Page 44 of 47
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon January 02, 2017 2:45 am
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon January 02, 2017 2:48 am
by LoathedVermin72
It's the visually illiterate Feig desperately trying to make his movie look like a movie since it has CGI and stuff
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon January 02, 2017 2:54 am
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon January 02, 2017 2:59 am
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon January 02, 2017 3:02 am
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon January 02, 2017 3:09 am
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon January 02, 2017 3:40 am
by VinylGuy
It is the worst thing i saw this year by far. I felt really bad for everyone involved, specially the cast for thinking this movie was hilarious.
Kate McKinnon sucked so hard it was painful to see.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon January 02, 2017 3:48 am
by Kaius
VinylGuy wrote:
Kate McKinnon sucked so hard it was painful to see.
You can leave now. For real this time though.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon January 02, 2017 4:20 pm
by VinylGuy
she is awful. Worst part is that she thinks she is kicking ass.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon January 02, 2017 5:15 pm
by Jorge
McKinnon is hilarious, and the best part of this incredibly mediocre movie
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Tue January 03, 2017 4:54 pm
by epilogue
theplatypus wrote:McKinnon is hilarious, and the best part of this incredibly mediocre movie
Of all the opinions being expressed here, this is the one that is the most right.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Tue January 03, 2017 4:56 pm
by VinylGuy
durdencommatyler wrote:theplatypus wrote:McKinnon is hilarious, and the best part of this incredibly mediocre movie
Of all the opinions being expressed here, this is the one that is the most right.
According to....?
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Tue January 03, 2017 4:58 pm
by epilogue
VinylGuy wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:theplatypus wrote:McKinnon is hilarious, and the best part of this incredibly mediocre movie
Of all the opinions being expressed here, this is the one that is the most right.
According to....?
Well, me, of course. I'm the one who said it.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Tue January 03, 2017 5:04 pm
by VinylGuy
durdencommatyler wrote:VinylGuy wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:theplatypus wrote:McKinnon is hilarious, and the best part of this incredibly mediocre movie
Of all the opinions being expressed here, this is the one that is the most right.
According to....?
Well, me, of course. I'm the one who said it.
Oh.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Tue January 03, 2017 5:05 pm
by Jorge
Also according to me. I would like to vote for my opinion.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Tue January 03, 2017 5:09 pm
by epilogue
theplatypus wrote:Also according to me. I would like to vote for my opinion.
See! It's two against one, VG.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Tue January 03, 2017 5:13 pm
by Kaius
durdencommatyler wrote:theplatypus wrote:Also according to me. I would like to vote for my opinion.
See! It's two against one, VG.
Oh it's a lot worse than that.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Tue January 03, 2017 5:14 pm
by epilogue
Kaius wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:theplatypus wrote:Also according to me. I would like to vote for my opinion.
See! It's two against one, VG.
Oh it's a lot worse than that.
I'm so into everything this thread, it's sickening.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Tue January 03, 2017 6:07 pm
by stip
hey, chris hemsworth was pretty funny in this.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Tue January 03, 2017 8:11 pm
by epilogue
stip wrote:hey, chris hemsworth was pretty funny in this.
Chris Hemsworth is great in this.