Re: Bowie - Blackstar (2016) & RIP David Bowie :(
Posted: Mon January 11, 2016 4:22 pm
Station to Station is so gooood!
lol. had the same thought.McParadigm wrote:What song will Pearl Jam add to their set lists to try and attach themselves in some minor way to his legacy?
Will David Grohl get a new tattoo?
I bet they're really pissed that Nirvana already covered The Man Who Sold the World.Strat wrote:lol. had the same thought.McParadigm wrote:What song will Pearl Jam add to their set lists to try and attach themselves in some minor way to his legacy?
Will David Grohl get a new tattoo?
They covered "Fame" 9 times in 1996.durdencommatyler wrote:I bet they're really pissed that Nirvana already covered The Man Who Sold the World.Strat wrote:lol. had the same thought.McParadigm wrote:What song will Pearl Jam add to their set lists to try and attach themselves in some minor way to his legacy?
Will David Grohl get a new tattoo?
Definitely purposely and i think this is why he released what turned out to be his final album when he had literally days to live, with no indication whatsoever that he was terminally ill. People even hoped he'd tour again.bada wrote:It's odd. I'm a really big fan of his music from the 70s and 80s but I've never had a connection to him as a person. It's like I know the music but not the man. There always felt like a huge distance between artist and audience. Purposely I think. I feel bad for not being as affected as I should considering how much I've enjoyed his music.
Cat peopleMcParadigm wrote:What song will Pearl Jam add to their set lists to try and attach themselves in some minor way to his legacy?
Will David Grohl get a new tattoo?
I think the schism between the music and the man was intentional as well. It helped facilitate his moving from genre to genre. The focus was always on having the listener love the music and not the man.Mine wrote:Definitely purposely and i think this is why he released what turned out to be his final album when he had literally days to live, with no indication whatsoever that he was terminally ill. People even hoped he'd tour again.bada wrote:It's odd. I'm a really big fan of his music from the 70s and 80s but I've never had a connection to him as a person. It's like I know the music but not the man. There always felt like a huge distance between artist and audience. Purposely I think. I feel bad for not being as affected as I should considering how much I've enjoyed his music.
I think the fact that he was able to sustain his career at a point when his new recordings are still highly anticipated and very well received up to his death (rather than being just a living legend aka nostalgia act) is mind blowing and i can't really picture anybody else but Bowie pulling something like this off.
There you go. They'll break that out again, prolly. That makes sense.Varis wrote:They covered "Fame" 9 times in 1996.durdencommatyler wrote:I bet they're really pissed that Nirvana already covered The Man Who Sold the World.Strat wrote:lol. had the same thought.McParadigm wrote:What song will Pearl Jam add to their set lists to try and attach themselves in some minor way to his legacy?
Will David Grohl get a new tattoo?
Blood and Daughter tags are insufficient for modern Pearl Jam coverblasting.Varis wrote:They covered "Fame" 9 times in 1996.durdencommatyler wrote:I bet they're really pissed that Nirvana already covered The Man Who Sold the World.Strat wrote:lol. had the same thought.McParadigm wrote:What song will Pearl Jam add to their set lists to try and attach themselves in some minor way to his legacy?
Will David Grohl get a new tattoo?
Especially if it means we'd have to hear Eddie die some gruesome vocal death every night trying to sing Blood.McParadigm wrote:Blood and Daughter tags are insufficient for modern Pearl Jam coverblasting.Varis wrote:They covered "Fame" 9 times in 1996.durdencommatyler wrote:I bet they're really pissed that Nirvana already covered The Man Who Sold the World.Strat wrote:lol. had the same thought.McParadigm wrote:What song will Pearl Jam add to their set lists to try and attach themselves in some minor way to his legacy?
Will David Grohl get a new tattoo?
surfndestroy wrote:Especially if it means we'd have to hear Eddie die some gruesome vocal death every night trying to sing Blood.McParadigm wrote:Blood and Daughter tags are insufficient for modern Pearl Jam coverblasting.Varis wrote:They covered "Fame" 9 times in 1996.durdencommatyler wrote:I bet they're really pissed that Nirvana already covered The Man Who Sold the World.Strat wrote:lol. had the same thought.McParadigm wrote:What song will Pearl Jam add to their set lists to try and attach themselves in some minor way to his legacy?
Will David Grohl get a new tattoo?
Huh. Funniest post of the day is in the Bowie death thread.durdencommatyler wrote:surfndestroy wrote:Especially if it means we'd have to hear Eddie die some gruesome vocal death every night trying to sing Blood.McParadigm wrote:Blood and Daughter tags are insufficient for modern Pearl Jam coverblasting.Varis wrote:They covered "Fame" 9 times in 1996.durdencommatyler wrote:I bet they're really pissed that Nirvana already covered The Man Who Sold the World.Strat wrote:lol. had the same thought.McParadigm wrote:What song will Pearl Jam add to their set lists to try and attach themselves in some minor way to his legacy?
Will David Grohl get a new tattoo?
Death is a Blackstar.McParadigm wrote:Huh. Funniest post of the day is in the Bowie death thread.durdencommatyler wrote:surfndestroy wrote:Especially if it means we'd have to hear Eddie die some gruesome vocal death every night trying to sing Blood.McParadigm wrote:Blood and Daughter tags are insufficient for modern Pearl Jam coverblasting.Varis wrote:They covered "Fame" 9 times in 1996.durdencommatyler wrote:I bet they're really pissed that Nirvana already covered The Man Who Sold the World.Strat wrote:lol. had the same thought.McParadigm wrote:What song will Pearl Jam add to their set lists to try and attach themselves in some minor way to his legacy?
Will David Grohl get a new tattoo?
Not quite a big enough hit tho.Kevin Davis wrote:They could do a credible version of "Diamond Dogs," I think. Pretty straightforward rock tune, well in Eddie's register.
The question would be, why? I don't recall Bowie being mentioned as an influence. It would just be riding coattails (or following the hearse in this instance). Unfortunately, Pearl Jam has shown they are not above this.Kevin Davis wrote:They could do a credible version of "Diamond Dogs," I think. Pretty straightforward rock tune, well in Eddie's register.