Red Mosquito

BigRedLedbetter wrote:I had a dream the other night that the Lions would win the central. Then I woke up. Still go to New England and Green Bay. Yeah, wild card. Which I will take. Thought they'd go like 6-10 this year.

Was this dream 13 years ago when the "central" still existed?

Green Habit wrote:

i got bugs wrote:I can't stop watching the gif of the black saints guy stealing the ball off the blondie cincy fan

I'm dying right now

Well don't leave us in the dark, man, post it!

Douchebag of the year award:

She got the ball eventually. He was just trollin'.

Kaius wrote:She got the ball eventually. He was just trollin'.

no she didnt. she got a totally different game ball.

apparently the guy has been a season ticket holder since the superdome opened and felt he was owed that football

Ah. Well, then. They both got game balls. Moving on.

It's hard for me to form an opinion on the Cards. On one hand, they've caught every team they've faced at the perfect time. On the other hand, they been fighting through a ton of injuries themselves.
But it's pretty hard to see a team that has no running game doing well in the playoffs. Ellington's production has plummeted and having an offense that's gonna require Stanton to throw for 300 yards every game is bad news, despite the stellar receiving corps.
The D is fucking legit and Patrick Peterson has been lights out for 3 weeks now. They are also the best-coached team in the NFL and the team chemistry is unbelievable.
I'd still have a hard time believing this team could beat GB in the playoffs... at Lambeau or in PHX, which would essentially be a home game for the Pack anyway.

The idiocy of Lions fans took the fun out of twitter for me

Bell and Brown are such great players and are perfect building blocks for an offense. Such unique, useful talents. Love watching them.

Peterson's suspended the rest of the season.

Biff Pocoroba wrote:Peterson's suspended the rest of the season.

The league and the union are in a real bind with this one. If the NFL didn't do this, the bad PR they would have gotten would have been big--but on the other hand it sure seems like they violated the CBA in doing this. But even if the NFLPA wins a grievance, they risk the bad PR shifting to them. In the end, it may be Peterson himself that needs to resolve this by convincingly demonstrating that what he did was wrong, and that he has made numerous positive steps to correct his behavior.

Green Habit wrote:

Biff Pocoroba wrote:Peterson's suspended the rest of the season.

The league and the union are in a real bind with this one. If the NFL didn't do this, the bad PR they would have gotten would have been big--but on the other hand it sure seems like they violated the CBA in doing this. But even if the NFLPA wins a grievance, they risk the bad PR shifting to them. In the end, it may be Peterson himself that needs to resolve this by convincingly demonstrating that what he did was wrong, and that he has made numerous positive steps to correct his behavior.

do you have any good jokes, GH?

The general cheap pop is... hey great, more time to spend with the family.

Travesty by the NFL.

Alex wrote:

Green Habit wrote:

Biff Pocoroba wrote:Peterson's suspended the rest of the season.

The league and the union are in a real bind with this one. If the NFL didn't do this, the bad PR they would have gotten would have been big--but on the other hand it sure seems like they violated the CBA in doing this. But even if the NFLPA wins a grievance, they risk the bad PR shifting to them. In the end, it may be Peterson himself that needs to resolve this by convincingly demonstrating that what he did was wrong, and that he has made numerous positive steps to correct his behavior.

do you have any good jokes, GH?

Nope, but I have a Deadspin article that hits on some of the concerns that I have.

http://deadspin.com/how-the-nfl-exploit ... 1660155478

Green Habit wrote:

Biff Pocoroba wrote:Peterson's suspended the rest of the season.

The league and the union are in a real bind with this one. If the NFL didn't do this, the bad PR they would have gotten would have been big--but on the other hand it sure seems like they violated the CBA in doing this. But even if the NFLPA wins a grievance, they risk the bad PR shifting to them. In the end, it may be Peterson himself that needs to resolve this by convincingly demonstrating that what he did was wrong, and that he has made numerous positive steps to correct his behavior.

In this sense, I think the league handled it right up until now. They suspended him, the courts did their business now he should be back. Fine him for the time missed as a violation of the conduct but no more games.

This is just going overboard because they botched the issue with Rice.

BurtReynolds wrote:

Green Habit wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:

Green Habit wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:

Green Habit wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:Just because something seems wrong once every 5 years doesn't mean to change the entire system either. Win more games. Win your division.

Who's talking about changing the entire system? By everyone's own admission here this is something that happens rarely, so why would preventing losing teams from at least hosting a playoff game be such a shock to the system?

If a team does what it's supposed to, and win its division, why SHOULDNT they host a playoff game? Because a team with an entirely different schedule has more wins?

Yep.

Then just do away with divisional play all together.

That's fine with me, although I don't think it's necessary.

Are you could go in the other irrational extreme and say that only divisional games count toward winning the division.

A playoff birth without guaranteed home field advantage is a fine reward.

Just keep everything how it is except seed the wildcard teams with better records higher than the divisional winners with worse records.

Spike is right

So then what exactly is the point of divisions?

spike wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

Green Habit wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:

Green Habit wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:

Green Habit wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:Just because something seems wrong once every 5 years doesn't mean to change the entire system either. Win more games. Win your division.

Who's talking about changing the entire system? By everyone's own admission here this is something that happens rarely, so why would preventing losing teams from at least hosting a playoff game be such a shock to the system?

If a team does what it's supposed to, and win its division, why SHOULDNT they host a playoff game? Because a team with an entirely different schedule has more wins?

Yep.

Then just do away with divisional play all together.

That's fine with me, although I don't think it's necessary.

Are you could go in the other irrational extreme and say that only divisional games count toward winning the division.

A playoff birth without guaranteed home field advantage is a fine reward.

Just keep everything how it is except seed the wildcard teams with better records higher than the divisional winners with worse records.

Because it's always so horrible for the Packers to go play in the Georgia Dome in January? I mean that's never worked out.

@SkitchP wrote:So then what exactly is the point of divisions?

Yeah, that's a good point. I revise my original statement. Spike is not right.

Go Broncos