Page 5 of 6

Re: the Katy Perry thread must live on

Posted: Fri February 26, 2016 7:14 pm
by bada
That pic is too much.

Re: the Katy Perry thread must live on

Posted: Fri February 26, 2016 9:39 pm
by epilogue
This place is the worst.

Re: the Katy Perry thread must live on

Posted: Fri February 26, 2016 9:43 pm
by BurtReynolds
PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Internet Conspiracy Theorists Think Katy Perry Is Actually JonBenét Ramsey

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/kat ... 1f60ea67ac
Don't care.

Have you seen this? :shock:

Stickman wrote:Image
bumps

Re: the Katy Perry thread must live on

Posted: Fri February 26, 2016 9:45 pm
by BurtReynolds

Re: the Katy Perry thread must live on

Posted: Fri February 26, 2016 10:52 pm
by Mojopin
Image

Re: the Katy Perry thread must live on

Posted: Fri February 26, 2016 10:57 pm
by tommymtcom
I don't see it at all. The only reason they look remotely similar is the bad photoshopping.

Re: the Katy Perry thread must live on

Posted: Fri February 26, 2016 11:02 pm
by Kaius
I'm not even a "boobs guy" but those are immaculate.

Re: the Katy Perry thread must live on

Posted: Fri February 26, 2016 11:07 pm
by epilogue
Kaius wrote:I'm not even a "boobs guy" but those are immaculate.
I don't.... I don't understand... What does this... I mean... I don't... what? I don't...

Re: the Katy Perry thread must live on

Posted: Fri February 26, 2016 11:19 pm
by PHATJ
durdencommatyler wrote:
Kaius wrote:I'm not even a "boobs guy" but those are immaculate.
I don't.... I don't understand... What does this... I mean... I don't... what? I don't...
Yeah man. Boobs rule.

Re: the Katy Perry thread must live on

Posted: Fri February 26, 2016 11:25 pm
by Kaius
durdencommatyler wrote:
Kaius wrote:I'm not even a "boobs guy" but those are immaculate.
I don't.... I don't understand... What does this... I mean... I don't... what? I don't...
Well... Some people that are attracted to females tend to really be drawn toward boobs, while others may be big on butts, or legs, or hair, or eyes, or lips. Now, I'm strictly talking physical attraction, not full-experience human attraction. So, to get to my comment, I usually don't mind if they are big, or little, or round or pointy or whatever. In fact, I kind of think anything more than a handful is a too much.

But I like hers. Those are nice.

Re: the Katy Perry thread must live on

Posted: Fri February 26, 2016 11:28 pm
by BurtReynolds
THey kinda look like butts when you squeeze them together.

Re: the Katy Perry thread must live on

Posted: Fri February 26, 2016 11:41 pm
by epilogue
Kaius wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Kaius wrote:I'm not even a "boobs guy" but those are immaculate.
I don't.... I don't understand... What does this... I mean... I don't... what? I don't...
Well... Some people that are attracted to females tend to really be drawn toward boobs, while others may be big on butts, or legs, or hair, or eyes, or lips. Now, I'm strictly talking physical attraction, not full-experience human attraction. So, to get to my comment, I usually don't mind if they are big, or little, or round or pointy or whatever. In fact, I kind of think anything more than a handful is a too much.

But I like hers. Those are nice.
ALL THESE THINGS ARE AMAZING

Re: the Katy Perry thread must live on

Posted: Fri February 26, 2016 11:42 pm
by epilogue
Man, women are just fantastic. God bless women.

Re: the Katy Perry thread must live on

Posted: Fri February 26, 2016 11:48 pm
by BurtReynolds
men>women and God doesn't exist

Re: the Katy Perry thread must live on

Posted: Fri February 26, 2016 11:49 pm
by tommymtcom
He's got you there, Joey.

Re: the Katy Perry thread must live on

Posted: Fri February 26, 2016 11:57 pm
by epilogue
Men are certainly not better than women. And the god thing is just an expression. Obviously it doesn't exist.

Re: the Katy Perry thread must live on

Posted: Fri February 26, 2016 11:58 pm
by tommymtcom
durdencommatyler wrote:Men are certainly not better than women. And the god thing is just an expression. Obviously it doesn't exist.
I wouldn't even be able to read this post if not for Alexander graham bell, who was a man, inventing the telephone.

Re: the Katy Perry thread must live on

Posted: Sat February 27, 2016 12:00 am
by epilogue
Oh, I get it. Misogyny and patriarchy as internet shtick. Congrats tommy. You've really outdone yourself. We're so lucky to have you. I'm so glad you're here to make these kinds of "jokes."

Re: the Katy Perry thread must live on

Posted: Sat February 27, 2016 12:01 am
by tommymtcom
The joke was that Alexander graham bell has nothing to do with how modern phones work. Try to keep up.

Re: the Katy Perry thread must live on

Posted: Sat February 27, 2016 12:03 am
by epilogue
No, it was funny. Keep it up.