Page 42 of 47
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 12:37 am
by BurtReynolds
heh that was one of the better ones.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 12:39 am
by i got bugs
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Mecca wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Thor is the worst movie you've ever seen?
chris hemsworth is in ghostbusters
That was confusing
Sorry.. the guy that played Thor played a moron and was kinda funny at times.. other than him there were no redeeming qualities
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 12:43 am
by Rangi Guy
i got bugs wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Mecca wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Thor is the worst movie you've ever seen?
chris hemsworth is in ghostbusters
That was confusing
Sorry.. the guy that played Thor played a moron and was kinda funny at times.. other than him there were no redeeming qualities
I hated Hemsworth in this. And for all it's female empowerment that this movie was going for - having the character of Erin Gilbert fawning over him the whole movie was just embarrassing
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 1:20 am
by VinylGuy
They really nailed that honest trailer.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 1:47 am
by epilogue
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 1:50 am
by epilogue
Rangi Guy wrote:i got bugs wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Mecca wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Thor is the worst movie you've ever seen?
chris hemsworth is in ghostbusters
That was confusing
Sorry.. the guy that played Thor played a moron and was kinda funny at times.. other than him there were no redeeming qualities
I hated Hemsworth in this. And for all it's female empowerment that this movie was going for - having the character of Erin Gilbert fawning over him the whole movie was just embarrassing
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 2:00 am
by Rangi Guy
durdencommatyler wrote:Rangi Guy wrote:i got bugs wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Mecca wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Thor is the worst movie you've ever seen?
chris hemsworth is in ghostbusters
That was confusing
Sorry.. the guy that played Thor played a moron and was kinda funny at times.. other than him there were no redeeming qualities
I hated Hemsworth in this. And for all it's female empowerment that this movie was going for - having the character of Erin Gilbert fawning over him the whole movie was just embarrassing
Well the whole movie was embarrassing, but that really stood out to me
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 2:08 am
by epilogue
Rangi Guy wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:Rangi Guy wrote:i got bugs wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Mecca wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Thor is the worst movie you've ever seen?
chris hemsworth is in ghostbusters
That was confusing
Sorry.. the guy that played Thor played a moron and was kinda funny at times.. other than him there were no redeeming qualities
I hated Hemsworth in this. And for all it's female empowerment that this movie was going for - having the character of Erin Gilbert fawning over him the whole movie was just embarrassing
Well the whole movie was embarrassing, but that really stood out to me
And I never, ever say this.... but....
ugh
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 2:59 am
by E.H. Ruddock
Hemsworth was hilarious in this
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 3:00 am
by epilogue
Thank you!
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 3:08 pm
by stip
durdencommatyler wrote:Rangi Guy wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:Rangi Guy wrote:i got bugs wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Mecca wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Thor is the worst movie you've ever seen?
chris hemsworth is in ghostbusters
That was confusing
Sorry.. the guy that played Thor played a moron and was kinda funny at times.. other than him there were no redeeming qualities
I hated Hemsworth in this. And for all it's female empowerment that this movie was going for - having the character of Erin Gilbert fawning over him the whole movie was just embarrassing
Well the whole movie was embarrassing, but that really stood out to me
And I never, ever say this.... but....
ugh
I know, Joey. I know.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 3:19 pm
by Simple Torture
@SkitchP wrote:http://www.ebay.com
search: Amazon Fire Stick with Kodi
The FAQ section in some of those listings is phenomenal:
Can I watch all the new moives and Live TVs and sports?
Can I cut down my cable TV after buy the stick?
My remote is dead?
How to do if the KODI frozen?
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 3:21 pm
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 4:04 pm
by Strat
i agree with that hemsworth post above. i think i mentioned it in my review of the movie. Female Empowerment but they hire him just because he's hot and can eyeball him. Fawning all over him. Kind of goes against that female empowerment in my eyes.
Yes, he was hilarious. And I dont agree with that it was a role reversal with the women only hiring a guy because he is hot is somehow female empowerment.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 7:59 pm
by epilogue
Strat wrote:i agree with that hemsworth post above. i think i mentioned it in my review of the movie. Female Empowerment but they hire him just because he's hot and can eyeball him. Fawning all over him. Kind of goes against that female empowerment in my eyes.
Yes, he was hilarious. And I dont agree with that it was a role reversal with the women only hiring a guy because he is hot is somehow female empowerment.
Because women aren't allowed to find men attractive? Women aren't allowed to be sexual? Yeah, super progressive.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 8:30 pm
by Strat
durdencommatyler wrote:Strat wrote:i agree with that hemsworth post above. i think i mentioned it in my review of the movie. Female Empowerment but they hire him just because he's hot and can eyeball him. Fawning all over him. Kind of goes against that female empowerment in my eyes.
Yes, he was hilarious. And I dont agree with that it was a role reversal with the women only hiring a guy because he is hot is somehow female empowerment.
Because women aren't allowed to find men attractive? Women aren't allowed to be sexual? Yeah, super progressive.
I didnt say that.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 8:34 pm
by bada
Start, Joey just wants a world where both men and woman in power can prey on and objectify the dumb and attractive regardless of gender.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 8:36 pm
by BurtReynolds
bada wrote:Start, Joey just wants a world where both men and woman in power can prey on and objectify the dumb and attractive regardless of gender.
No just the women.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 8:38 pm
by epilogue
Yikes
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 8:42 pm
by bada
BurtReynolds wrote:bada wrote:Start, Joey just wants a world where both men and woman in power can prey on and objectify the dumb and attractive regardless of gender.
No just the women.
Like a super sexy lesbian boss takes advantage of a naive country girl deal? He's not talking about the butch ones right? He's not insane is he?!?!
