Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed September 05, 2018 12:30 am
this protestor managed to smuggle in a lightsaber@SkitchP wrote:96583UP wrote:cant blame the guy for not shaking that hand the meeting was a semi-riot and he was obv shaken and who the f knows who that guy is and if he plans to knife you aside from it being a normal reflex to find that kind of personal intro super creepy
In a room full of senators for a supreme court hearing I highly doubt that he would be able to bring a knife in.
Oddly enough, they probably wouldn't let him bring a gun in either. Those are just for schools.
maybe he thought they were swinger bracelets and interpreted the handshake as a come-onMcParadigm wrote:
I would guess Kavenaugh has some pro-gun decisions out there? I don't know. I would just assume that if Parkland parents are showing up to protest.simple schoolboy wrote:Do SCOTUS appointees have the ability to bring people back to life?
What exactly was this stunt supposed to mean (also, Hogg has been the face of whatever this movement is, never heard of this guy prior)
I guess if your daughter is killed in a shooting, at least you can monetize it in cable TV compensation?
bune wrote:AKA the Republican playbook.--- wrote:And y'all will bend over backwards to avoid keeping your eye on the ball and according these distractions exactly as much attention as they're worth: zero.Orpheus wrote:Y'all will bend over backwards to avoid calling these cowards and crooks what they really are. Unbelievable.
It really would be something if this hearing could be used as an opportunity to discuss constitutional philosophy or judicial interpretation or the consequences of federalism's erosion on the tension between democracy and the judiciary or any number of ideas worth spending time and energy on.
But no. Cheap political theater is enough.

Imagine having this thought and thinking that it was worth writing down.simple schoolboy wrote:Do SCOTUS appointees have the ability to bring people back to life?
Ah. That explains why I got kicked out of the Doolbs.Bi_3 wrote:Technically that would be “qw” not “wp”
I just wish they'd stop trying to tell pointless anecdotes.McParadigm wrote:Also imagine being a part of the process to approve a United States Supreme Court justice, having finite time to speak, and coming out of the gate with “Who do you admire and why”
Well they did remove the swimsuit portion of the competition.McParadigm wrote:Also imagine being a part of the process to approve a United States Supreme Court justice, having finite time to speak, and coming out of the gate with “Who do you admire and why”
simple schoolboy is the LLS of current events discussionMcParadigm wrote:Imagine having this thought and thinking that it was worth writing down.simple schoolboy wrote:Do SCOTUS appointees have the ability to bring people back to life?
McParadigm wrote:He did.