Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump
Posted: Sun February 15, 2026 9:30 pm
Aw, not Robin Leach.
BurtReynolds wrote:Ironic that the only reason we are talking about the Epstein files is because of Trump voters, even though Trump himself is one of the prime Epstein rapist boys. while Democrat voters were happy to ignore it for over a decade until now.
Funny how it all works out.
I think QAnon was mostly always about people with miserable lives sublimating their misery (and their Christian puritanism) into scapegoating/obsessing over an elite conspiracy. They don't actually care about kids.Dev wrote:the following thought keeps running through my head:
a huge part of Trump's support came from people who wanted to fight abuse against kids
like that is what Qanon was about above all else
and who could argue with that
but Trump a likely sex offended co-opted the movement
now you can't blame people for making a mistake and getting conned
but why can't they admit to themselves, okay I wanted to fight against pedophilia but I accidentally put my trust in a pedophile to lead the movement...
like that would be a hard pill for anyone to swallow, especially because lots of the people who were passionate were probably abused themselves
but I don't see why some people can't admit their mistake(and I'm not talking about the people who never really gave a fuck in the first place)
But also it's kinda interesting because it shows just how easy it is to get conned... like people are stupid... and probably most people can't even intuitively distinguish an evil person when they meet one...
I think I am pretty good at telling a person's character but honestly I have totally fucked this up a few times even recently
Possibly but I also think the most miserable people would be the same people vulnerable to being abused so maybe some people came by the cause honestly. And then yeah, I think the proletariat always tends to be the most religious people too. It doesn't necessarily make sense but it's how it goes.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I think QAnon was mostly always about people with miserable lives sublimating their misery (and their Christian puritanism) into scapegoating/obsessing over an elite conspiracy. They don't actually care about kids.Dev wrote:the following thought keeps running through my head:
a huge part of Trump's support came from people who wanted to fight abuse against kids
like that is what Qanon was about above all else
and who could argue with that
but Trump a likely sex offended co-opted the movement
now you can't blame people for making a mistake and getting conned
but why can't they admit to themselves, okay I wanted to fight against pedophilia but I accidentally put my trust in a pedophile to lead the movement...
like that would be a hard pill for anyone to swallow, especially because lots of the people who were passionate were probably abused themselves
but I don't see why some people can't admit their mistake(and I'm not talking about the people who never really gave a fuck in the first place)
But also it's kinda interesting because it shows just how easy it is to get conned... like people are stupid... and probably most people can't even intuitively distinguish an evil person when they meet one...
I think I am pretty good at telling a person's character but honestly I have totally fucked this up a few times even recently
Heh I was just thinking that last night, but between Russia and Israel. Surely, some foreign country has been able to get the Epstein files.Stickman wrote:![]()
A national security official says Donald Trump is in a catch-22 where Iranians are threatening to release videos of him sexually assaulting children if he bombs them, and Israel is threatening the same if he doesn’t.
"I can destroy the country" quotable was my main takeaway there.Stickman wrote:For once he didn't shit himself while speaking.
just repeats himself about 10 times...
There are people misinterpreting this as him talking about the US. From the context, he’s talking about other countries. Like “I can’t place a tariff on other countries, but I can destroy them.” I mean it’s still fucking nuts, but that’s what he’s talking about.oasisfan35 wrote:"I can destroy the country" quotable was my main takeaway there.Stickman wrote:For once he didn't shit himself while speaking.
just repeats himself about 10 times...
A standing president stating 'he' can "destroy" a country, as those are the words he said, has no place here.Simple Torture wrote:There are people misinterpreting this as him talking about the US. From the context, he’s talking about other countries. Like “I can’t place a tariff on other countries, but I can destroy them.” I mean it’s still fucking nuts, but that’s what he’s talking about.oasisfan35 wrote:"I can destroy the country" quotable was my main takeaway there.Stickman wrote:For once he didn't shit himself while speaking.
just repeats himself about 10 times...