Page 5 of 33

Re: Bombs in Boston

Posted: Mon April 15, 2013 10:41 pm
by @SkitchP
It should be illegal to kill an 8 year old with a bomb

Re: Bombs in Boston

Posted: Mon April 15, 2013 10:43 pm
by BurtReynolds
i cant deal with this kinda shit on a monday.

Re: Bombs in Boston

Posted: Mon April 15, 2013 10:46 pm
by shinkdew
Boston police are talking to a Saudi national who denies any involvement. He was seen running from the area and tackled by a civilian.

Re: Bombs in Boston

Posted: Mon April 15, 2013 10:47 pm
by Norah
CBS's John Miller and BPD's Ed Davis are saying different things. CBS tends to be pretty solid too, unless it's Dan Rather doing Bush story.

Re: Bombs in Boston

Posted: Mon April 15, 2013 10:49 pm
by TheDapperGent
Isn't about time we talk about bomb control in this country. /s

Re: Bombs in Boston

Posted: Mon April 15, 2013 10:50 pm
by Simple Torture
shinkdew wrote:Boston police are talking to a Saudi national who denies any involvement. He was seen running from the area and tackled by a civilian.
This makes me uncomfortable, to say the least.

Re: Bombs in Boston

Posted: Mon April 15, 2013 10:50 pm
by LetMeSleep
shinkdew wrote:Boston police are talking to a Saudi national who denies any involvement. He was seen running from the area and tackled by a civilian.
Footage shows lots of white people running away too. Gotta stick with facts in these situations.

The media here in Australia have said a few debatable things too. Man I hate irresponsible and emotive journalism.

Re: Bombs in Boston

Posted: Mon April 15, 2013 10:55 pm
by Norah
Aussie reporters haven't stopped calling us all afternoon. The boss finally told us to stop taking their calls.

Re: Bombs in Boston

Posted: Mon April 15, 2013 11:00 pm
by dkfan9
cutuphalfdead wrote:BPD says reports of a suspect being guarded at a hospital are untrue.
is this semantics, though? a "person of interest" is not necessarily a "suspect"

Re: Bombs in Boston

Posted: Mon April 15, 2013 11:02 pm
by Norah
dkfan9 wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:BPD says reports of a suspect being guarded at a hospital are untrue.
is this semantics, though? a "person of interest" is not necessarily a "suspect"
Yeah, but when it was just the NY Post saying it I brushed it off as bullshit completely.

Re: Bombs in Boston

Posted: Mon April 15, 2013 11:03 pm
by @SkitchP
What does this even mean?

Re: Bombs in Boston

Posted: Mon April 15, 2013 11:06 pm
by Simple Torture
I've already seen similar things on FB, featuring caricatures of all the Boston sports mascots. It's just not a response I understand.

Re: Bombs in Boston

Posted: Mon April 15, 2013 11:07 pm
by McParadigm
shinkdew wrote:Boston police are talking to a Saudi national who denies any involvement. He was seen running from the area and tackled by a civilian.
I.....

ahhh......
What does this even mean?
More importantly, which city IS the right one to mess with? I'm assuming Detroit.

Re: Bombs in Boston

Posted: Mon April 15, 2013 11:07 pm
by Self
@SkitchP wrote:What does this even mean?

Re: Bombs in Boston

Posted: Mon April 15, 2013 11:10 pm
by @SkitchP
jesus self.. spoiler that shit. or something.

Re: Bombs in Boston

Posted: Mon April 15, 2013 11:10 pm
by LetMeSleep
cutuphalfdead wrote:Aussie reporters haven't stopped calling us all afternoon. The boss finally told us to stop taking their calls.
I think they'll think twice about calling hospitals though.

It just doesn't help. Let the city, it's services and media get on with the ongoing situation and take what ever info is given to you. And don't speculate. Rolling news is a virus.

Re: Bombs in Boston

Posted: Mon April 15, 2013 11:11 pm
by Simple Torture
cutuphalfdead wrote:Aussie reporters haven't stopped calling us all afternoon. The boss finally told us to stop taking their calls.
Ask them which way their toilets flush!

Re: Bombs in Boston

Posted: Mon April 15, 2013 11:12 pm
by Self
@SkitchP wrote:jesus self.. spoiler that shit. or something.
Broken Iris ruined the spoiler tag for me. Swore I'd never use it again.

Re: Bombs in Boston

Posted: Mon April 15, 2013 11:13 pm
by Norah
Simple Torture wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:Aussie reporters haven't stopped calling us all afternoon. The boss finally told us to stop taking their calls.
Ask them which way their toilets flush!
I was too distracted by their incredibly sexy accents.

Re: Bombs in Boston

Posted: Mon April 15, 2013 11:14 pm
by Birds in Hell
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:Aussie reporters haven't stopped calling us all afternoon. The boss finally told us to stop taking their calls.
Ask them which way their toilets flush!
I was too distracted by their incredibly sexy accents.
"Eh, mates! What's the good word?"