Red Mosquito

Strat wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:People really shouldn't be afraid to let this guy speak. He is a clown with nothing interesting to say.

I agree.

I think it was fine. Maher didnt need to start a war with him. He exposed him as being an attention whore and jokester.

Though i heard overtime is much more intense so im about to watch that.

Larry Wilmore

Milo is a professional provocateur; he relishes his role as a troll and getting a reaction. I can't take him seriously when he's being douchy but I can take him in discussions when he's not playing that role (which is usually not the case).
On a separate point anyone seen any of Leah Remini's Scientology shows on A&E? I've seen a few and it's amazing what people will believe and do with that organization. If you saw the Going Clear doc it's not anything new but still eye opening nonetheless.

The Hitchens comparison is so off the mark it's ridiculous

Any real-life human being who refers to himself as a "troll" probably isn't worth engaging or thinking about for more than two seconds.

LoathedVermin72 wrote:Any real-life human being who refers to himself as a "troll" probably isn't worth engaging or thinking about for more than two seconds.

Yep, it's like people that refer to themselves as "sarcastic" in assorted social media profiles.

LoathedVermin72 wrote:Any real-life human being who refers to himself as a "troll" probably isn't worth engaging or thinking about for more than two seconds.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/22/arts ... .html?_r=0

He should take credit. Free speech is awesome.

BurtReynolds wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/22/arts/television/bill-maher-milo-yiannopoulos-interview.html?_r=0

He should take credit. Free speech is awesome.

...?!

He didn't actually have anything to do with it though

Also from what I saw today Maher seems to have similar views to Milo on the whole age-of-consent thing

yeah he really didn't. I liked the interview though.

One of the better segments in a while