Page 425 of 792

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 20, 2016 2:39 am
by philpritchard
Simple Torture wrote:
:roll:

If he signs in Boston, it's going to be an ugly contract.

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 20, 2016 2:39 am
by Norah
philpritchard wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
:roll:

If he signs in Boston, it's going to be an ugly contract.
Yeah I'm not looking forward to that.

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 20, 2016 2:45 am
by philpritchard
cutuphalfdead wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
:roll:

If he signs in Boston, it's going to be an ugly contract.
Yeah I'm not looking forward to that.
For the record, he's amazing. He's just so damn good. I just think the Jays need him enough that they'll match any reasonable offer and that Boston will have to go over the top to get him (kind of like they did with the Price contract).

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 20, 2016 3:23 am
by verb_to_trust
Hopefully the cubs bats wake up now. Anyway, back to red Sox free agent talk.

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 20, 2016 4:06 am
by philpritchard
Image

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 20, 2016 5:29 am
by Simple Torture
Image
Image

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 20, 2016 1:17 pm
by philpritchard
Image

Re: MLB

Posted: Fri October 21, 2016 2:48 am
by Bammer
Jon Lester obviously doesn't read Playboy.

Corey Seager has way more hair than Kyle Seager.

Re: MLB

Posted: Fri October 21, 2016 11:56 pm
by verb_to_trust
Charlie Sheen would be way better than whatever 'baseball greats' MLB and the Indians are going to trot out.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat October 22, 2016 12:03 am
by CopperTom
LBJ

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat October 22, 2016 12:52 am
by verb_to_trust
Jim Brown?

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat October 22, 2016 2:21 am
by Joesanity
I hope they have Albert Belle come out and run over Fernando Vina instead.

But my money would be on Thome or Lofton.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat October 22, 2016 7:26 pm
by Norah
Just a friendly reminder that the Cleveland Indians have indeed won a championship in the live ball era.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat October 22, 2016 8:22 pm
by numbers
Well, they did win a couple in the 90s. Not a huge drought.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sun October 23, 2016 2:44 am
by E.H. Ruddock
Why could i not watch game 6 of the nlcs on regular tv?

Re: MLB

Posted: Sun October 23, 2016 2:45 am
by Monkey_Driven
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Why could i not watch game 6 of the nlcs on regular tv?
$$$$

Re: MLB

Posted: Sun October 23, 2016 2:46 am
by E.H. Ruddock
That is fucking dumb. History potentially being made and i have to watch on the Internet. Way to go, mlb

Re: MLB

Posted: Sun October 23, 2016 2:47 am
by Norah
The WS will be on broadcast tv.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sun October 23, 2016 3:05 am
by verb_to_trust
Matt Lament

Re: MLB

Posted: Sun October 23, 2016 4:10 am
by spike
:shock: