Red Mosquito

The "holes" or conveniences are often out down to the mysterious ways of the force.

stip wrote:Star Wars was meaningful character arcs and breathtakingly imaginative visuals. The stories (even the great movies) were always simplistic and full of holes. I hold out hope Rian Johnson gives us all 3, but given the nature of the series the plot will always be the least important piece

I feel so much better about him knowing JJ is executive producer. I also wonder if they will continue following the template and Episode 8 be more along the lines of Empire in terms of moodiness/darkness/characterization.

Most importantly - I really hope they figure out a new weapon for the bad guys. This is getting ridiculous.

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:just finished attack of the clones...not as terrible as i remembered (excluding hayden christensen and portman,of course)

Did you manage to stay awake during all the Galactic Senate bullshit, or the "romance"?

Sgt. Crackpot wrote:The "holes" or conveniences are often out down to the mysterious ways of the force.

Sarge, hey. Did you love it?

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

stip wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

stip wrote:The story is riddled with conveniences but the feel is perfect and the characters are wonderful (according to everyone on the planet except LV and the people at national review who are upset that the leads are a woman who didn't need to be rescued and a black man who isn't a backstabbing sexual predator) so you can forgive the story (as is often the case with the OT which is similarly drowning in plot conviences) . It's a very good movie and a great Star Wars movie

I like how stip assumes Armond White is a racist

I'm sure he has a black friend

stip, he is black.

Well that makes it easier for him!

Strat wrote:

Sgt. Crackpot wrote:The "holes" or conveniences are often out down to the mysterious ways of the force.

Sarge, hey. Did you love it?

Hey Strat. Yeah, I really loved it and enjoyed it. Really looking forward to seeing it with my kids. Apart from seeing old favourite characters used well, the flow of the movie was solid and entertaining.

In for my fourth viewing.

Sgt. Crackpot wrote:

Strat wrote:

Sgt. Crackpot wrote:The "holes" or conveniences are often out down to the mysterious ways of the force.

Sarge, hey. Did you love it?

Hey Strat. Yeah, I really loved it and enjoyed it. Really looking forward to seeing it with my kids. Apart from seeing old favourite characters used well, the flow of the movie was solid and entertaining.

Im glad you loved it! I agree and the new characters were a joy to watch.

dimejinky99 wrote:In for my fourth viewing.

awesome

Sgt. Crackpot wrote:

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:just finished attack of the clones...not as terrible as i remembered (excluding hayden christensen and portman,of course)

Did you manage to stay awake during all the Galactic Senate bullshit, or the "romance"?

there wasn't that much galactic senate stuff in this one

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:

Sgt. Crackpot wrote:

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:just finished attack of the clones...not as terrible as i remembered (excluding hayden christensen and portman,of course)

Did you manage to stay awake during all the Galactic Senate bullshit, or the "romance"?

there wasn't that much galactic senate stuff in this one

Sounds like the theatrical version. The Blu ray version has tonnes of extra scenes added for extra boredom value.

I'm watching the spoiler review by the Collider Videos guys on Youtube. Good stuff so far. I like their enthusiasm

Seeing this again tomorrow with dad, brother, and uncle. And booked to see it with the girlfriend again on Boxing Day. Good times.

I like all the political minutiae in the prequels. Way more interesting than anything in TFA.

LoathedVermin72 wrote:I like all the political minutiae in the prequels. Way more interesting than anything in TFA.

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

you have GOT to be kidding me.

can you link it? I'm searching and unable to find it for some reason

Attack of the Clones is god-awful. I generally find something to like in most movies I watch, but this one makes it real hard.

There's so many great actors and actresss in this and they're all terrible. Portman, Jackson, McGregor etc. How do you take such a good cast and churn out such crap?

Also, George Lucas was always very open about the fact that he knew he wasn't a great writer. So when he decided to write all thee prequels, why did nobody cut him off at the pass and tell him that he really shouldn't? He can't write dialogue for humans. The 'romance' between Padme and Anakin is the worst crap I've ever watched. It's painful to watch.

Revenge of the Sith is ok, I guess.

i never bought anakin's dark side turn in the prequels

Strat wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:I like all the political minutiae in the prequels. Way more interesting than anything in TFA.

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

you have GOT to be kidding me.

You know, this actually explains all.

stip wrote:can you link it? I'm searching and unable to find it for some reason

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:i never bought anakin's dark side turn in the prequels

Yeah, it just came across as a moody teenager sulking and whining about everything.

Games Radar wrote an interesting article about how Lucas almost wrote the perfect trilogy. It goes into how the prequels should've gone down. Good read.

http://www.gamesradar.com/george-lucas- ... em-notice/