Red Mosquito

dimejinky99 wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

B wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:I don't have speakers at my current job, and I'm at work all day. Can anyone briefly summarize the theory in that video for me?

Baby Yoda was born the same year as Anakin, and is, thus, the light rising to meet Vader's dark.

It's an interesting idea. George has already addressed that Luke an Leia are the light to counter Vader's dark. But that doesn't mean The Force didn't prep a contingency plan.

I have a twist on that. The twins to counterbalance the emperor and Vader.

Baby yoda to counterbalance Snoke


Eh?? Eh???

They were both out there at the same time

E.H. Ruddock wrote:I love this show so far. Really right up my alley

tragabigzanda wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

B wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:I don't have speakers at my current job, and I'm at work all day. Can anyone briefly summarize the theory in that video for me?

Baby Yoda was born the same year as Anakin, and is, thus, the light rising to meet Vader's dark.

It's an interesting idea. George has already addressed that Luke an Leia are the light to counter Vader's dark. But that doesn't mean The Force didn't prep a contingency plan.

I have a twist on that. The twins to counterbalance the emperor and Vader.

Baby yoda to counterbalance Snoke


Eh?? Eh???

They were both out there at the same time

This is exactly what I DON'T want out of this. The moment they start tying it in heavily with the OT, then there are all these expectations and presumptions that come into my viewing of the thing.

I get that it's set after the OT and before the new ones, and that obviously the Empire and the Jedis will have some impact because they're integral to the world. But I'll be way happier if Mando's story exists wholly apart from Luke and Vader.

B wrote:Whatever it is, it CANNOT be a coincidence that Anakin and Baby Yoda were both born in 41 BBY.

durdencommatyler wrote:

B wrote:Whatever it is, it CANNOT be a coincidence that Anakin and Baby Yoda were both born in 41 BBY.

Why?

Because I haven't watched it yet, I don't know, but are we sure the baby is Force sensitive? Did they establish that yet?

durdencommatyler wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

B wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:I don't have speakers at my current job, and I'm at work all day. Can anyone briefly summarize the theory in that video for me?

Baby Yoda was born the same year as Anakin, and is, thus, the light rising to meet Vader's dark.

It's an interesting idea. George has already addressed that Luke an Leia are the light to counter Vader's dark. But that doesn't mean The Force didn't prep a contingency plan.

I have a twist on that. The twins to counterbalance the emperor and Vader.

Baby yoda to counterbalance Snoke


Eh?? Eh???

They were both out there at the same time

This is exactly what I DON'T want out of this. The moment they start tying it in heavily with the OT, then there are all these expectations and presumptions that come into my viewing of the thing.

I get that it's set after the OT and before the new ones, and that obviously the Empire and the Jedis will have some impact because they're integral to the world. But I'll be way happier if Mando's story exists wholly apart from Luke and Vader.

This show is literally born from an imagination populated by action figures. I have zero expectations for this show outside of that. Pure, playground, kids in the dirt, action figures pewing and slamming into each other fun.

E.H. Ruddock wrote:*pewing

E.H. Ruddock wrote:*pewing

dimejinky99 wrote:*helmet on

Spoiler: show