Page 440 of 792

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 05, 2016 11:01 pm
by Simple Torture
Soak it in, Chris. The past week has helped remind me why baseball always has been and always will be the best.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sun November 06, 2016 6:38 pm
by verb_to_trust
Montero whining already. He couldn't have waited a week?

Re: MLB

Posted: Mon November 07, 2016 1:42 pm
by BDB
verb_to_trust wrote:Montero whining already. He couldn't have waited a week?
he is known as a 'great guy/team mate', but this is ridiculous. maybe if he hit over .200 AND could throw to second base he would have played more. STFU and don't let the door hit you in ass.

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu November 17, 2016 12:15 am
by Simple Torture
Kate Upton is flipping out on Twitter and it is glorious.

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu November 17, 2016 12:31 am
by Simple Torture

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu November 17, 2016 12:47 am
by verb_to_trust
He probably would have won if he didn't make us all look at his average as hell penis and jizz shot. Karma is a bitch.

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu November 17, 2016 6:58 pm
by PHATJ
Simple Torture wrote:
*You're

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu November 17, 2016 7:40 pm
by philpritchard
Also, *fewer.

Re: MLB

Posted: Fri November 18, 2016 12:44 am
by philpritchard
I'm genuinely shocked that the voters didn't screw it up this time. Although some of them tried... one voter had Beltre first and Trout seventh. People should have to have some knowledge of the sport they're voting on, shouldn't they?

Re: MLB

Posted: Fri November 18, 2016 1:08 am
by @SkitchP
philpritchard wrote:I'm genuinely shocked that the voters didn't screw it up this time. Although some of them tried... one voter had Beltre first and Trout seventh. People should have to have some knowledge of the sport they're voting on, shouldn't they?

Its actually just a person that wants to boost Beltre's Hall of Fame case.

Re: MLB

Posted: Fri November 18, 2016 2:01 am
by philpritchard
@SkitchP wrote:
philpritchard wrote:I'm genuinely shocked that the voters didn't screw it up this time. Although some of them tried... one voter had Beltre first and Trout seventh. People should have to have some knowledge of the sport they're voting on, shouldn't they?

Its actually just a person that wants to boost Beltre's Hall of Fame case.
That's even dumber than I expected, and it still doesn't explain the best player in the world being 7th.

Re: MLB

Posted: Fri November 18, 2016 2:24 am
by @SkitchP
philpritchard wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
philpritchard wrote:I'm genuinely shocked that the voters didn't screw it up this time. Although some of them tried... one voter had Beltre first and Trout seventh. People should have to have some knowledge of the sport they're voting on, shouldn't they?

Its actually just a person that wants to boost Beltre's Hall of Fame case.
That's even dumber than I expected, and it still doesn't explain the best player in the world being 7th.
I made that up. #FuckGeorgeBell

Re: MLB

Posted: Fri November 18, 2016 4:01 am
by philpritchard
Also, David Ortiz got a first place vote. Heh.

Re: MLB

Posted: Fri November 18, 2016 4:42 am
by Simple Torture
philpritchard wrote:one voter had Beltre first
philpritchard wrote:Also, David Ortiz got a first place vote
chud was allowed to cast 2 ballots?

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu December 01, 2016 6:32 pm
by Biff Pocoroba
Tentative 5 year labor deal in place. As part of the agreement the pennant winner with the best record will have home field advantage in the World Series.

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu December 01, 2016 6:35 pm
by The Argonaut
Biff Pocoroba wrote:Tentative 5 year labor deal in place. As part of the agreement the pennant winner with the best record will have home field advantage in the World Series.
Oh thank god. The AS thing is such a bad idea

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu December 01, 2016 6:45 pm
by numbers
I don't get the vitriol for the ASG thing. I'm not saying it's ideal, but how is it any worse than just alternating years? At least the with ASG method homefield was earned in some respect.

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu December 01, 2016 6:50 pm
by Norah
numbers wrote:I don't get the vitriol for the ASG thing. I'm not saying it's ideal, but how is it any worse than just alternating years? At least the with ASG method homefield was earned in some respect.
I hated the ASG deciding it but I'm with you on this. It was slightly better than the alternating year method, but giving it to the pennant winner with the best record is the best way to go.

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu December 01, 2016 6:55 pm
by The Argonaut
But it's just a funny exhibition game. Players opt out for little nothing reasons. The roster is decided in large part by fans. Pitchers go for at most two innings. Managers try to get their entire roster into the game at some point. Just let it be fun, let's not pretend that it's important.

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu December 01, 2016 6:57 pm
by Norah
Yeah, I get that. There was just this notion that it needed to "go back to how it was before 2002!" but it was decided in a pointless and arbitrary way then too.