Page 42 of 94

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Posted: Wed January 27, 2016 3:37 pm
by Green Habit
If Glennon's good enough, then I think the Bucs would be crazy to trade him for peanuts. Ask the Cowboys about the value of a good backup QB. Keep him, force the Cards or whoever to pay him a good amount as a UFA in 2017, and take a compensatory pick from it if you can.

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Posted: Wed January 27, 2016 3:45 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
I could see Glennon succeeding in Houston. I'll be rooting for him whatever happens to him, I like that guy.

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Posted: Wed January 27, 2016 4:05 pm
by nyquillyn
The Cards would probably offer more than "peanuts." I'm guessing they'd give up two picks (2nd and 5th?) for him.

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Posted: Wed January 27, 2016 4:29 pm
by Electromatic
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I could see Glennon succeeding in Houston. I'll be rooting for him whatever happens to him, I like that guy.

I think Houston will get Hackenburg somewhere late in the draft and develop him. I doubt the Bucs will trade Glennon unless they get at least a 2nd rounder. He's still a good cheap backup if I'm correct, and he definitely fits Koetter.


The other thing, I think the Bucs have about 50 million to spend, and they have to spend a great deal of it due to league rules, so why not keep Glennon?

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Posted: Wed January 27, 2016 4:31 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
turned2black wrote:The Cards would probably offer more than "peanuts." I'm guessing they'd give up two picks (2nd and 5th?) for him.
Yeah and the thing about it is, there are many teams that need QB's this year and some that have aging QB's with one or two more years. The position is way overvalued right now so I expect the Bucs could get something pretty substantial for Glennon. There aren't many NFL-ready QBs in the draft this year.

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Posted: Wed January 27, 2016 4:34 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Electromatic wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I could see Glennon succeeding in Houston. I'll be rooting for him whatever happens to him, I like that guy.

I think Houston will get Hackenburg somewhere late in the draft and develop him. I doubt the Bucs will trade Glennon unless they get at least a 2nd rounder. He's still a good cheap backup if I'm correct, and he definitely fits Koetter.


The other thing, I think the Bucs have about 50 million to spend, and they have to spend a great deal of it due to league rules, so why not keep Glennon?
His contract is up next year. Why not get a draft pick or two for him? He certainly won't stay with Tampa if he feels he can go somewhere else next year and start.

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Posted: Wed January 27, 2016 5:09 pm
by Green Habit
turned2black wrote:The Cards would probably offer more than "peanuts." I'm guessing they'd give up two picks (2nd and 5th?) for him.
If they're giving up that much, then a contract extension to go along with it is a must.

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Posted: Wed January 27, 2016 6:44 pm
by Electromatic
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Electromatic wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I could see Glennon succeeding in Houston. I'll be rooting for him whatever happens to him, I like that guy.

I think Houston will get Hackenburg somewhere late in the draft and develop him. I doubt the Bucs will trade Glennon unless they get at least a 2nd rounder. He's still a good cheap backup if I'm correct, and he definitely fits Koetter.


The other thing, I think the Bucs have about 50 million to spend, and they have to spend a great deal of it due to league rules, so why not keep Glennon?
His contract is up next year. Why not get a draft pick or two for him? He certainly won't stay with Tampa if he feels he can go somewhere else next year and start.

I didn't realize this was his last year in that case, yeah, absolutely, probably wouldn't happen until around draft time but yes, that makes a lot of sense.

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Posted: Wed January 27, 2016 10:00 pm
by jwfocker
It would be so nice to be able to trade him for anything between a 2nd to 5th round pick.

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Posted: Thu January 28, 2016 5:43 pm
by Dr. Van Nostrand
the Bucs used a roster spot in all 16 games this year for Ryan Griffin apparently to keep him off the practice squad because they were afraid he would get snatched up by a different team. not sure if that was Lovie wanting to make sure he stayed with the Bucs or Dirk but i have a feeling he is their plan for future back up and if someone wants to give a decent amount then i think this is finally the year they deal Glennon

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Posted: Wed March 09, 2016 7:40 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Muscle Hamster re-signing with the Bucs.

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Posted: Wed March 09, 2016 7:44 pm
by Green Habit
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Muscle Hamster re-signing with the Bucs.
You just lost any hope of getting an autograph from the Douginator/Dougernaut. :haha:

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Posted: Wed March 09, 2016 7:49 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Green Habit wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Muscle Hamster re-signing with the Bucs.
You just lost any hope of getting an autograph from the Douginator/Dougernaut. :haha:
Heh.


I guess I'm glad he's coming back just for the consistency on offense for Jameis Winston. But I really like Sims and would like to see him more involved as he has much better hands than Martin does.

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Posted: Wed March 09, 2016 7:54 pm
by Green Habit
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Muscle Hamster re-signing with the Bucs.
You just lost any hope of getting an autograph from the Douginator/Dougernaut. :haha:
Heh.

I guess I'm glad he's coming back just for the consistency on offense for Jameis Winston. But I really like Sims and would like to see him more involved as he has much better hands than Martin does.
Yeah, you can ironically blame BSU for that--Kellen Moore was so awesome there that they didn't need a RB that could catch well.

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Posted: Wed March 09, 2016 7:57 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
I'm more worried about Mike Evans' catching abilities. He led the league in drops last year and single-handedly cost the Bucs a game because of that. I hope he's working on that this summer.

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Posted: Thu March 10, 2016 11:18 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Bucs signed J.R. Sweezy from Seattle today to replace the retiring Logan Mankins

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Posted: Fri March 11, 2016 6:57 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Great, Bucs signed Brent Grimes. Now we get to deal with that crazy wife.

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Posted: Sat March 12, 2016 2:00 am
by Dr. Van Nostrand
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Great, Bucs signed Brent Grimes. Now we get to deal with that crazy wife.
I didnt get to follow twitter much today so at around 3 when i heard sarah spain say that a team actually signed grimes after talking about how bat shit crazy his wife is i was pretty shocked to hear it was the bucs, i hope he can be a good player for us but damn i hope his wife shuts the hell up lol

Also, bucs signed Robert ayers

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Posted: Sat March 12, 2016 2:02 am
by lennytheweedwhacker
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Great, Bucs signed Brent Grimes. Now we get to deal with that crazy wife.
jameis will be b*nging her in no time

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Posted: Sat March 12, 2016 2:13 am
by E.H. Ruddock
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Great, Bucs signed Brent Grimes. Now we get to deal with that crazy wife.
jameis will be b*nging her in no time
I laughed