:As I mentioned a few pages back.
Don't you have to ... y'know ... have a name to go on the account?

Apparently no, according to that article:

"The language doesn't represent a change to existing law, as prospective parents can already open the accounts even before they conceive."

Posted: **Fri November 03, 2017 8:53 pm**

Bi_3 wrote:
B wrote:
McParadigm wrote:As I mentioned a few pages back.
Don't you have to ... y'know ... have a name to go on the account?

Apparently no, according to that article:

"The language doesn't represent a change to existing law, as prospective parents can already open the accounts even before they conceive."

So, this is, what? Just a sneaky way of trying to establish personhood?

Posted: **Fri November 03, 2017 8:57 pm**

B wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
B wrote:
McParadigm wrote:As I mentioned a few pages back.
Don't you have to ... y'know ... have a name to go on the account?

Apparently no, according to that article:

"The language doesn't represent a change to existing law, as prospective parents can already open the accounts even before they conceive."
So, this is, what? Just a sneaky way of trying to establish personhood?

Of course. You can’t abort something with a college fund.

Posted: **Fri November 03, 2017 9:02 pm**

wease wrote:
B wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
B wrote:
McParadigm wrote:As I mentioned a few pages back.
Don't you have to ... y'know ... have a name to go on the account?

Apparently no, according to that article:

"The language doesn't represent a change to existing law, as prospective parents can already open the accounts even before they conceive."
So, this is, what? Just a sneaky way of trying to establish personhood?
Of course. You can’t abort something with a college fund.

Watch me!

Posted: **Fri November 03, 2017 9:29 pm**

B wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
B wrote:
McParadigm wrote:As I mentioned a few pages back.
Don't you have to ... y'know ... have a name to go on the account?

Apparently no, according to that article:

"The language doesn't represent a change to existing law, as prospective parents can already open the accounts even before they conceive."
So, this is, what? Just a sneaky way of trying to establish personhood?

It sounds like something the pro lifers can grab on to as the tax reform bill rips up their retirements

Posted: **Fri November 03, 2017 9:53 pm**

I actually agree with a Trump tweet, ugh. Bergdahl not getting jail is bullshit

Posted: **Fri November 03, 2017 10:07 pm**

Bi_3 wrote:
B wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
B wrote:
McParadigm wrote:As I mentioned a few pages back.
Don't you have to ... y'know ... have a name to go on the account?

Apparently no, according to that article:

"The language doesn't represent a change to existing law, as prospective parents can already open the accounts even before they conceive."
So, this is, what? Just a sneaky way of trying to establish personhood?
It sounds like something the pro lifers can grab on to as the tax reform bill rips up their retirements

Maybe. It contains language nearly identical to the state personhood laws that were shot down in several places. And here's the thing: you can already set up a 529 prior to birth. You're allowed to set it up in your own name and then transfer it to the child. Benefits are the same as in the new tax bill. So...no change except "unborn baby is defined as...."

I don't know enough to know what the possible legal implications might be for establishing personhood here, as opposed to in anti-abortion legislation...but if it's a bone for pro-lifers, they've sure not been tooting that horn too loudly.

Posted: **Fri November 03, 2017 10:45 pm**

years from now, after Trump is jailed / exiled / bankrupted, but has continued to live in denial throughout, he will look back on this time and be filled with sorrow as he finally accepts his fate as just, for having committed the most inexcusable crime of all:

Spoiler: show: low ratings

Posted: **Fri November 03, 2017 10:49 pm**

E.H. Ruddock wrote:I actually agree with a Trump tweet, ugh. Bergdahl not getting jail is bullshit

He's suffered enough already. Any punishment he deserves, he's gotten it already

Posted: **Fri November 03, 2017 10:56 pm**

The Argonaut wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I actually agree with a Trump tweet, ugh. Bergdahl not getting jail is bullshit
He's suffered enough already. Any punishment he deserves, he's gotten it already

Apparently, people are really, really pissed. I can see people thinking he deserves punishment from the US government, but given how much he suffered, how mad can you really get?

Posted: **Fri November 03, 2017 11:01 pm**

B wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I actually agree with a Trump tweet, ugh. Bergdahl not getting jail is bullshit
He's suffered enough already. Any punishment he deserves, he's gotten it already
Apparently, people are really, really pissed. I can see people thinking he deserves punishment from the US government, but given how much he suffered, how mad can you really get?

Pretty, pretty, pretty, pretty mad.

Posted: **Fri November 03, 2017 11:01 pm**

i’d imagine that, after the months of gritty agony, it might be therapeutic to the american population to see both trump and hillary convicted for their respective transgressions. no doubt trump conspired with russians and sexually assaulted women; and no doubt hillbot ran a pay-to-play racket with her foundation while in the state department and colluded with the DNC to fuck over bernie/progressives.

then maybe americans can move on from these two pieces of garbage

Spoiler: show: and go all-in on two even less-skilled pieces of hot garbage

Posted: **Fri November 03, 2017 11:05 pm**

Bi_3 wrote:
B wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I actually agree with a Trump tweet, ugh. Bergdahl not getting jail is bullshit
He's suffered enough already. Any punishment he deserves, he's gotten it already
Apparently, people are really, really pissed. I can see people thinking he deserves punishment from the US government, but given how much he suffered, how mad can you really get?
Pretty, pretty, pretty, pretty mad.

And Trump's mindless tweeting helped make it possible.

Red Mosquito

The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Re: The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Re: The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Re: The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Re: The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Re: The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Re: The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Re: The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Re: The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Re: The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Re: The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Re: The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Re: The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Re: The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Re: The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Re: The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Re: The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Re: The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Re: The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Re: The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Re: The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump