Red Mosquito

BurtReynolds wrote:I have another friend who is convinced Sandra Bullock is a man. She is the jealous sort.

I always thought she looked similar to Michael Jackson.

the story was cool n all, but i was all in awe with the space visuals most of the time.. i thought the 3d made this.. i dont think it would be as good on my living room tv.. felt like i was floatin out there too..

also i never even thought of....

VinylGuy wrote:about the ending.

Spoiler: show

i got all this rebirth thing, with her in space looking like a fetus and then when she comes out fro the water and cant walk right...but to me there are some weird things there too...maybe is just her own dream? she arrives at this weird place on earth that looks like paradise...is she dead?

shit, possibly

i got bugs wrote:the story was cool n all, but i was all in awe with the space visuals most of the time.. i thought the 3d made this.. i dont think it would be as good on my living room tv.. felt like i was floatin out there too..

also i never even thought of....

VinylGuy wrote:about the ending.

Spoiler: show

i got all this rebirth thing, with her in space looking like a fetus and then when she comes out fro the water and cant walk right...but to me there are some weird things there too...maybe is just her own dream? she arrives at this weird place on earth that looks like paradise...is she dead?

shit, possibly

Spoiler: show

I just thought it was weird to see that last shot of her and that paradise looking place.

Ruddo won this thread.

On the other hand, I'm more confused than ever regarding what exactly a chick-flick is.

this didn't blow my mind

A must see in Imax 3D> otherwise it will suck

A "chick flick" is a very specific thing that has nothing to do with this movie. You don't really know what you're talking about snd.

Dev wrote:this didn't blow my mind

I was waiting for this exact response from you.

Is this movie worth seeing in 3D? Or just a regular cinema?

I've never watched a 3D movie before, it should be interesting but I've heard some people say that 3D ruins some movies, or is just pointless.

Sgt. Crackpot wrote:Is this movie worth seeing in 3D? Or just a regular cinema?

I've never watched a 3D movie before, it should be interesting but I've heard some people say that 3D ruins some movies, or is just pointless.

It's very rare that 3D will actually enhance my enjoyment of a movie; in most cases, it just makes the image appear smaller and darker, with the tiny bit of added depth feeling like a tawdry gimmick. But this is an example of a movie I very much enjoyed in 3D. Coupled with the camera work, it makes for a very cool storytelling device, and helps make some sequences all the more breathless and exciting. Definitely a worthy movie to pop your 3D cherry, but don't get your hopes up about the format: most of them suck.

Sgt. Crackpot wrote:Is this movie worth seeing in 3D? Or just a regular cinema?

I've never watched a 3D movie before, it should be interesting but I've heard some people say that 3D ruins some movies, or is just pointless.

Imax. The only way to see this movie properly.

theplatypus wrote:

Sgt. Crackpot wrote:Is this movie worth seeing in 3D? Or just a regular cinema?

I've never watched a 3D movie before, it should be interesting but I've heard some people say that 3D ruins some movies, or is just pointless.

It's very rare that 3D will actually enhance my enjoyment of a movie; in most cases, it just makes the image appear smaller and darker, with the tiny bit of added depth feeling like a tawdry gimmick. But this is an example of a movie I very much enjoyed in 3D. Coupled with the camera work, it makes for a very cool storytelling device, and helps make some sequences all the more breathless and exciting. Definitely a worthy movie to pop your 3D cherry, but don't get your hopes up about the format: most of them suck.

That helps sell me on 3D for this movie, thanks. I generally hate the format.

theplatypus wrote:

Sgt. Crackpot wrote:Is this movie worth seeing in 3D? Or just a regular cinema?

I've never watched a 3D movie before, it should be interesting but I've heard some people say that 3D ruins some movies, or is just pointless.

It's very rare that 3D will actually enhance my enjoyment of a movie; in most cases, it just makes the image appear smaller and darker, with the tiny bit of added depth feeling like a tawdry gimmick. But this is an example of a movie I very much enjoyed in 3D. Coupled with the camera work, it makes for a very cool storytelling device, and helps make some sequences all the more breathless and exciting. Definitely a worthy movie to pop your 3D cherry, but don't get your hopes up about the format: most of them suck.

Thanks Jorge.

I was completely underwhelmed with the only other 3D movie I've seen (Avatar) but Gravity in 3D on IMAX was incredible.

Awesome movie. I was straight up on the verge of tears throughout. The science of it, does not really compute, but it still works. It felt like it was four hours long, but in a good way.

Harry Lime wrote:

Dev wrote:this didn't blow my mind

I was waiting for this exact response from you.

lol

Total chick flick.

Theodore Bundy wrote:Total chick flick.

Some chicks want to be astronauts.

So I just watched this in 3D. Is it a Planet of the Apes prequel?

Rather eat a shit sandwich than watch anything with Sandra Bollox in it but the effects were cool even though as usual the 3D specs made everything too dark, robbing everything of its full effect.

Really wanted to like this but overall it sucked apart from effects.

Gonna watch Moon now to block it out.