Re: MLB
Posted: Mon July 25, 2016 2:02 am
Cubs close to picking up Aroldis Chapman. 
I think when your starting SS is 22, your backup is 23, and your starting 2B is under contract for three more years, you can afford to give up someone like that more than a lot of other teams.verb_to_trust wrote:I'm kind of torn. Should they give up their best prospect for a one year rental at a position they aren't even really that weak at? You could argue moving Rondon to setup would strengthen the bullpen significantly but how many times do closers adjust well to change? They are all mentally ill.
Yeah. And I guess they have another middle infield prospect in the minors that is pretty decent. Warren was a total bust and the other minor league bat had a hairline fracture in his leg last year that is apparently still bothering him.philpritchard wrote:I think when your starting SS is 22, your backup is 23, and your starting 2B is under contract for three more years, you can afford to give up someone like that more than a lot of other teams.verb_to_trust wrote:I'm kind of torn. Should they give up their best prospect for a one year rental at a position they aren't even really that weak at? You could argue moving Rondon to setup would strengthen the bullpen significantly but how many times do closers adjust well to change? They are all mentally ill.
Teeeeeekay wrote:I like the fact dea of them getting Chapman, especially if that means he stays off of Washingtons roster.
Not really an impact player, but I like that the Jays picked up Upton to give themselves outfield depth when the Orioles were trying to get him to fill a huge hole in the outfield.@SkitchP wrote:Teeeeeekay wrote:I like the fact dea of them getting Chapman, especially if that means he stays off of Washingtons roster.
This is an interesting point. This year, the trade market is incredibly thin in terms of impact players that are likely to be "sold." So I guess with every overpay to obtain one, you are achieving two things- obtaining the player you want, and making the market even thinner for the other contenders to improve themselves.
He should be fine as a 4th outfielder.philpritchard wrote:Not really an impact player, but I like that the Jays picked up Upton to give themselves outfield depth when the Orioles were trying to get him to fill a huge hole in the outfield.@SkitchP wrote:Teeeeeekay wrote:I like the fact dea of them getting Chapman, especially if that means he stays off of Washingtons roster.
This is an interesting point. This year, the trade market is incredibly thin in terms of impact players that are likely to be "sold." So I guess with every overpay to obtain one, you are achieving two things- obtaining the player you want, and making the market even thinner for the other contenders to improve themselves.
philpritchard wrote:Not really an impact player, but I like that the Jays picked up Upton to give themselves outfield depth when the Orioles were trying to get him to fill a huge hole in the outfield.@SkitchP wrote:Teeeeeekay wrote:I like the fact dea of them getting Chapman, especially if that means he stays off of Washingtons roster.
This is an interesting point. This year, the trade market is incredibly thin in terms of impact players that are likely to be "sold." So I guess with every overpay to obtain one, you are achieving two things- obtaining the player you want, and making the market even thinner for the other contenders to improve themselves.
Yeah, and he's good enough that he lets them rest their regulars without taking a huge hit to the lineup. And the Padres are paying $17 million of the $22 million he's owed between this year and next, so it's a great bargain for the Jays. I expected them to give up more than their ~20th best prospect to get him for that cheap.Electromatic wrote:He should be fine as a 4th outfielder.philpritchard wrote:Not really an impact player, but I like that the Jays picked up Upton to give themselves outfield depth when the Orioles were trying to get him to fill a huge hole in the outfield.@SkitchP wrote:Teeeeeekay wrote:I like the fact dea of them getting Chapman, especially if that means he stays off of Washingtons roster.
This is an interesting point. This year, the trade market is incredibly thin in terms of impact players that are likely to be "sold." So I guess with every overpay to obtain one, you are achieving two things- obtaining the player you want, and making the market even thinner for the other contenders to improve themselves.
75 million dollars doesn't go too far these days.