Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

General Pearl Jam discussion.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by Strat »

evenslow wrote:How do you not warm up your voice for a heavily promoted performance at the end of PEARL JAM WEEK on a major network?

Ed don't give no fuck!
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42768
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by VinylGuy »

southp wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:I hope they play MYM and Getaway in SNL.
Was there confirmation of an SNL appearance?
Nope.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
Release_Me
AnalLog
Posts: 1269
Joined: Mon July 15, 2013 10:01 am

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by Release_Me »

Strat wrote:
evenslow wrote:How do you not warm up your voice for a heavily promoted performance at the end of PEARL JAM WEEK on a major network?

Ed don't give no fuck!
Either that or the shitty youtube audio quality has me thinking he's better than he actually was. It's very difficult to go from sounding hoarse to singing so well (or vice versa) unless he sounded hoarse because of some temporary issue, i.e. not warming up. Still not sure if Fallon was recorded after this show or before. If it's after, maybe Ed was just exhausted. Though it's still a big difference for a day or two.
Pearl Jam is the only band I'll spend money on.
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by digster »

I think youtube and audience videos in general can cover up issues that may be more apparent on a cleaner recording like Fallon's. The room, as well as the sound quality on the video lets our minds plug the gaps a bit.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by stip »

that's true. On the other hand, the audience copies often add some of the intangibles that get swept out of the cleaner recordings.
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by digster »

That was kind of what I meant (my post was worded pretty poorly). I think it's easier to spot the problems on a show like Fallon than from a IPhone recording on youtube.
gems and rhinestones
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 628
Joined: Sun January 20, 2013 8:02 am

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by gems and rhinestones »

For the last several years, I've thought Ed has sounded a bit off in TV performances. Then on second and third listen, it starts to sound better. By about the fifth time I think he sounds pretty good. So I think my nerves of wanting him to sound great, fucks with my head. I didn't think Sirens sounded very good but now I think it sounds just fine. Weird I know.
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by evenslow »

Just imagine how the 43rd time through will sound.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
User avatar
southp
AnalLog
Posts: 1454
Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 4:22 pm
Location: Montreal

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by southp »

gems and rhinestones wrote:For the last several years, I've thought Ed has sounded a bit off in TV performances. Then on second and third listen, it starts to sound better. By about the fifth time I think he sounds pretty good. So I think my nerves of wanting him to sound great, fucks with my head. I didn't think Sirens sounded very good but now I think it sounds just fine. Weird I know.

I don't know about sounding better over time, but in general a TV performance sounds like crap on a TV, but if you run your audio through a receiver or home theatre then it will sound much fuller with more power behind the guitars/bass.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16263
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by Birds in Hell »

evenslow wrote:Just imagine how the 43rd time through will sound.
:lol:
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16263
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by Birds in Hell »

stip wrote:that's true. On the other hand, the audience copies often add some of the intangibles that get swept out of the cleaner recordings.
I know we've done this to death, but intangibles in this context really means a mix of reverb, volume and simply hearing what your brain expects to hear.

What you hear on something like Fallon or the official boots is the most accurate representation of how Ed actually sung when all those other things are removed.

I haven't really listened to the Sirens performance but Ed's voice certainly is a lot weaker in some respects than it once was, there's no sense pretending otherwise.
digster wrote:I think youtube and audience videos in general can cover up issues that may be more apparent on a cleaner recording like Fallon's. The room, as well as the sound quality on the video lets our minds plug the gaps a bit.
This, basically.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by stip »

Birds in Hell wrote:
stip wrote:that's true. On the other hand, the audience copies often add some of the intangibles that get swept out of the cleaner recordings.
I know we've done this to death, but intangibles in this context really means a mix of reverb, volume and simply hearing what your brain expects to hear.

What you hear on something like Fallon or the official boots is the most accurate representation of how Ed actually sung when all those other things are removed.

I haven't really listened to the Sirens performance but Ed's voice certainly is a lot weaker in some respects than it once was, there's no sense pretending otherwise.
digster wrote:I think youtube and audience videos in general can cover up issues that may be more apparent on a cleaner recording like Fallon's. The room, as well as the sound quality on the video lets our minds plug the gaps a bit.
This, basically.
this may sound stupid but hopefully you know what I mean. How ed physically sounded is only part of the experience. An important part for sure. Obviously the most important part. But not the only part.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36489
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by Jorge »

Rank the metaphysical parts of the experience.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
Release_Me
AnalLog
Posts: 1269
Joined: Mon July 15, 2013 10:01 am

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by Release_Me »

Even taking into account how youtube performances may not be an accurate reflection of how Ed actually sung, you can hear him sound much better than he did on Fallon. He sounded very hoarse there and no matter how distorted the audio may get on phone recordings, the hoarseness can't be completely concealed. There are similar recordings of him on youtube where he does sound hoarse. I'm not judging the performance because this isn't a good enough quality recording but I can at least hear how he sounds. And it's a mystery to me how different it is from Fallon.
Pearl Jam is the only band I'll spend money on.
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by EJ »

I thought he sounded worse on Lightning Bolt.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16263
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by Birds in Hell »

theplatypus wrote:Rank the metaphysical parts of the experience.
:lol:
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by Mine »

Release_Me wrote:Even taking into account how youtube performances may not be an accurate reflection of how Ed actually sung, you can hear him sound much better than he did on Fallon. He sounded very hoarse there and no matter how distorted the audio may get on phone recordings, the hoarseness can't be completely concealed. There are similar recordings of him on youtube where he does sound hoarse. I'm not judging the performance because this isn't a good enough quality recording but I can at least hear how he sounds. And it's a mystery to me how different it is from Fallon.
air conditioning/dry air?
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45826
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by BurtReynolds »

jesus christ what the fuck are you people even talking about?
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by harmless »

Ed sounded bad on TV but we're still trying to determine in what way, and on which song he sounded worse.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Sgt. Crackpot
F.U.B.A.R
Posts: 9104
Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
Location: Lft Craquepeau
Contact:

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by Sgt. Crackpot »

harmless wrote:Ed sounded bad on TV but we're still trying to determine in what way, and on which song he sounded worse.
I think I already posted this, but in all seriousness I have seen so many bands do bad TV appearances, and I think it's because of 2 reasons:

1) It's just one song. The singer has no chance to really warm up. At many concerts, the singer is often warming up during the first song or 2. If you look at the opening song or 2 on most PJ set lists, the songs are probably ideal songs for Ed to warm up his voice, before getting to the songs that push his voice's limits.

2) TV studio climate. I believe that most TV studios are usually purposely cold. The reason that I've heard before, is that it prevents the hosts/guest from sweating off make up and looking all shiny. It also prevents the audience from getting too comfortable and falling asleep during the slow/boring parts of the show.
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour :(
Post Reply