I mean, that is a thing, but she plans to basically do what’s best for the smallfolk over anything gBurtReynolds wrote:She murders people over a chair, and thinks she's owed it because of who her dad was.
HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8618
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85153
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
I'm not sure why both can't be true.Kaius wrote:But, so what? I still like her quest for justice. I just don’t know that we can call her noble. Not if Ned Stark is the standard of noble.
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46236
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35957
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
spot on about the constant baiting the viewer/plot armor crap, as well as ending the dead vs the living arc with three episodes left. i hate this episode the more i think about it.dimejinky99 wrote:Apparently this is very good. I haven’t gone to see it
-
JuanHamm
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 6950
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 6:10 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
It's pretty mind blowing that they'd just cast aside the Night King like that.
They got it completely backwards.
They got it completely backwards.
Nihilist lives don't matter
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8618
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
I’m going to let the show resolve before I judge that aspect too harshly
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35957
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Yeah fair enough. This actually makes me hope for a Bran is the NK theory coming true. Previously thought it was stupid - and it is - but it’s one way to keep the mystical aspect going.Mecca wrote:I’m going to let the show resolve before I judge that aspect too harshly
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28128
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Now, why would you ever have a rational take like this?Mecca wrote:I’m going to let the show resolve before I judge that aspect too harshly
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35957
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Somehow, when it’s all said and done, the inevitable fucking Clegane Bowl will have more consequence to this story than the NK.JuanHamm wrote:It's pretty mind blowing that they'd just cast aside the Night King like that.
They got it completely backwards.
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28128
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
How could you say this without seeing the final three episodes?spike wrote:Somehow, when it’s all said and done, the inevitable fucking Clegane Bowl will have more consequence to this story than the NK.JuanHamm wrote:It's pretty mind blowing that they'd just cast aside the Night King like that.
They got it completely backwards.
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8618
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
If I had to guess Jon and Dany die because their forces are diminished from the battle of winterfell, making the NK impactful. Cersei also dies after winning, putting none of the 3 people on the throne we assumed would be ruling, but the long night threat is gone and so is the cruel Cersei, giving us a bittersweet ending
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
What’s the play here?
How do you take over the capital when you really only have two dragons and obviously can’t unleash them on the city?
How do you take over the capital when you really only have two dragons and obviously can’t unleash them on the city?
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37454
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Joey gets it.durdencommatyler wrote:I think it's WAY more complex than that. Reducing all of Dany's motivations and actions to "ruthless" and "obsessed" isn't really accurate or fair. And comparing her to Cersei is crazy, especially in the context of their individual motivations and actions.dimejinky99 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:I guess it’s a moot point cos he’s gonna defer to Dany whatever happens. And she’s lining up to be easily as ruthless as Cersei I’d say.
You’re joking or I have the misunderstand?
You don’t think Dany is obsessed with the throne and that alone ?
If this show turns Dany into a paler, fire-breathing version of Cersei then I'll call bullshit on them. Not saying they won't do it, just that if they do then they aren't actually telling the story, rather they're forcing an outcome that is not supported at all by the text.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
cutuphalfdead wrote:Joey gets it.durdencommatyler wrote:I think it's WAY more complex than that. Reducing all of Dany's motivations and actions to "ruthless" and "obsessed" isn't really accurate or fair. And comparing her to Cersei is crazy, especially in the context of their individual motivations and actions.dimejinky99 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:I guess it’s a moot point cos he’s gonna defer to Dany whatever happens. And she’s lining up to be easily as ruthless as Cersei I’d say.
You’re joking or I have the misunderstand?
You don’t think Dany is obsessed with the throne and that alone ?
If this show turns Dany into a paler, fire-breathing version of Cersei then I'll call bullshit on them. Not saying they won't do it, just that if they do then they aren't actually telling the story, rather they're forcing an outcome that is not supported at all by the text.
Joe doesn’t seem to realise they abandoned the text long ago. or rather they have no text.
To say Dany isn’t ruthless misses a large part of her character. Sure she’s noble and idealistic too, but not when her claim or mission for the throne is challenged.
Ask the tarlys
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37454
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
You can be ruthless and still have a just, noble cause. At least in the context of the late middle ages social structure that this is set in.dimejinky99 wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:Joey gets it.durdencommatyler wrote:I think it's WAY more complex than that. Reducing all of Dany's motivations and actions to "ruthless" and "obsessed" isn't really accurate or fair. And comparing her to Cersei is crazy, especially in the context of their individual motivations and actions.dimejinky99 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:I guess it’s a moot point cos he’s gonna defer to Dany whatever happens. And she’s lining up to be easily as ruthless as Cersei I’d say.
You’re joking or I have the misunderstand?
You don’t think Dany is obsessed with the throne and that alone ?
If this show turns Dany into a paler, fire-breathing version of Cersei then I'll call bullshit on them. Not saying they won't do it, just that if they do then they aren't actually telling the story, rather they're forcing an outcome that is not supported at all by the text.
Joe doesn’t seem to realise they abandoned the text long ago. or rather they have no text.
To say Dany isn’t ruthless misses a large part of her character. Sure she’s noble and idealistic too, but not when her claim or mission for the throne is challenged.
Ask the tarlys
The first thing we saw Ned Stark do was behead a man because he ran for his life.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85153
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
You're a better man that IMecca wrote:I’m going to let the show resolve before I judge that aspect too harshly
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85153
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
For future reference when I say "text" I'm talking only about the show, not the books. Text being a stand-in term for the piece itself.dimejinky99 wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:Joey gets it.durdencommatyler wrote:I think it's WAY more complex than that. Reducing all of Dany's motivations and actions to "ruthless" and "obsessed" isn't really accurate or fair. And comparing her to Cersei is crazy, especially in the context of their individual motivations and actions.dimejinky99 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:I guess it’s a moot point cos he’s gonna defer to Dany whatever happens. And she’s lining up to be easily as ruthless as Cersei I’d say.
You’re joking or I have the misunderstand?
You don’t think Dany is obsessed with the throne and that alone ?
If this show turns Dany into a paler, fire-breathing version of Cersei then I'll call bullshit on them. Not saying they won't do it, just that if they do then they aren't actually telling the story, rather they're forcing an outcome that is not supported at all by the text.
Joe doesn’t seem to realise they abandoned the text long ago. or rather they have no text.
To say Dany isn’t ruthless misses a large part of her character. Sure she’s noble and idealistic too, but not when her claim or mission for the throne is challenged.
Ask the tarlys
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85153
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
cutuphalfdead wrote:You can be ruthless and still have a just, noble cause. At least in the context of the late middle ages social structure that this is set in.dimejinky99 wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:Joey gets it.durdencommatyler wrote:I think it's WAY more complex than that. Reducing all of Dany's motivations and actions to "ruthless" and "obsessed" isn't really accurate or fair. And comparing her to Cersei is crazy, especially in the context of their individual motivations and actions.dimejinky99 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:I guess it’s a moot point cos he’s gonna defer to Dany whatever happens. And she’s lining up to be easily as ruthless as Cersei I’d say.
You’re joking or I have the misunderstand?
You don’t think Dany is obsessed with the throne and that alone ?
If this show turns Dany into a paler, fire-breathing version of Cersei then I'll call bullshit on them. Not saying they won't do it, just that if they do then they aren't actually telling the story, rather they're forcing an outcome that is not supported at all by the text.
Joe doesn’t seem to realise they abandoned the text long ago. or rather they have no text.
To say Dany isn’t ruthless misses a large part of her character. Sure she’s noble and idealistic too, but not when her claim or mission for the throne is challenged.
Ask the tarlys
The first thing we saw Ned Stark do was behead a man because he ran for his life.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
durdencommatyler wrote:For future reference when I say "text" I'm talking only about the show, not the books. Text being a stand-in term for the piece itself.dimejinky99 wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:Joey gets it.durdencommatyler wrote:I think it's WAY more complex than that. Reducing all of Dany's motivations and actions to "ruthless" and "obsessed" isn't really accurate or fair. And comparing her to Cersei is crazy, especially in the context of their individual motivations and actions.dimejinky99 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:I guess it’s a moot point cos he’s gonna defer to Dany whatever happens. And she’s lining up to be easily as ruthless as Cersei I’d say.
You’re joking or I have the misunderstand?
You don’t think Dany is obsessed with the throne and that alone ?
If this show turns Dany into a paler, fire-breathing version of Cersei then I'll call bullshit on them. Not saying they won't do it, just that if they do then they aren't actually telling the story, rather they're forcing an outcome that is not supported at all by the text.
Joe doesn’t seem to realise they abandoned the text long ago. or rather they have no text.
To say Dany isn’t ruthless misses a large part of her character. Sure she’s noble and idealistic too, but not when her claim or mission for the throne is challenged.
Ask the tarlys
I think you’re on the money though. They’re gonna make a hard lurch with her character I reckon.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
