Page 5 of 24
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 04, 2015 8:49 pm
by Lament
BigRedLedbetter wrote:I love this White Sox hat.

Random fact: That identity marked one of only four seasons since 1909 where the White Sox didn't wear either a hat or jersey that simply read "SOX" on it (1942, 1987-1989). The urban legend was that the Sox slapped that "C" on there because Eddie Einhorn secretly wanted an "E" on it.
cutuphalfdead wrote:no crown ftw
Low crowns and no crowns have always looked weird on me. Especially when I wear them backwards.
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 04, 2015 8:49 pm
by Norah
Lament wrote:BigRedLedbetter wrote:I love this White Sox hat.

Random fact: That identity marked one of only four seasons since 1909 where the White Sox didn't wear either a hat or jersey that simply read "SOX" on it (1942, 1987-1989). The urban legend was that the Sox slapped that "C" on there because Eddie Einhorn secretly wanted an "E" on it.
cutuphalfdead wrote:no crown ftw
Low crowns and no crowns have always looked weird on me. Especially when I wear them backwards.
It's because deep down, you're a black man.
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 04, 2015 8:51 pm
by Lament
cutuphalfdead wrote:It's because deep down, you're a black man.
Once you get past my lesbian exterior, yes.
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 04, 2015 8:52 pm
by Lament
This is what I see when I look in the mirror...

Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 04, 2015 8:56 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
Lament wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:It's because deep down, you're a black man.
Once you get past my lesbian exterior, yes.

Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 04, 2015 9:01 pm
by Lament
I like when the A's break out this throwback...

Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 04, 2015 9:11 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
Lament wrote:I like when the A's break out this throwback...

I have/love this hat....

Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 04, 2015 9:21 pm
by Norah
Lament wrote:I like when the A's break out this throwback...

That is fucking sharp right there.
I actually like the A's current home uniforms when worn with the high socks ala sonny gray.
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 04, 2015 9:28 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
cutuphalfdead wrote:Lament wrote:I like when the A's break out this throwback...

That is fucking sharp right there.
I actually like the A's current home uniforms when worn with the high socks ala sonny gray.
The socks are great.
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 04, 2015 9:29 pm
by numbers
Agreed with Lament on the hats. Give me the 5950 or give me death.
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 04, 2015 9:33 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
Love these Giants socks!

Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 04, 2015 9:33 pm
by EJ
Lament wrote:This is what I see when I look in the mirror...

Funny. When I think of you, I see Bake McBride.

Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 04, 2015 9:35 pm
by darth_vedder
Is this thread only for baseball uniforms?
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 04, 2015 9:35 pm
by Norah
EJ wrote:Lament wrote:This is what I see when I look in the mirror...

Funny. When I think of you, I see Bake McBride.

I look in the mirror and see this:

Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 04, 2015 9:41 pm
by Kaius
I like these so much more than our normal home/away uniforms.
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 04, 2015 9:42 pm
by darth_vedder
I wish when the MLB returned to DC, that they kept this name, rather than the Nationals:

Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 04, 2015 9:45 pm
by Norah
darth_vedder wrote:I wish when the MLB returned to DC, that they kept this name, rather than the Nationals:

I know there's precedent for doing it anyway (The original Baltimore Orioles are the franchise that is now the New York Yankees) but the Senators are the Rangers now.
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 04, 2015 9:47 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
cutuphalfdead wrote:darth_vedder wrote:I wish when the MLB returned to DC, that they kept this name, rather than the Nationals:

I know there's precedent for doing it anyway (The original Baltimore Orioles are the franchise that is now the New York Yankees) but the Senators are the Rangers now.
The Twins use to be the Washington Senators as well.
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 04, 2015 9:49 pm
by darth_vedder
cutuphalfdead wrote:darth_vedder wrote:I wish when the MLB returned to DC, that they kept this name, rather than the Nationals:

I know there's precedent for doing it anyway (The original Baltimore Orioles are the franchise that is now the New York Yankees) but the Senators are the Rangers now.
DC lost the Senators twice...the other time was to the Twins.
In the "pro" Nationals camp though, it was an early name for the team in 1900-ish. It was later changed to the Senators, who moved to Texas.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_o ... sota_Twins
One of the American League's eight charter franchises, the club was founded in Kansas City, Kansas in 1894 as the Kansas City Blues before moving to Washington, D.C. and renamed Senators. In 1905 the team changed its official name to the Washington Nationals.[1] The name "Nationals" would appear on the uniforms for only 2 seasons, and would then be replaced with the "W" logo for the next 52 years. The media often shortened the nickname to "Nats". Many fans and newspapers (especially out-of-town papers) persisted in using the "Senators" nickname. Over time, "Nationals" faded as a nickname, and "Senators" became dominant. Baseball guides would list the club's nickname as "Nationals or Senators", acknowledging the dual-nickname situation.
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 04, 2015 9:52 pm
by The Argonaut
Thank you for having us to your dinner party. The wife and I had a truly nice time.