Re: Anybody want a Carano?™
Posted: Sat February 27, 2021 4:39 am
Bi_3 wrote:Simple Torture wrote:babes.
Bi_3 wrote:Simple Torture wrote:babes.
Lol that makes it better? Dude you're like 50.Peeps wrote:Do you try to sound so ignorant?verb_to_trust wrote:It's not a lame kids show. Most of RM salivates over this cape shitBammer wrote:Hold on, you can make $8M playing a side character on a lame kids show for half a season?
If Star Wars is anything it is a western on other planets. Very far from superhero cape stuff
Yeah, Peeps. As an adult it's undignified to enjoy things. You should be a miserable cunt like Verb.verb_to_trust wrote:Lol that makes it better? Dude you're like 50.Peeps wrote:Do you try to sound so ignorant?verb_to_trust wrote:It's not a lame kids show. Most of RM salivates over this cape shitBammer wrote:Hold on, you can make $8M playing a side character on a lame kids show for half a season?
If Star Wars is anything it is a western on other planets. Very far from superhero cape stuff
In all seriousness, what is the evidence here? Where are the tweets’/posts that we can see what she said?dimejinky99 wrote:So she targets a hot topic persecuted minority (trans people) for over a year, then when challenged, hides behind her right to have an opinion and uses being criticised for that
.
Anybody on this board can Google “Gina Carano tweets” and see what she wrote. The only point to stomping your foot and demanding that dime post them here (something you could do in a minute) is that you feel it will prove a point....that the tweets “weren’t all that bad,” and that the woke mob is the actual toxic presence here.Bi_3 wrote:In all seriousness, what is the evidence here? Where are the tweets’/posts that we can see what she said?dimejinky99 wrote:So she targets a hot topic persecuted minority (trans people) for over a year, then when challenged, hides behind her right to have an opinion and uses being criticised for that
.
I looked up some more recent photos, and I stand corrected (by myself). Meh.Bammer wrote:I’m trying - and failing - to make sense of this.96583UP wrote:Bammer wrote:Damn right96583UP wrote:if Bammer is mannish you can promptly pencil me down as gayyish
Anyway this thread wouldn’t be 24 pages already if Carano wasn’t really hot.
From what I have seen of her tweets, this seems like hyperbole. Not the long and the short of it at all.dimejinky99 wrote:So she targets a hot topic persecuted minority (trans people) for over a year, then when challenged, hides behind her right to have an opinion and uses being criticised for that And having republican right wing views, comparing it to the plight of persecuted Jews in Nazi germany.
That’s it long and the short of it. And it’s indefensible. It’s not her free speech being attacked. Nor her rights.
It’s thinly veiled hate speech and using actual atrocities as a comparable to her scenario in order to gain further notoriety and to bring clueless morons of a similar mindset to get her back and support her, is just reprehensible.
It’s that simple.
You can't be serious.tragabigzanda wrote:What about if your political opinions put your colleagues at higher risk for transmission of a deadly viral infection ?
You just said more transphobic shit in this thread than she has said in her entire life. And, again, where is the proof that she has been saying the things you claim? You're reduced to falling back on pretending you're a mind reader who knows what she REALLY thinks. You have no fucking idea.dimejinky99 wrote:So she targets a hot topic persecuted minority (trans people) for over a year, then when challenged, hides behind her right to have an opinion and uses being criticised for that And having republican right wing views, comparing it to the plight of persecuted Jews in Nazi germany.
That’s it long and the short of it. And it’s indefensible. It’s not her free speech being attacked. Nor her rights.
It’s thinly veiled hate speech and using actual atrocities as a comparable to her scenario in order to gain further notoriety and to bring clueless morons of a similar mindset to get her back and support her, is just reprehensible.
It’s that simple.
Ps Disney didn’t ‘bow’ to anything. They’re protecting their interests and profit margin. Ffs gay people didn’t exist according to them until mid 90s. You would be escorted from their Parks if you were wearing a pride flag T-shirt or anything like it not that long ago. Cos that’s what good ole American Christian values demanded at the time. The focus has shifted and they can’t be seen to ally with hate groups or a far right ideology, so they fired her.
It certainly was not ‘bowing’ to any one or any pressure from people.
You’re an idiot if you think that’s the case.
Yes, she is, in fact, and I don't recognize your authority to determine where someone's speech "poses an actual threat to peoples lives or health". And legally speaking, speech that isn't allowed in the US is very rigidly defined and her comments in no way comes close to meeting that criteria. You have no idea what you're talking about.dimejinky99 wrote: She’s not allowed wave them around if theyre bigoted and pose an actual threat to peoples lives or health,
this is a myth.dimejinky99 wrote: either through anti trans violence (on the rise in the US in particular)
You really want to base free speech on only that which is based on decency? As decided by who? You get a little power and suddenly you think that you'll have you hand on the censor button forever. You have absolutely no idea what free speech means. It's absolutely not based on "decency" lol. Quite the opposite.dimejinky99 wrote: Especially while representing a company. Fine it doesn’t happen that way in Norway. It does in other places though. Europe and the US in particular. Everywhere has a social media policy. Most people have common sense and decency.
Good luck with that lawsuit, but you seem to be saying here that Disney has to fire her for liability reasons. Does that suggest that you think its ridiculous for Disney to have these liabilities? Of course it is, but even in sue happy America, Disney isn't liable for someone's private tweets.dimejinky99 wrote:
‘Family sue Disney and Lucasfilm after daughters death due to covid when Mandalorian Star Gina coranos anti mask tweets lead to her refusing to wear them. Corano was a hero to the Daughter and followed every word she said’
Some version of that headline could have easily happened. It’s America. They sue for hundreds of millions if you as much as look at them sideways.
This argument can be used by anyone to stifle speech. The bar for proof here is so low, it doesn't exist at all. You could argue that anything anyone says could hypothetically lead to violence without needing to prove any causality whatsoever. Instant, evidence free justification! Again, you have no idea what free speech means or why it's protected.[/quote]dimejinky99 wrote: Equally, her anti trans tweets could bring about any of her considerable fan base attacking trans people. That crowd aren’t exactly the smartest or most reasonable. See the capitol riots (which she cheered on) for evidence.
nope. That's not the line!dimejinky99 wrote: Have your shitty opinions. Fine. You don’t get to put others in danger with them. That’s all. That’s the line. And she crossed it repeatedly even after being asked to stop.
A crucial point you and others seem to be missing or ignoring.
Words are the worse violence there is in the 21st century. Biden dropping bombs on Brown people, barely makes the news. But words, those are the true violence we have to stamp out.verb_to_trust wrote:Wait people are in danger because of her tweets?
Seems to me that an RM board user has made a claim that bi_3 would like them to back up. The tweets weren't, in fact, "all that bad", and dime is proof that at least to some degree, the woke mob does exist.McParadigm wrote:Anybody on this board can Google “Gina Carano tweets” and see what she wrote. The only point to stomping your foot and demanding that dime post them here (something you could do in a minute) is that you feel it will prove a point....that the tweets “weren’t all that bad,” and that the woke mob is the actual toxic presence here.Bi_3 wrote:In all seriousness, what is the evidence here? Where are the tweets’/posts that we can see what she said?dimejinky99 wrote:So she targets a hot topic persecuted minority (trans people) for over a year, then when challenged, hides behind her right to have an opinion and uses being criticised for that
.
Again, no one seems to be claiming Disney doesn't have a "right" to fire her.McParadigm wrote:
But the thing is, the woke mob didn’t fire anyone. Disney fired Gina Carano. And as it stands, Disney has the right to fire Gina Carano for saying trans people “need to find less abusive representation,” or for publicly commenting on Jeffrey Epstein’s death, or saying there was mass voter fraud in a presidential election. These are things that a company like Disney has every right to fire her for saying, especially after they had a ‘come to Jesus’ discussion with her and she continued doing it.
One small thing is to at least speak out against it. To refuse to normalize the practice. And not deflect with "what's the big deal!? It's just an actress" and "no one complains until it happens to a conservative".McParadigm wrote:
So the point is, as long as corporations CAN fire you for a tweet, they will. Any tool they are permitted to use, they will use. The question remains the same as it was on page one: what do you, a person who believes this firing was wrong, think should be done to stop this from happening? What preventative change should be advocated for?