Red Mosquito

elliseamos wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:"No matter which side you're on, the funniest thing about the Greenwald/Intercept thing is that if they'd published the piece, no one would have read it and that would be that."

I would have read it and probably shared it on rm somewhere.

Oh well.

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/articl ... n-censored

BurtReynolds wrote:

elliseamos wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:"No matter which side you're on, the funniest thing about the Greenwald/Intercept thing is that if they'd published the piece, no one would have read it and that would be that."

I would have read it and probably shared it on rm somewhere.

Oh well.

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/articl ... n-censored

How long until sleeping giants gets payment processors to blacklist substack?

simple schoolboy wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

elliseamos wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:"No matter which side you're on, the funniest thing about the Greenwald/Intercept thing is that if they'd published the piece, no one would have read it and that would be that."

I would have read it and probably shared it on rm somewhere.

Oh well.

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/articl ... n-censored

How long until sleeping giants gets payment processors to blacklist substack?

Oh you mean the hotbed of racist, misogynist, Russian disinformation?

Probably by next midterms

Norris wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

simple schoolboy wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

elliseamos wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:"No matter which side you're on, the funniest thing about the Greenwald/Intercept thing is that if they'd published the piece, no one would have read it and that would be that."

I would have read it and probably shared it on rm somewhere.

Oh well.

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/articl ... n-censored

How long until sleeping giants gets payment processors to blacklist substack?

Oh you mean the hotbed of racist, misogynist, Russian disinformation?

Probably by next midterms

I understand how they can pressure advertisers with their campaigns. The only thing about payment processors that makes sense is they have true believers on the inside, and terrible leadership. Who is going to boycott mastercard or visa? There are like 4 choices.

BurtReynolds wrote:

elliseamos wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:"No matter which side you're on, the funniest thing about the Greenwald/Intercept thing is that if they'd published the piece, no one would have read it and that would be that."

I would have read it and probably shared it on rm somewhere.

Oh well.

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/articl ... n-censored

Thanks. Having read this and the emails exchanged, this drama really wasn't necessary.

Strange.

elliseamos wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

elliseamos wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:"No matter which side you're on, the funniest thing about the Greenwald/Intercept thing is that if they'd published the piece, no one would have read it and that would be that."

I would have read it and probably shared it on rm somewhere.

Oh well.

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/articl ... n-censored

Thanks. Having read this and the emails exchanged, this drama really wasn't necessary.

Strange.

I'm proud I knew what that gif would be before I clicked it.

simple schoolboy wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

simple schoolboy wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

elliseamos wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:"No matter which side you're on, the funniest thing about the Greenwald/Intercept thing is that if they'd published the piece, no one would have read it and that would be that."

I would have read it and probably shared it on rm somewhere.

Oh well.

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/articl ... n-censored

How long until sleeping giants gets payment processors to blacklist substack?

Oh you mean the hotbed of racist, misogynist, Russian disinformation?

Probably by next midterms

I understand how they can pressure advertisers with their campaigns. The only thing about payment processors that makes sense is they have true believers on the inside, and terrible leadership. Who is going to boycott mastercard or visa? There are like 4 choices.

It's true believers, and contrary to popular belief, they are perfectly happy to sacrifice profits to consolidate power.

I think I will watch One America News tomorrow night for my election coverage viewership.

BurtReynolds wrote:"No matter which side you're on, the funniest thing about the Greenwald/Intercept thing is that if they'd published the piece, no one would have read it and that would be that."

Late to this one but the funniest (best) thing is that Greenwald has been annoying as shit lately (on twitter anyway) and just got ‘canceled’ by the intercept, a place that was fully supportive of the guy. Glenn’s been a bit too angry lately. He needs a timeout. Or maybe just to go away. He wasn’t that good anyway.

hahah ya think?

Note the publication date. I still see people on Nextdoor parroting the line about insurance covering it (most recently regarding shoplifting). This in a town that already lost one retailer and is barely hanging on to a 2nd due to 'loss' issues.

Is looting just the voice of the unheard or...?

simple schoolboy wrote:

Note the publication date. I still see people on Nextdoor parroting the line about insurance covering it (most recently regarding shoplifting). This in a town that already lost one retailer and is barely hanging on to a 2nd due to 'loss' issues.

Is looting just the voice of the unheard or...?

Interesting. Now that Biden won is the NYT going to start covering the reality of the "protests"?

incredible timing!

Goodness progressives are awful:

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/11 ... tself.html