Page 5 of 39

Re: Nine Inch Nails

Posted: Thu April 28, 2016 3:44 pm
by bune
Yes, but it's the breakdown specifically that interests me. That and the Daft Punk Tron soundtrack.

Re: Nine Inch Nails

Posted: Fri April 29, 2016 9:35 am
by LetMeSleep
Ruiner, guys. That song is amazing.

Re: Nine Inch Nails

Posted: Fri April 29, 2016 2:04 pm
by tragabigzanda

Re: Nine Inch Nails

Posted: Fri April 29, 2016 2:13 pm
by LoathedVermin72
Yep. Love Ruiner.

Re: Nine Inch Nails

Posted: Sat April 30, 2016 4:40 pm
by psychobain
All The Love In The World is a good song.

Re: Nine Inch Nails

Posted: Sat April 30, 2016 4:55 pm
by Kevin Davis
psychobain wrote:All The Love In The World is a good song.
Yeah, that's one of the few "With Teeth" tracks I really like.

Re: Nine Inch Nails

Posted: Sun May 01, 2016 2:37 pm
by VinylGuy
Ill rank NIN discography after The Fragile, only studio albums:

1-The Slip
2-With Teeth
3-Hesitation Marks
4- Ghosts
5- Year Zero

Re: Nine Inch Nails

Posted: Wed June 15, 2016 11:39 pm
by psychobain
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/ ... pple-music
Nine Inch Nails’ Trent Reznor is the latest artist to join the music industry’s war of words with YouTube, attacking Google’s video service over the role it plays for musicians.

“I find YouTube’s business to be very disingenuous. It is built on the backs of free, stolen content and that’s how they got that big,” said Reznor in an interview with Billboard.

Reznor was not speaking purely as an artist, however. He is also chief creative officer at Apple Music, the streaming service launched by Apple in 2015, which is one of the key rivals to YouTube in the digital music world.

“I think any free-tiered service is not fair. It’s making their numbers and getting them a big IPO and it is built on the back of my work and that of my peers. That’s how I feel about it. Strongly,” said Reznor, widening his criticism to other rivals like Spotify in the process.

Analysis Why is the music industry battling YouTube and what happens next?
Labels are facing off with Google’s video service over revenues and rights, yet it’s also their biggest partner for streaming music
Read more
YouTube has faced a barrage of criticism from musicians and music-industry bodies in 2016, as part of a campaign in the US and Europe to rework copyright legislation that grants the service “safe harbour” status when users upload copyrighted material without the permission of the rights owners.

Rightsholders have also argued that YouTube’s vast catalogue of free music could impede the growth of paid music-streaming subscription services like Apple Music and Spotify’s premium tier – important context to Reznor’s comments, given his role.

In its most recent public statement, following an open letter to Alphabet boss Larry Page from rock band Sixx:AM, YouTube indicated that the criticism is having an impact on the company’s plans.

“The voices of the artists are being heard, and we’re working through details with the labels and independent music organisations who directly manage the deals with us,” a spokesperson said.

“Having said that, YouTube has paid out over $3bn (£2.1bn) to the music industry, despite being a platform that caters to largely light music listeners who spend an average of one hour per month consuming music – far less than an average Spotify or Apple Music user. Any comparisons of revenue from these platforms are apples and oranges.”

Following Reznor’s criticism, YouTube issued a new statement addressing his comments.

“The overwhelming majority of labels and publishers have licensing agreements in place with YouTube to leave fan videos up on the platform and earn revenue from them. Today the revenue from fan uploaded content accounts for roughly 50 percent of the music industry’s YouTube revenue,” said a spokesperson.

“Any assertion that this content is largely unlicensed is false. To date, we have paid out over $3 billion to the music industry – and that number is growing year on year.”

Re: Nine Inch Nails

Posted: Wed June 15, 2016 11:40 pm
by psychobain
what the hell happened to TZ?

Re: Nine Inch Nails

Posted: Thu June 16, 2016 12:03 am
by tragabigzanda
tragabigzanda wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:Top 10 maybe?
Hello Morning
Close Captioned
The Kill
Place/Position
Do You Like Me?
Latest Disgrace
Recap Modotti
Nightshop
Break
Life & Limb
I'd maybe bump Life & Limb for Epic Problem

Re: Nine Inch Nails

Posted: Wed August 03, 2016 7:29 pm
by bune
Huh. Saw this on another forum.

Image

Re: Nine Inch Nails

Posted: Wed August 03, 2016 9:52 pm
by LoathedVermin72
I like the title.

Re: Nine Inch Nails

Posted: Wed August 03, 2016 10:22 pm
by bune
Now I don't know who to believe: Trent or some random reddit guy.

Image

Re: Nine Inch Nails

Posted: Thu October 06, 2016 7:11 pm
by bune

Re: Nine Inch Nails

Posted: Thu October 06, 2016 7:51 pm
by VinylGuy
At this point i dont understand why he just relax and release music under his name.

Re: Nine Inch Nails

Posted: Sat October 08, 2016 3:20 pm
by VinylGuy
I liked the song. Its not different from anything Trent and Atticus did with NIN...i mean, it even has a nana chorus at the end. Im still confused why this is not a NIN release.

Anyway, its a really cool song.

Re: Nine Inch Nails

Posted: Fri December 16, 2016 9:17 pm
by tragabigzanda

Re: Nine Inch Nails

Posted: Fri December 16, 2016 10:16 pm
by bune
Oh Yeah, and Atticus Ross Is an ‘Official’ Member Now


:shake:

Re: Nine Inch Nails

Posted: Fri December 16, 2016 10:18 pm
by bune
Also I was walking home the other day listening to Hesitation Marks. Who actually wanted a pop Nine Inch Nails album? Don't get me wrong, I mostly like the first half of the album but the second half could be completely cut off and you'd have an alright EP.
Plus, there'll be a special-edition LP-only version of The Fragile called The Fragile: Deviations 1, which will have four discs including instrumentals, alternate versions, and unreleased songs.
God dammit.

Re: Nine Inch Nails

Posted: Fri December 16, 2016 10:20 pm
by tragabigzanda