Page 46 of 54
Re: First Single from #10: Mind Your Manners
Posted: Mon July 08, 2013 9:10 pm
by epilogue
evenslow wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:evenslow wrote:The more drum talk the better.
I read this like five times trying to squeeze the word "drunk" into it. Not sure what that says about me.
yor durnk
Yu tak thaaaa bcak!
Re: First Single from #10: Mind Your Manners
Posted: Mon July 08, 2013 9:12 pm
by Walker Bait
durdencommatyler wrote:harmless wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:harmless wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:Both clips(if they're different songs?) sound good. Hate the drum sound though.
Same, but I think I've felt like that on the whole since Riot Act.
What bugs you about the drums on Riot Act?
No, sorry, I mean Riot Act was the last album I was 100% happy with drum-sound wise. The problem here is basically the same problem as S/T; there's no resonance on the snare drum (or the bass drum); they're flat, like cardboard. I also don't like Matt's obsession with the ride cymbal, I think it takes away from the heaviness of the song. I'm a traditionalist in that I like it when heavy rock thrashes around on the hi-hat. Matt seems to be loathe to do that, strangely. Incidentally, this was an issue I had with the recorded version of You Are for a while -- that Matt didn't open the hi-hat during the choruses -- but I decided it was OK due to its uniqueness, and that maybe it wasn't trying to be the giant rock song I thought. Maybe that's true of this one as well?
That makes total sense to me.
You explain yourself really well, thanks for that. But additionally, do you think the overall mixing/production quality of S/T and Backspacer contributes to what you're hearing/disliking? Or is it just the more technical stuff?
If I may interject for a moment...I found S/T and Backspacer to be a little too "clean". I also thought it just sounded flat, especially the drums. I thought it was just me. That clip they played seems to have a much fuller sound, I'm hoping this is true of the whole album.
Re: First Single from #10: Mind Your Manners
Posted: Mon July 08, 2013 9:13 pm
by its_not_1974
harmless wrote:Who was it that mentioned GY!BE? I can hear that in the atmospheric first track, and it's got me wondering whether, when Mike (?) called the new music "experimental", he might've been referring to a post-rock style. If there was an obvious contemporary style for PJ to try next, post-rock might be it.
Ever since that Nagoya Improv, I have been aching for this exploration.
Re: First Single from #10: Mind Your Manners
Posted: Mon July 08, 2013 9:14 pm
by epilogue
Walker Bait wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:harmless wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:harmless wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:Both clips(if they're different songs?) sound good. Hate the drum sound though.
Same, but I think I've felt like that on the whole since Riot Act.
What bugs you about the drums on Riot Act?
No, sorry, I mean Riot Act was the last album I was 100% happy with drum-sound wise. The problem here is basically the same problem as S/T; there's no resonance on the snare drum (or the bass drum); they're flat, like cardboard. I also don't like Matt's obsession with the ride cymbal, I think it takes away from the heaviness of the song. I'm a traditionalist in that I like it when heavy rock thrashes around on the hi-hat. Matt seems to be loathe to do that, strangely. Incidentally, this was an issue I had with the recorded version of You Are for a while -- that Matt didn't open the hi-hat during the choruses -- but I decided it was OK due to its uniqueness, and that maybe it wasn't trying to be the giant rock song I thought. Maybe that's true of this one as well?
That makes total sense to me.
You explain yourself really well, thanks for that. But additionally, do you think the overall mixing/production quality of S/T and Backspacer contributes to what you're hearing/disliking? Or is it just the more technical stuff?
If I may interject for a moment...I found S/T and Backspacer to be a little too "clean". I also thought it just sounded flat, especially the drums. I thought it was just me. That clip they played seems to have a much fuller sound, I'm hoping this is true of the whole album.
Clean and thin, I agree. S/T more so.
Re: First Single from #10: Mind Your Manners
Posted: Mon July 08, 2013 10:04 pm
by Jorge
Sounds like Foo Fighters.
Re: First Single from #10: Mind Your Manners
Posted: Mon July 08, 2013 10:36 pm
by Sgt. Crackpot
Walker Bait wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:harmless wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:harmless wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:Both clips(if they're different songs?) sound good. Hate the drum sound though.
Same, but I think I've felt like that on the whole since Riot Act.
What bugs you about the drums on Riot Act?
No, sorry, I mean Riot Act was the last album I was 100% happy with drum-sound wise. The problem here is basically the same problem as S/T; there's no resonance on the snare drum (or the bass drum); they're flat, like cardboard. I also don't like Matt's obsession with the ride cymbal, I think it takes away from the heaviness of the song. I'm a traditionalist in that I like it when heavy rock thrashes around on the hi-hat. Matt seems to be loathe to do that, strangely. Incidentally, this was an issue I had with the recorded version of You Are for a while -- that Matt didn't open the hi-hat during the choruses -- but I decided it was OK due to its uniqueness, and that maybe it wasn't trying to be the giant rock song I thought. Maybe that's true of this one as well?
That makes total sense to me.
You explain yourself really well, thanks for that. But additionally, do you think the overall mixing/production quality of S/T and Backspacer contributes to what you're hearing/disliking? Or is it just the more technical stuff?
If I may interject for a moment...I found S/T and Backspacer to be a little too "clean". I also thought it just sounded flat, especially the drums. I thought it was just me. That clip they played seems to have a much fuller sound, I'm hoping this is true of the whole album.
The problem with these albums, more-so S/T than Backspacer, was the production and mastering. The end result was that they used compression mastering to emphasize the 'loudness' of the music, i.e.
everything is loud. This means a lot of 'clipping' occurs, cutting out some of the top and bottom end of the sound. Sadly they do this to a lot of music these days, and little part of me died inside when I realised PJ were doing it too.
To my ears I love dynamic mastering, where the music breathes, and there loudness and softness are both allowed. PJ's earlier albums used this method more, such as Riot Act and Ten specifically. The sound is fuller, roomier and has an inherent smooth quality to it.
To get technical here, if you look at the waveforms of the songs they would look like this:
Compressed:
Dynamic:

Re: First Single from #10: Mind Your Manners
Posted: Mon July 08, 2013 10:41 pm
by evenslow
Sgt. Crackpot wrote:
The problem with these albums, more-so S/T than Backspacer, was the production and mastering. The end result was that they used compression mastering to emphasize the 'loudness' of the music, i.e.
everything is loud. This means a lot of 'clipping' occurs, cutting out some of the top and bottom end of the sound. Sadly they do this to a lot of music these days, and little part of me died inside when I realised PJ were doing it too.
To my ears I love dynamic mastering, where the music breathes, and there loudness and softness are both allowed. PJ's earlier albums used this method more, such as Riot Act and Ten specifically. The sound is fuller, roomier and has an inherent smooth quality to it.
To get technical here, if you look at the waveforms of the songs they would look like this:
Compressed:
Dynamic:

I've always wondered why the "viva la vinyl" guys went in for the compression thing. Has anyone heard the band talk about this? It would seem to me like something they'd be passionate about.
Re: First Single from #10: Mind Your Manners
Posted: Mon July 08, 2013 11:01 pm
by elliseamos
can somebody isolate (or tell me how to isolate) the two separate parts of the tour announcement video?
i'd like to play that ambient part on repeat as i lick batteries this evening.
thnx!

Re: First Single from #10: Mind Your Manners
Posted: Mon July 08, 2013 11:02 pm
by @SkitchP
I adore the fact that harmless has a RisingTides quote in his signature
Re: First Single from #10: Mind Your Manners
Posted: Mon July 08, 2013 11:03 pm
by epilogue
@SkitchP wrote:I adore the fact that harmless has a RisingTides quote in his signature
You can take this post and shove it right up your things I have an irrational love for thread.
Re: First Single from #10: Mind Your Manners
Posted: Mon July 08, 2013 11:05 pm
by Sgt. Crackpot
elliseamos wrote:can somebody isolate (or tell me how to isolate) the two separate parts of the tour announcement video?
i'd like to play that ambient part on repeat as i lick batteries this evening.
thnx!

Damn you're sexy.
Re: First Single from #10: Mind Your Manners
Posted: Mon July 08, 2013 11:06 pm
by epilogue
elliseamos wrote:can somebody isolate (or tell me how to isolate) the two separate parts of the tour announcement video?
i'd like to play that ambient part on repeat as i lick batteries this evening.
thnx!

I'm sure sarge has an instructional gif he can lend you.
Re: First Single from #10: Mind Your Manners
Posted: Tue July 09, 2013 2:09 am
by Waverider
That second song clip sounds like it could be the brother/cousin of "ONCE".
Re: First Single from #10: Mind Your Manners
Posted: Tue July 09, 2013 2:45 am
by evenslow
Waverider wrote:That second song clip sounds like it could be the brother/cousin of "ONCE".
I was gonna say it could be the sister/nephew of "BROTHER."
Re: First Single from #10: Mind Your Manners
Posted: Tue July 09, 2013 2:48 am
by Norah
evenslow wrote:Sgt. Crackpot wrote:
The problem with these albums, more-so S/T than Backspacer, was the production and mastering. The end result was that they used compression mastering to emphasize the 'loudness' of the music, i.e.
everything is loud. This means a lot of 'clipping' occurs, cutting out some of the top and bottom end of the sound. Sadly they do this to a lot of music these days, and little part of me died inside when I realised PJ were doing it too.
To my ears I love dynamic mastering, where the music breathes, and there loudness and softness are both allowed. PJ's earlier albums used this method more, such as Riot Act and Ten specifically. The sound is fuller, roomier and has an inherent smooth quality to it.
To get technical here, if you look at the waveforms of the songs they would look like this:
Compressed:
Dynamic:

I've always wondered why the "viva la vinyl" guys went in for the compression thing. Has anyone heard the band talk about this? It would seem to me like something they'd be passionate about.
True story: Eddie Vedder doesn't know what compression is.
Re: First Single from #10: Mind Your Manners
Posted: Tue July 09, 2013 2:49 am
by Norah
Adobe Audition screenshots turn me on.
Re: First Single from #10: Mind Your Manners
Posted: Tue July 09, 2013 2:51 am
by Norah
But to be fair, all of PJs records are fairly compressed. Some are worse than others, but they've been on the wrong side of the loudness wars since the beginning. When they said viva la vinyl they were just being hipster douchebags who didn't know what the fuck they were talking about.
Re: First Single from #10: Mind Your Manners
Posted: Tue July 09, 2013 2:51 am
by Rangi Guy
cutuphalfdead wrote:Adobe Audition screenshots turn me on.
I've become numb to this place nothing turns me on around here like it used to.....

Re: First Single from #10: Mind Your Manners
Posted: Tue July 09, 2013 3:02 am
by Sgt. Crackpot
Rangi Guy wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:Adobe Audition screenshots turn me on.
I've become numb to this place nothing turns me on around here like it used to.....


Re: First Single from #10: Mind Your Manners
Posted: Tue July 09, 2013 3:05 am
by Strat
When a man tells me to wear my boner pants....I wear my boner pants