Re: Brexit
Posted: Mon April 01, 2019 10:08 pm
Green Habit wrote:Were any of the votes today on May's deal or is that referred to by another name?
No these were indicative votes on amendments. Non binding afaik
Green Habit wrote:Were any of the votes today on May's deal or is that referred to by another name?
So if a general election is called, how long can they stave off a hard Brexit in order to run that election?Anders wrote:No, none of the votes were on her deal. It has been defeated three times. Paliament has also ruled out no deal.
There is talk of her putting it up a fourth time, with a confidence vote. Government resigning if it loses again.
My guess would be 12 months then depends on the EU agreeing an extension. Pretty much only an election or 2nd PV would suffice.Green Habit wrote:So if a general election is called, how long can they stave off a hard Brexit in order to run that election?Anders wrote:No, none of the votes were on her deal. It has been defeated three times. Paliament has also ruled out no deal.
There is talk of her putting it up a fourth time, with a confidence vote. Government resigning if it loses again.
A deal would be made with the EU. Possibly for a two year extension.Green Habit wrote:So if a general election is called, how long can they stave off a hard Brexit in order to run that election?Anders wrote:No, none of the votes were on her deal. It has been defeated three times. Paliament has also ruled out no deal.
There is talk of her putting it up a fourth time, with a confidence vote. Government resigning if it loses again.
Green Habit wrote:So if a general election is called, how long can they stave off a hard Brexit in order to run that election?Anders wrote:No, none of the votes were on her deal. It has been defeated three times. Paliament has also ruled out no deal.
There is talk of her putting it up a fourth time, with a confidence vote. Government resigning if it loses again.
Green Habit wrote:Thanks for all the answers as I try to learn more about this!
Unless something significant comes out of Wednesday, I’m still skeptical.dimejinky99 wrote:EU will grant an extension for a reported two years.
Thank you!dimejinky99 wrote:GH brexit republic and Tony Connolly (on Twitter) are among the best out there.
Brexit cast is more about the parliamentary process than the impact. It's a surface pod.Green Habit wrote:Thank you!dimejinky99 wrote:GH brexit republic and Tony Connolly (on Twitter) are among the best out there.
LetMeSleep wrote:Brexit cast is more about the parliamentary process than the impact. It's a surface pod.Green Habit wrote:Thank you!dimejinky99 wrote:GH brexit republic and Tony Connolly (on Twitter) are among the best out there.
Green Habit wrote:Thank you!dimejinky99 wrote:GH brexit republic and Tony Connolly (on Twitter) are among the best out there.
Yeah that's the one. As someone on the other side of the world this pod reports on SW1 quite well. It certainly doesn't delve into issues. Its a reporting pod.dimejinky99 wrote:LetMeSleep wrote:Brexit cast is more about the parliamentary process than the impact. It's a surface pod.Green Habit wrote:Thank you!dimejinky99 wrote:GH brexit republic and Tony Connolly (on Twitter) are among the best out there.
Ah right. The one I’m thinking of has Katya Adlar I think her name is? She’s pure unicorns and rainbows. Yet somehow one of BBCs main correspondents on brexit.
Earlier, the People’s Vote campaigner, Bridget Phillipson, was making the point that a confirmatory vote was the best supported option . Her colleague, Chuka Umunna, goes yet further:
"The logical thing in this circumstance would be to put the prospect of leaving the EU with a customs union to the British people in a People’s Vote with the option to remain.
At the moment, there doesn’t seem to be support in the House for a general election because it won’t resolve any of the Brexit chaos, it just delays making a decision."