Page 5 of 12

Re: Jurassic World

Posted: Sun June 14, 2015 2:07 am
by McParadigm
Rangi Guy wrote:it's just a dumb Hollywood movie
If the built in audience for sci-fi movies is sci-fi fans, and the built in audience for horror movies is horror fans, then the built in audience for dumb Hollywood must be...

Re: Jurassic World

Posted: Sun June 14, 2015 2:33 am
by spike
McParadigm wrote:
Rangi Guy wrote:it's just a dumb Hollywood movie
If the built in audience for sci-fi movies is sci-fi fans, and the built in audience for horror movies is horror fans, then the built in audience for dumb Hollywood must be...
we get it, you're better than everyone else.

Re: Jurassic World

Posted: Sun June 14, 2015 2:35 am
by 96583UP
Kaius wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Kaius wrote:It's looks bad, but I lost hope for this franchise after the third one.
I had hope after the third one because I thought they weren't making any more.
Image
the dude on the ladder is the best one

Re: Jurassic World

Posted: Sun June 14, 2015 2:37 am
by spike
96583UP wrote:
Kaius wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Kaius wrote:It's looks bad, but I lost hope for this franchise after the third one.
I had hope after the third one because I thought they weren't making any more.
Image
the dude on the ladder is the best one
cameraman ftw

Re: Jurassic World

Posted: Sun June 14, 2015 2:38 am
by BurtReynolds
If I made a dumb blockbuster i'd dispense with story altogether. No love interest, no comic relief, no subtext, none of that shit. It would just be wall to wall dinosaurs eating zombies, plus whatever nudity and cursing I could cram in a PG13 movie. Everything else is not only unnecessary, but actively detracts from the movie's dumbness.

Re: Jurassic World

Posted: Sun June 14, 2015 2:39 am
by E.H. Ruddock
The guy behind the ladder

Re: Jurassic World

Posted: Sun June 14, 2015 2:40 am
by spike
BurtReynolds wrote:If I made a dumb blockbuster i'd dispense with story altogether. No love interest, no comic relief, no subtext, none of that shit. It would just be wall to wall dinosaurs eating zombies, plus whatever nudity and cursing I could cram in a PG13 movie. Everything else is not only unnecessary, but actively detracts from the movie's dumbness.
this is known as the B movie genre. you're late to the party.

Re: Jurassic World

Posted: Sun June 14, 2015 2:41 am
by Norah
Guy with the boom mic.

Re: Jurassic World

Posted: Sun June 14, 2015 2:41 am
by 96583UP
yeah the dude behind the ladder is pretty great

Re: Jurassic World

Posted: Sun June 14, 2015 2:41 am
by Norah
Guy with the clipboard.

Re: Jurassic World

Posted: Sun June 14, 2015 2:42 am
by Norah
Guy at the monitor.

Re: Jurassic World

Posted: Sun June 14, 2015 2:42 am
by Norah
We're just listing them, right?

Re: Jurassic World

Posted: Sun June 14, 2015 2:43 am
by 96583UP
guy in the orange hat is growing on me

Re: Jurassic World

Posted: Sun June 14, 2015 2:43 am
by Strat
hang on to your butts

Re: Jurassic World

Posted: Sun June 14, 2015 2:45 am
by spike
is the first guy turk from scrubs or not?

Re: Jurassic World

Posted: Sun June 14, 2015 2:45 am
by BurtReynolds
spike wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:If I made a dumb blockbuster i'd dispense with story altogether. No love interest, no comic relief, no subtext, none of that shit. It would just be wall to wall dinosaurs eating zombies, plus whatever nudity and cursing I could cram in a PG13 movie. Everything else is not only unnecessary, but actively detracts from the movie's dumbness.
this is known as the B movie genre. you're late to the party.
B movies look like shit and are usually crammed with filler because of budget. If you have 200 million to blow, make an 80 minute special effects extravaganza and stfu about heroes and villains and plot and stupid shit like that.

Re: Jurassic World

Posted: Sun June 14, 2015 2:47 am
by E.H. Ruddock
What is that gif even from?

Re: Jurassic World

Posted: Sun June 14, 2015 2:48 am
by lennytheweedwhacker
spike wrote:
96583UP wrote:
Kaius wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Kaius wrote:It's looks bad, but I lost hope for this franchise after the third one.
I had hope after the third one because I thought they weren't making any more.
Image
the dude on the ladder is the best one
cameraman ftw
agreed

Re: Jurassic World

Posted: Sun June 14, 2015 2:51 am
by spike
BurtReynolds wrote:
spike wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:If I made a dumb blockbuster i'd dispense with story altogether. No love interest, no comic relief, no subtext, none of that shit. It would just be wall to wall dinosaurs eating zombies, plus whatever nudity and cursing I could cram in a PG13 movie. Everything else is not only unnecessary, but actively detracts from the movie's dumbness.
this is known as the B movie genre. you're late to the party.
B movies look like shit and are usually crammed with filler because of budget. If you have 200 million to blow, make an 80 minute special effects extravaganza and stfu about heroes and villains and plot and stupid shit like that.
transformers then

Re: Jurassic World

Posted: Sun June 14, 2015 2:52 am
by E.H. Ruddock
spike wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:If I made a dumb blockbuster i'd dispense with story altogether. No love interest, no comic relief, no subtext, none of that shit. It would just be wall to wall dinosaurs eating zombies, plus whatever nudity and cursing I could cram in a PG13 movie. Everything else is not only unnecessary, but actively detracts from the movie's dumbness.
this is known as the B movie genre. you're late to the party.
At first I thought you were referring to a genre of movies that B likes