Page 46 of 47

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Fri January 06, 2017 4:07 am
by E.H. Ruddock
Where's that Mohawk pic of me, "the fuck you looking at" one?

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Fri January 06, 2017 8:41 pm
by epilogue
To be fair, I've never understood the term "emo." It seems like a generic insult that people throw when they can't think of a different insult, or they want to insult someone but they also don't want to be too harsh. It's a stupid fucking term that has never meant anything and continues to be meaningless.

Having made my thoughts clear on that word, I'll say now that I've never seen an "emo" pic of Ruddo.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Fri January 06, 2017 8:55 pm
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Fri January 06, 2017 8:57 pm
by LoathedVermin72
tragabigzanda wrote:Why's Joey so sensitivite about this? Seems sort of emo.
good post

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Fri January 06, 2017 8:58 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:Why's Joey so sensitivite about this? Seems sort of emo.
good post
was kind of a low hanging fruit though, so not really.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Fri January 06, 2017 8:59 pm
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Fri January 06, 2017 9:09 pm
by epilogue
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:Why's Joey so sensitivite about this? Seems sort of emo.
good post
was kind of a low hanging fruit though, so not really.
I'm so into everything E.H. Ruddock it's sickening.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Fri January 06, 2017 9:33 pm
by epilogue
MissYouAllDay wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:Why's Joey so sensitivite about this? Seems sort of emo.
Joey is sensitive about everything. Go back and look at how butt hurt he gets whenever someone insults this movie.
Hello, friend.

I'm not sure we've posted much together. I'm "Joey." How are you? I think you've got me all backwards, pal. While I do identify as a sensitive person, I wouldn't say that I'm sensitive about this movie at all. Butt hurt? That's another completely stupid expression. But I hope you'll find that I am not at all "butt hurt" by anyone insulting this movie. As I've said before in this thread, the movie itself, as a film, isn't great. It's fun and I found it entertaining and more importantly very important to the landscape of cinema. But I certainly don't care if others dislike or even hate the film. Opinions are opinions and nothing more. Whether or not any of you jabronies likes this movie is no skin off my sack, friend. People like different things, and thank god for that, amirite?

Anyway, I hope we can continue to post cordial manner as we move forward. I look forward to having fun posting with you and building a relationship as strong as the one I have with Ruddo and LV and trag and TVG (all posters who didn't like the film and have very strong opinions that differ from mine).

Be well.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Fri January 06, 2017 9:34 pm
by MissYouAllDay
Jesus, now he's making up posts to get butt hurt about.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Fri January 06, 2017 9:34 pm
by BurtReynolds
Butt hurt is one of my favorite terms.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Fri January 06, 2017 9:44 pm
by epilogue
BurtReynolds wrote:Butt hurt is one of my favorite terms.
It's completely stupid. But yeah it's fun.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Fri January 06, 2017 9:50 pm
by epilogue
MissYouAllDay wrote:Jesus, now he's making up posts to get butt hurt about.
I didn't even notice you deleted your post before I responded. Weird. Oh, well. Have a great day, friend.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Fri January 06, 2017 9:50 pm
by VinylGuy
durdencommatyler wrote:
MissYouAllDay wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:Why's Joey so sensitivite about this? Seems sort of emo.
Joey is sensitive about everything. Go back and look at how butt hurt he gets whenever someone insults this movie.
Hello, friend.

I'm not sure we've posted much together. I'm "Joey." How are you? I think you've got me all backwards, pal. While I do identify as a sensitive person, I wouldn't say that I'm sensitive about this movie at all. Butt hurt? That's another completely stupid expression. But I hope you'll find that I am not at all "butt hurt" by anyone insulting this movie. As I've said before in this thread, the movie itself, as a film, isn't great. It's fun and I found it entertaining and more importantly very important to the landscape of cinema. But I certainly don't care if others dislike or even hate the film. Opinions are opinions and nothing more. Whether or not any of you jabronies likes this movie is no skin off my sack, friend. People like different things, and thank god for that, amirite?

Anyway, I hope we can continue to post cordial manner as we move forward. I look forward to having fun posting with you and building a relationship as strong as the one I have with Ruddo and LV and trag and TVG (all posters who didn't like the film and have very strong opinions that differ from mine).

Be well.
:shake:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Fri January 06, 2017 9:52 pm
by BurtReynolds
If Paul Feig is never allowed to make another movie, I will consider this movie a smashing success.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Fri January 06, 2017 10:02 pm
by epilogue
BurtReynolds wrote:If Paul Feig is never allowed to make another movie, I will consider this movie a smashing success.
:lol:

Did you like any of the work he did on the US version of The Office?

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Sat January 07, 2017 3:27 am
by stip
Spy is so good

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Sat January 07, 2017 3:31 am
by E.H. Ruddock
stip wrote:Spy is so good
Statham is brilliant in that

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Sat January 07, 2017 3:42 am
by stip
so is McCarthy and Bobby Cannavale

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Sat January 07, 2017 3:53 am
by lennytheweedwhacker
meh

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Sat January 07, 2017 2:15 pm
by @SkitchP
durdencommatyler wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Butt hurt is one of my favorite terms.
It's completely stupid. But yeah it's fun.

the thing about butt hurt is it's a debate ender. Because no matter how someone responds you can keep going back to "BUTT HURT"