Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Posted: Wed August 28, 2013 2:55 pm
It's just red dot.WtOB? wrote:they're just words
It's just red dot.WtOB? wrote:they're just words
i know palharmless wrote:It's just red dot.WtOB? wrote:they're just words
WtOB? wrote:i know palharmless wrote:It's just red dot.WtOB? wrote:they're just words
On that last point: it's still kind of an interesting choice considering that Ed hasn't been above fucking up a line's meter to fit extra words. It's pretty crass how he does it.stupidmop wrote:I dont mind it in big wave because its mostly a silly song and if you try to sing it 'a' crustacean it fucks up the whole line.
I fear Swallowed Whole might be another love songsouthp wrote:PJ songs entitled Yellow Moon and Swallowed Whole both get me excited.
Hopefully the video for that one features another glory hole.Lounge Lizard wrote:I fear Swallowed Whole might be another love songsouthp wrote:PJ songs entitled Yellow Moon and Swallowed Whole both get me excited.
harmless wrote:I can imagine Ed just stuck 'something else' there as a placeholder while he wrote the lyrics, he just couldn't think of a better line so left it.
Yeah my problem is to me, the delivery doesn't match the idea that its lazy or tossed of. We've definitley had this conversation before btwharmless wrote: I think "...or we could do something else" sounds three times as serious, so three times as silly. I think in conversation, it would be delivered in a very lazy way: "or, well, we could... somethin' else." As if the speaker can't really think of the rest of the words, or is saying "...anything but this."
mcparadigms theory is looking better and better...Heathen wrote:Hopefully the video for that one features another glory hole.Lounge Lizard wrote:I fear Swallowed Whole might be another love songsouthp wrote:PJ songs entitled Yellow Moon and Swallowed Whole both get me excited.
Yeah. Ed, please stop 1) cramming too many words into a line and 2) using not enough of them to make sense. The English language kind of dictates the amount of words generally considered appropriate in any given sentence. (See what I did there? The "kind of" here is deliberately superfluous.)theplatypus wrote:On that last point: it's still kind of an interesting choice considering that Ed hasn't been above fucking up a line's meter to fit extra words. It's pretty crass how he does it.stupidmop wrote:I dont mind it in big wave because its mostly a silly song and if you try to sing it 'a' crustacean it fucks up the whole line.
This album will be entirely full of cheesy love ditties, apart from MYM, which was written in a singular moment of rage.stupidmop wrote:mcparadigms theory is looking better and better...Heathen wrote:Hopefully the video for that one features another glory hole.Lounge Lizard wrote:I fear Swallowed Whole might be another love songsouthp wrote:PJ songs entitled Yellow Moon and Swallowed Whole both get me excited.
... resulting from not getting enough head?harmless wrote:This album will be entirely full of cheesy love ditties, apart from MYM, which was written in a singular moment of rage.stupidmop wrote:mcparadigms theory is looking better and better...Heathen wrote:Hopefully the video for that one features another glory hole.Lounge Lizard wrote:I fear Swallowed Whole might be another love songsouthp wrote:PJ songs entitled Yellow Moon and Swallowed Whole both get me excited.
pnjguy wrote:I like the artwork, i really do, but it has no affect on if i think the music is any better than i thought before i saw the artwork.
harmless wrote:The English language kind of dictates the amount of words generally considered appropriate in any given sentence.
your ability to compartmentalize is astoundingpnjguy wrote:I like the artwork, i really do, but it has no affect on if i think the music is any better than i thought before i saw the artwork.
Unfortunately for me it does. I know, it's a tick I have. To me the album is the entire package, and that's a good part of why S/T and Backspacer didn't hang together for me.pnjguy wrote:I like the artwork, i really do, but it has no affect on if i think the music is any better than i thought before i saw the artwork.
I am presently in agreeance with Stip's reconfiguration of my prior parsing of said melodic statement.harmless wrote:No, we're agreeing for sure. I just like it more I think (or maybe just tolerate it more).stip wrote:I don't think you guys are disagreeing.stupidmop wrote:I think they just thought it'd be a fun thing to do on the internet. Imagine no code out now, thered probably be some bizzare scavenger hunt thing.
So you think he's saying we could leave it up to god (will it to the sky) and we'll be fucked, or we could..uh...something else...i guess, not offering up any alternative? Cause i think hes saying or we could get up and actually do something ourselves as an alternative to leaving to a higher power. Which he realized after becoming 'self realized and metaphysically redeemed'. I dunno i dont really like that entire chorus. Damned catchy though.harmless wrote:There's no other explanation than sarcasm. He just doesn't deliver it sarcastically, which, I don't know, might be a case of double irony. That's how I've come to appreciate it; it's a dashed-off, resigned "or we could...", but he sings it with sincerity. Irony on top of irony.stupidmop wrote:This is my interpretation, but I hate the line 'or we could something else' . It worked when I assumed it was sarcastic and tossed off. But I don't think that's what he was going for anymore. Idk why he didn't put the word 'do' in there, it could have fit.stip wrote:Blenheim Augustine wrote:The video changed my view of that line - in the video it seems that he is pointing out the idiocy of people who engage in self-redemption and self-help i.e. attempt to fix their inside world (metaphysical), but do nothing about the outside world (physical). This changes the "Right around the corner could be bigger than ourselves" to being about this earth rather than the possibility of heaven. We could will it to happen and create a better world here (physical redemption) or we could something else - war, environmental collapse etc.stip wrote:it implies something beyond the physical. it doesnt have to be god although that is the easiest/obvious/relevant connection to makrharmless wrote:No?McParadigm wrote:No, it doesn't.harmless wrote:'Metaphysical' implies God, and that's not what he means.
I basically agree. Slightly different interpretation of that last lyric ( we can put our faith in god-will it to the sky- which will do nothing but ensure collapse, or we could get to work
As for dropping the word 'do', well, Ed drops words all the time; he's been doing that since he used to be crustacean.
the important thing is that if you add them all up together it is precisely the right amount of words.harmless wrote:Yeah. Ed, please stop 1) cramming too many words into a line and 2) using not enough of them to make sense. The English language kind of dictates the amount of words generally considered appropriate in any given sentence. (See what I did there? The "kind of" here is deliberately superfluous.)theplatypus wrote:On that last point: it's still kind of an interesting choice considering that Ed hasn't been above fucking up a line's meter to fit extra words. It's pretty crass how he does it.stupidmop wrote:I dont mind it in big wave because its mostly a silly song and if you try to sing it 'a' crustacean it fucks up the whole line.
it adds to the total context in which you hear the music, in the same way that attaching a song to a particular experience changes the way you hear it, for better or worse.harmless wrote:Unfortunately for me it does. I know, it's a tick I have. To me the album is the entire package, and that's a good part of why S/T and Backspacer didn't hang together for me.pnjguy wrote:I like the artwork, i really do, but it has no affect on if i think the music is any better than i thought before i saw the artwork.