Song of the Moment: Sirens

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

So...Sirens?

5 stars
47
38%
4 stars
30
24%
3 stars
25
20%
2 stars
7
6%
1 star
16
13%
 
Total votes: 125

User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85155
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by epilogue »

Man, I haven't taroted in an age!
AllNiteThing
A Return To Form
Posts: 187
Joined: Mon July 15, 2013 7:26 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by AllNiteThing »

Thejambi wrote:
IlluminEddie wrote:
Thejambi wrote:[Backspacer had the shit promoted out of it with 2 radio "hits". Much , much, much more so than Riot Act. Doesn't not mean it ranks higher than RA except for success. .
IlluminEddie wrote: So, you're saying Riot Act didn't have any hits? I agree. That could be one reason it sucks.
Thejambi wrote:I am not a Riot Act fan . It is not a radio album. I like Backspacer better but I'd have to say the quality of the songs on RA are better.
First, we were discussing sales as a proxy for ranking albums. He thought it wasn't a good one and I asked to suggest better. I said a survey would probably best. There was no response to that, but then (as one can see above) it was implied that the only reason Backspacer had better sales was because of “hits”. I responded that yeh - RA didn’t have any hits. Then somehow the quality factor was brought into play, he claimed the quality was better on RA.

So, yes, I still say there was an implication within the entire context that radio hits are NOT synonymous with high quality. At the very least this was implied with Backspacer. So, to find out, I asked the question using another example with Adele (rolling in the deep example), which was ignored.

That's pretty much where we are.

I say - anyone who thinks songs are higher quality because they played less on the radio is an idiot. And further anyone who thinks an album is higher quality because it has no radio hits is an idiot too.
I'll break it down:
Sales do not equate quality as you have suggested.
Backspacer sold more because it was promoted more and had radio success.
I think Riot Act is a more quality album in terms of musicianship.
I just happen to enjoy Backspacer more for the qualities that made it more radio friendly.
I don't always like more radio friendly attributes but in this case I do.
If I was asked to rank based on quality I would put RA ahead .
If I was asked which I enjoyed more to listen to it would be BS.

Is that better?

You forgot Adele.
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Lament »

Look out guys. IlluminEddie is going Galt.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
gems and rhinestones
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 628
Joined: Sun January 20, 2013 8:02 am

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by gems and rhinestones »

The whole album sales thing is ignorant. I think anyone who thinks album sales is what makes an album good should be banned by Stip immediately. Or at the very least forced to listen to Po & the 4Fathers on repeat til Lightning Bolt comes out.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by harmless »

News just in: IlluminEddie was just kidding about everything.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
hlniv
Future Drummer
Posts: 3098
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by hlniv »

All you people are crazy. Just swimmin' in it.

I give up on trying to keep up with this thread. Glad the song's out so I don't have to anymore.
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

i feel like i am happy i wasnt around during all that stuff
User avatar
Heathen
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3988
Joined: Wed January 30, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Heathen »

AllNiteThing wrote:
Thejambi wrote:
IlluminEddie wrote:
Thejambi wrote:[Backspacer had the shit promoted out of it with 2 radio "hits". Much , much, much more so than Riot Act. Doesn't not mean it ranks higher than RA except for success. .
IlluminEddie wrote: So, you're saying Riot Act didn't have any hits? I agree. That could be one reason it sucks.
Thejambi wrote:I am not a Riot Act fan . It is not a radio album. I like Backspacer better but I'd have to say the quality of the songs on RA are better.
First, we were discussing sales as a proxy for ranking albums. He thought it wasn't a good one and I asked to suggest better. I said a survey would probably best. There was no response to that, but then (as one can see above) it was implied that the only reason Backspacer had better sales was because of “hits”. I responded that yeh - RA didn’t have any hits. Then somehow the quality factor was brought into play, he claimed the quality was better on RA.

So, yes, I still say there was an implication within the entire context that radio hits are NOT synonymous with high quality. At the very least this was implied with Backspacer. So, to find out, I asked the question using another example with Adele (rolling in the deep example), which was ignored.

That's pretty much where we are.

I say - anyone who thinks songs are higher quality because they played less on the radio is an idiot. And further anyone who thinks an album is higher quality because it has no radio hits is an idiot too.
I'll break it down:
Sales do not equate quality as you have suggested.
Backspacer sold more because it was promoted more and had radio success.
I think Riot Act is a more quality album in terms of musicianship.
I just happen to enjoy Backspacer more for the qualities that made it more radio friendly.
I don't always like more radio friendly attributes but in this case I do.
If I was asked to rank based on quality I would put RA ahead .
If I was asked which I enjoyed more to listen to it would be BS.

Is that better?

You forgot Adele.
As did everyone else.
cutuphalfdead wrote:so glad i don't see signatures
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Thejambi »

Adele is phenomenal .
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Lament »

durdencommatyler wrote:Man, I haven't taroted in an age!
One of my freelance gigs this summer was writing about tarot cards for some psychic website. I'd never taroted before, and writing about that shit made me realize why.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52023
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Hey chud, remember viper271 during the Backspacer days? Doesn't IlluminEddie remind you of him?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
broken iris
Future Drummer
Posts: 2868
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:24 pm
Location: Death Machine Inc's HQ

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by broken iris »

What would Adele think about Sirens?
the sentinel remains vigilant
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by McParadigm »

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:i feel like i am happy
So, it could be a trick, then?
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37455
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Norah »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:Hey chud, remember viper271 during the Backspacer days? Doesn't IlluminEddie remind you of him?
oh shi-
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by stip »

dimejinky99 wrote:Stip

Pearl jam have just written a bigger anthem than their flagship anthem 'Alive'

Your rebuttal
I don't think I like what you're implying
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Thejambi »

McParadigm wrote:
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:i feel like i am happy
So, it could be a trick, then?
All signs point to yes.
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
AllNiteThing
A Return To Form
Posts: 187
Joined: Mon July 15, 2013 7:26 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by AllNiteThing »

broken iris wrote:What would Adele think about Sirens?

It hasn't sold as much as Last Kiss, so it sucks.
gems and rhinestones
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 628
Joined: Sun January 20, 2013 8:02 am

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by gems and rhinestones »

broken iris wrote:What would Adele think about Sirens?
Who cares I only want to know what would Molly Ringwald think of Sirens?
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85155
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by epilogue »

Lament wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Man, I haven't taroted in an age!
One of my freelance gigs this summer was writing about tarot cards for some psychic website. I'd never taroted before, and writing about that shit made me realize why.
What? Are you against fun or something?
Spoiler: show
:mrgreen:
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Lament »

gems and rhinestones wrote:
broken iris wrote:What would Adele think about Sirens?
Who cares I only want to know what would Molly Ringwald think of Sirens?
Image
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
Post Reply