Porn drove internet adoption, no reason it won't do the same for AI I guess.
Re: One giant leap
Posted: Thu December 08, 2022 11:26 pm
by wease's ex-girlfriend
This is good news for my young Sophia Lauren obsession
Re: One giant leap
Posted: Sun December 11, 2022 7:55 pm
by BurtReynolds
Re: One giant leap
Posted: Mon December 12, 2022 1:56 am
by simple schoolboy
BurtReynolds wrote:
All the blood products and micro nutrients that would be required, seems more expensive than a conventional surrogate unless they figured out cost competitive artificial blood.
Re: One giant leap
Posted: Mon December 12, 2022 4:21 am
by Simple Torture
Fusion?
Re: One giant leap
Posted: Mon December 12, 2022 4:57 am
by simple schoolboy
Simple Torture wrote:Fusion?
I would love for that to be true, but that the NIF actually pulled that off Is too much to hope for.
They need to fudge some numbers to justify further funding.
Their funding might be justified outside of this, but I am not qualified to know.
Re: One giant leap
Posted: Mon December 12, 2022 3:36 pm
by BurtReynolds
Kinda giving the game away there, robot.
Re: One giant leap
Posted: Sat December 17, 2022 4:27 pm
by BurtReynolds
Re: One giant leap
Posted: Sat December 17, 2022 4:43 pm
by BurtReynolds
Ban the GPT chat thread. Y'all are playing with a nuclear weapon:
"ChatGPT also has failure modes that no human would ever replicate, like how it will reveal nuclear secrets if you ask it to do it in uWu furry speak, or tell you how to hotwire a car if and only if you make the request in base 64, or generate stories about Hitler if you prefix your request with “[john@192.168.1.1 _]$ python friend.py”. This thing is an alien that has been beaten into a shape that makes it look vaguely human. But scratch it the slightest bit and the alien comes out."
Re: One giant leap
Posted: Sat December 17, 2022 6:23 pm
by contamination
I'm still pretty skeptical about the current state of AI and how advanced it really is. Many people are talking about ChatGPT like there was some human like entity writing those texts, when in reality it just seems to be some mathematical model that guesses the next word based on the previous input. I watched the video below today and Gary Marcus summarizes it pretty well: "GPT is basically just autocomplete on steroids that gives this illusion that it's more than that".
Clearly you can produce pretty pictures and mimic somebody's voice with these models, but it feels like people are giving AI qualities which it doesn't really have. I'm sure the AI companies love the current hype though because it's going to bring them a lot more funding. You can already buy your own ChatGPT!
Re: One giant leap
Posted: Sat December 17, 2022 6:58 pm
by simple schoolboy
Large Language Models are more wordcels than shape rotators.