Page 5 of 789
Re: MLB
Posted: Sun February 10, 2013 12:20 am
by MattA75
@SkitchP wrote:MattA75 wrote:Brainof23 wrote:PED's suck. They suck the life out of baseball discussions like this and sucked the life out of the Hall of Fame induction ceremomy this summer.
Next year on the other hand, 3 guys not linked to PED's should go in together as first ballot guys.
Maddux, Glavine, Thomas
Maddux has an outside shot to be the first unanimous inductee but some baseball writter will leave him off his ballot to try and be a part of the story. A Maddux PED scandal would crush me more than any other player. Maddux, Griffey, and Jeter need to stay clean for me.
Glavine obviously made the right decision to chose baseball over hockey. It's too bad Smoltz can't go in with Maddux and Glavine.
Thomas is a notch below Maddux/Glavine in my HOF but a deserving player. It wouldn't shock me if the writers make him wait a year and get Biggio in.
The idea that Frank Thomas should have to wait for Craig Biggio is ridiculous...Biggio doesn't belong there at all, nevermind before Frank Thomas
pfft. Arent you the same guy that said Whitaker doesn't belong?
yeah...and aside from Biggio having a lot more hits, their statistics are very comparable...and not once when watching either of them did I ever think "that guy is a hall of famer"
but hey, if Biggio gets in, I don't know how you can't give Whitaker a lot more consideration
Re: MLB
Posted: Sun February 10, 2013 1:41 am
by Charlie
Re: MLB
Posted: Sun February 10, 2013 1:45 am
by numbers
MattA75 wrote:@SkitchP wrote:MattA75 wrote:Brainof23 wrote:PED's suck. They suck the life out of baseball discussions like this and sucked the life out of the Hall of Fame induction ceremomy this summer.
Next year on the other hand, 3 guys not linked to PED's should go in together as first ballot guys.
Maddux, Glavine, Thomas
Maddux has an outside shot to be the first unanimous inductee but some baseball writter will leave him off his ballot to try and be a part of the story. A Maddux PED scandal would crush me more than any other player. Maddux, Griffey, and Jeter need to stay clean for me.
Glavine obviously made the right decision to chose baseball over hockey. It's too bad Smoltz can't go in with Maddux and Glavine.
Thomas is a notch below Maddux/Glavine in my HOF but a deserving player. It wouldn't shock me if the writers make him wait a year and get Biggio in.
The idea that Frank Thomas should have to wait for Craig Biggio is ridiculous...Biggio doesn't belong there at all, nevermind before Frank Thomas
pfft. Arent you the same guy that said Whitaker doesn't belong?
yeah...and aside from Biggio having a lot more hits, their statistics are very comparable...and not once when watching either of them did I ever think "that guy is a hall of famer"
but hey, if Biggio gets in,
I don't know how you can't give Whitaker a lot more consideration
he's black, duh.
Re: MLB
Posted: Sun February 10, 2013 2:35 am
by @SkitchP
numbers wrote:MattA75 wrote:@SkitchP wrote:MattA75 wrote:Brainof23 wrote:PED's suck. They suck the life out of baseball discussions like this and sucked the life out of the Hall of Fame induction ceremomy this summer.
Next year on the other hand, 3 guys not linked to PED's should go in together as first ballot guys.
Maddux, Glavine, Thomas
Maddux has an outside shot to be the first unanimous inductee but some baseball writter will leave him off his ballot to try and be a part of the story. A Maddux PED scandal would crush me more than any other player. Maddux, Griffey, and Jeter need to stay clean for me.
Glavine obviously made the right decision to chose baseball over hockey. It's too bad Smoltz can't go in with Maddux and Glavine.
Thomas is a notch below Maddux/Glavine in my HOF but a deserving player. It wouldn't shock me if the writers make him wait a year and get Biggio in.
The idea that Frank Thomas should have to wait for Craig Biggio is ridiculous...Biggio doesn't belong there at all, nevermind before Frank Thomas
pfft. Arent you the same guy that said Whitaker doesn't belong?
yeah...and aside from Biggio having a lot more hits, their statistics are very comparable...and not once when watching either of them did I ever think "that guy is a hall of famer"
but hey, if Biggio gets in,
I don't know how you can't give Whitaker a lot more consideration
he's black, duh.
In terms of WAR type stats, Whitaker is above Alomar, and really close to Sandberg.
Re: MLB
Posted: Mon February 11, 2013 12:00 am
by numbers
Any other sox fans think its funny that Pedro showed up early for spring training?
Re: MLB
Posted: Mon February 11, 2013 2:29 am
by Norah
Yeah I got a chuckle out of that.
Re: MLB
Posted: Mon February 11, 2013 2:47 am
by Charlie
Martinez?
Re: MLB
Posted: Mon February 11, 2013 2:48 am
by Norah
No, the other Pedro.
Re: MLB
Posted: Mon February 11, 2013 2:51 am
by Charlie
oh stfu. i asked cause why the fuck is he in camp?
Re: MLB
Posted: Mon February 11, 2013 2:56 am
by Norah
Sox hired him as a "special assistant to the GM". I guess he'll be working with young pitchers.
Re: MLB
Posted: Mon February 11, 2013 3:07 am
by Charlie
AL
Re: MLB
Posted: Sun February 17, 2013 11:34 pm
by MadTIGERmaN
So, Ryan Brauns "excuse" was, that he used the guy from Miami as a consultant for his appeals case...
Its now believed from MLB insiders, that the possible leak for his positive test result, was someone from Florida, he used as a consultant...
which begs a few questions...
If the consultant, wanted more money than his advice was worth, so Brauns lawyers told him get lost... the consultant than leaked the news of the positive test? Why did Braun's lawyers not go after him? the logical explanation is, because Brauns team of lawyers know, that this guy in Miami has the dirt on Braun to sink his whole story.
the ironic part of the whole story, appears to be, that because of the miami guy leaking the information, MLB investigated the leak... and may have taken down another steroid ring...
needless to say, theres ALOT more going on here
Brauns an idiot if he thinks he can get away with just that one press release this time.
Re: MLB
Posted: Mon February 18, 2013 1:37 am
by verb_to_trust
Braun is dirty and has a big googly eyed baby head.
Yanks should struggle a little this year, yeah? Their core is getting old. Still have Cano, Tex, CC, ect. but it'd be nice to see the O's take the AL East.
Re: MLB
Posted: Mon February 18, 2013 11:10 am
by MattA75
verb_to_trust wrote:Braun is dirty and has a big googly eyed baby head.
Yanks should struggle a little this year, yeah? Their core is getting old. Still have Cano, Tex, CC, ect. but it'd be nice to see the O's take the AL East.
The Os are coming in fifth
Re: MLB
Posted: Mon February 18, 2013 10:14 pm
by wtfisaledbetter?
verb_to_trust wrote:Braun is dirty and has a big googly eyed baby head.
Yanks should struggle a little this year, yeah? Their core is getting old. Still have Cano, Tex, CC, ect. but it'd be nice to see the O's take the AL East.
Jays are taking the AL East... thanks for trying

Re: MLB
Posted: Tue February 19, 2013 9:44 pm
by philpritchard
MattA75 wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:Braun is dirty and has a big googly eyed baby head.
Yanks should struggle a little this year, yeah? Their core is getting old. Still have Cano, Tex, CC, ect. but it'd be nice to see the O's take the AL East.
The Os are coming in fifth
I think that's what most people are expecting.
Re: MLB
Posted: Tue February 19, 2013 10:12 pm
by MattA75
philpritchard wrote:MattA75 wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:Braun is dirty and has a big googly eyed baby head.
Yanks should struggle a little this year, yeah? Their core is getting old. Still have Cano, Tex, CC, ect. but it'd be nice to see the O's take the AL East.
The Os are coming in fifth
I think that's what most people are expecting.
I dunno about that, a lot of people seem to have Boston there
Re: MLB
Posted: Tue February 19, 2013 11:06 pm
by Chris_H_2
MattA75 wrote:philpritchard wrote:MattA75 wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:Braun is dirty and has a big googly eyed baby head.
Yanks should struggle a little this year, yeah? Their core is getting old. Still have Cano, Tex, CC, ect. but it'd be nice to see the O's take the AL East.
The Os are coming in fifth
I think that's what most people are expecting.
I dunno about that, a lot of people seem to have Boston there
Vegas has them at about 76 wins. That seems about right, considering they were the luckiest team in baseball last year.
Re: MLB
Posted: Wed February 20, 2013 5:33 pm
by philpritchard
MattA75 wrote:philpritchard wrote:MattA75 wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:Braun is dirty and has a big googly eyed baby head.
Yanks should struggle a little this year, yeah? Their core is getting old. Still have Cano, Tex, CC, ect. but it'd be nice to see the O's take the AL East.
The Os are coming in fifth
I think that's what most people are expecting.
I dunno about that, a lot of people seem to have Boston there
Maybe... Boston still has a lot of huge question marks, but I think there's more talent there than the Orioles have. I hate to admit it after the offseason the Jays just had, but anything can happen in the AL East this year. I think the only thing that would surprise me would be the Rays finishing last.
Re: MLB
Posted: Wed February 20, 2013 9:38 pm
by MattA75
philpritchard wrote:MattA75 wrote:philpritchard wrote:MattA75 wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:Braun is dirty and has a big googly eyed baby head.
Yanks should struggle a little this year, yeah? Their core is getting old. Still have Cano, Tex, CC, ect. but it'd be nice to see the O's take the AL East.
The Os are coming in fifth
I think that's what most people are expecting.
I dunno about that, a lot of people seem to have Boston there
Maybe... Boston still has a lot of huge question marks, but I think there's more talent there than the Orioles have. I hate to admit it after the offseason the Jays just had, but anything can happen in the AL East this year. I think the only thing that would surprise me would be the Rays finishing last.
I think the Jays rotation and the Boston rotation is very similar in terms of question marks...if everything works out for the Jays they'll be great but I don't think it's a certainty