Page 5 of 6
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
Posted: Thu November 20, 2014 7:38 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
LoathedVermin72 wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:EJ wrote:Gladiator
The Two Towers (if only allowed to pick one of the trilogy)
Yeah LV needs to fix that on his list.
I can't separate them. They are one equal entity in my mind. I can't watch one without the others.
Then you don't have a true top ten, therefore your list is invalid. Do the right thing, LV
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
Posted: Thu November 20, 2014 7:41 pm
by LoathedVermin72
E.H. Ruddock wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:EJ wrote:Gladiator
The Two Towers (if only allowed to pick one of the trilogy)
Yeah LV needs to fix that on his list.
I can't separate them. They are one equal entity in my mind. I can't watch one without the others.
Then you don't have a true top ten, therefore your list is invalid. Do the right thing, LV
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
Posted: Thu November 20, 2014 7:45 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
I just made things right
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
Posted: Thu November 20, 2014 7:46 pm
by bada
I don't know. The LOTR Trilogy is three seperate movies. Kill Bill 1 & 2 is one movie split apart by a nervous studio.
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
Posted: Thu November 20, 2014 7:48 pm
by LoathedVermin72
You guys can say whatever you want, but it will not change my mind.
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
Posted: Thu November 20, 2014 7:49 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
LoathedVermin72 wrote:You guys can say whatever you want, but it will not change my mind.
Like I said, it is ok. I fixed things.
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
Posted: Thu November 20, 2014 7:50 pm
by LoathedVermin72
E.H. Ruddock wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:You guys can say whatever you want, but it will not change my mind.
Like I said, it is ok. I fixed things.
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
Posted: Thu November 20, 2014 7:50 pm
by LoathedVermin72
Re: Top 10 of the Decade: The 2000s
Posted: Thu November 20, 2014 8:38 pm
by epilogue
durdencommatyler wrote:1. Mulholland Drive
2. Dancer in the Dark
3. Memento
4. Talk to Her
5. The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
6. Children of Men
6. Donnie Darko
7. No Country for Old Men
8. The Fountain
10. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
11. High Fidelity
12. Storytelling
Honorable Mentions:
(13) American Psycho
(14) Before Sunset
(15) 25th Hour
(16) Adaptation
(17) Zodiac
Thanks, Ruddo! I get to put High Fidelity into the list proper thanks to your wizardry.
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
Posted: Thu November 20, 2014 8:52 pm
by LoathedVermin72
I will not change remod's remodding
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
Posted: Thu November 20, 2014 9:25 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
LoathedVermin72 wrote:I will not change remod's remodding
You brought this on yourself
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
Posted: Thu November 20, 2014 10:26 pm
by LoathedVermin72
E.H. Ruddock wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:I will not change remod's remodding
You brought this on yourself
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
Posted: Thu November 20, 2014 10:30 pm
by LetMeSleep
Of course you can. the third was just lots of fucking walking and weeping. Boring as shit.
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
Posted: Thu November 20, 2014 11:14 pm
by ABNorman
LetMeSleep wrote:Of course you can. the third was just lots of fucking walking and weeping. Boring as shit.
MY FRIENDS. YOU BOW FOR NO MAN.
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
Posted: Thu November 20, 2014 11:21 pm
by epilogue
They are separate movies. Made at different times. As separate movies. One is Great. One is pretty damn good. One is junk. Then they went and made three MORE movies. They are separate and it's not only easy, but necessary to differentiate between them. Separate them. And like them all differently, for fuck's sake.
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
Posted: Thu November 20, 2014 11:22 pm
by LoathedVermin72
durdencommatyler wrote:They are separate movies. Made at different times. As separate movies. One is Great. One is pretty damn good. One is junk. Then they went and made three MORE movies. They are separate and it's not only easy, but necessary to differentiate between them. Separate them. And like them all differently, for fuck's sake.
Actually, they were kind of all made at once. And I love them all equally.
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
Posted: Thu November 20, 2014 11:25 pm
by epilogue
LoathedVermin72 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:They are separate movies. Made at different times. As separate movies. One is Great. One is pretty damn good. One is junk. Then they went and made three MORE movies. They are separate and it's not only easy, but necessary to differentiate between them. Separate them. And like them all differently, for fuck's sake.
Actually, they were kind of all made at once. And I love them all equally.
Actually "kinda" means not really. And you shouldn't because they aren't equal.
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
Posted: Thu November 20, 2014 11:27 pm
by LoathedVermin72
durdencommatyler wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:They are separate movies. Made at different times. As separate movies. One is Great. One is pretty damn good. One is junk. Then they went and made three MORE movies. They are separate and it's not only easy, but necessary to differentiate between them. Separate them. And like them all differently, for fuck's sake.
Actually, they were kind of all made at once. And I love them all equally.
Actually "kinda" means not really. And you shouldn't because they aren't equal.
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
Posted: Thu November 20, 2014 11:28 pm
by epilogue
LoathedVermin72 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:They are separate movies. Made at different times. As separate movies. One is Great. One is pretty damn good. One is junk. Then they went and made three MORE movies. They are separate and it's not only easy, but necessary to differentiate between them. Separate them. And like them all differently, for fuck's sake.
Actually, they were kind of all made at once. And I love them all equally.
Actually "kinda" means not really. And you shouldn't because they aren't equal.
Re: Top 12 of the Decade: The 2000s
Posted: Thu November 20, 2014 11:29 pm
by LoathedVermin72
durdencommatyler wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:They are separate movies. Made at different times. As separate movies. One is Great. One is pretty damn good. One is junk. Then they went and made three MORE movies. They are separate and it's not only easy, but necessary to differentiate between them. Separate them. And like them all differently, for fuck's sake.
Actually, they were kind of all made at once. And I love them all equally.
Actually "kinda" means not really. And you shouldn't because they aren't equal.
