Red Mosquito

McParadigm wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:Just read some of the Twitter responses to Oprah's "Hope Lives" remark... what fucking planet are these people on? Should have taken my own advice but I figure if Oprah would say "we can be unified and make this work", progressives would listen.

The irony here is that only Trump can create the calm she's talking about. If you are a Dreamer, an environment voter, or a member of the LGBT community (among others), this is a president who has expressed an interest in doing things that could cause irreparable harm in terms of its impact on you. If he were to begin talking about his actual plans as president, and if they were deeply tempered in the way his rhetoric about Obama has become, then you'd see a lot of calming down.

If Hillary had won on a platform that vowed to take all guns away, and to place the name of anyone owning more than 5 on a public "dangerous peoples" list, I wouldn't expect or try to scold gun owners to play nice about it, either.

Yup. The amount of good that could be done with a 3 minute "stop the hate" speech would go a long way.

Birds in Hell wrote:

Simple Torture wrote:

Strat wrote:

Birds in Hell wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:Protests taking place in NYC and SF and some other places.

Bring out the water cannons.

Geezes spenno

This made me perk up, but I imagined spenno might not be aware of the historical baggage this carries in the US, re: the Civil Rights Movement. Benefit of the doubt!

Uh, woah, maybe something got lost in translation here...

Look, protesters are generally an irritant at the best of times, however it's difficult to have any degree of indulgence for a bunch of morons protesting against the clear winner of a fair, democratic vote. There are people in the world who I'm sure would gladly protest for the right to free elections, etc.

It will surprise no one to learn that I was one of the morons.

Being in the US for this election day was one of the strangest things I've ever experienced, especially coming right in the middle of a fun-filled vacation. The people around me were absolutely despondent, stricken with this all-consuming sense of loss. And I can sort of understand why; for many of them, 60 million people just told them "we don't care about your kind here". Of course that's not literally what happened, but it's how it feels to them while the wound is still fresh, and it's hard to discount that. The (perceived) legitimization of the uglier side of Trump's rhetoric and base is a hell of a gut punch. I still find it hard to process.

Taking to the streets in show of protest* is a right guaranteed by the US Constitution, and is sacrosanct in any truly free democracy. I know it's probably been years since you felt passionately about anything, but surely you can begin to understand why people-- especially marginalized folks who feel like their family or their rights are directly in jeopardy under this new administration-- would march out to air their grievances. Even if it doesn't accomplish anything on a practical sense beyond perhaps a measure of catharsis. Or sending a message to the president-elect that, should he follow through with the more outrageous policies he ran on, the people will not take it lying down.

*when done peacefully, as it was in my experience; I can't defend the violence in other demonstrations.

I knew the protests were full of non-citizens!

Not a week in and he's already backing off some of his angriest rhetoric. i can't imagine this will sit well with his most ardent supporters? Or maybe they really just dont care? Its all so confusing

House Speaker Paul Ryan said Sunday despite Donald Trump's campaign rhetoric, lawmakers are not prepared to form a deportation force to round-up and deport undocumented immigrants.

"We are not planning on erecting a deportation force. Donald Trump's not planning on that," Ryan told CNN's Jake Tapper on "State of the Union."

Along with keeping some items of Obamacare, not prosecuting hillary....

At least he's got his Twitter account back.

LoathedVermin72 wrote:FFS liberals, please stop this shit

That's not liberals, that's Lena Dunham. She's repulsive on her own.

tragabigzanda wrote:I'n having some sort of late-onset depression over this election. When it first happened, I was somehow able to gather enough information that I could understand the causes, where to allocate various feelings, etc. I was even happy and upbeat all day yesterday. But today... I'm just feeling pretty hopeless. All the liberal voices getting the headlines with their opinions -- Lena Dunham, Ethan Coen, etc -- are just killing me with their privileged opinions. And all my loved ones (family and friends) are back on Instagram sharing pictures of their food, going to watch movies, etc. It's like I'm watching the liberals react, and though I know there are some protests and calls to action beginning to take shape, there are way to many people wringing their hands or just tuning out.

Yup. Now take that and add in reading Stephen King's Bazaar of Bad Dreams and you have my state of mind. What a depressing book to read this week.

Feel whatever about his policies, but goddamn im going to miss this kind of human being int he white house

https://www.facebook.com/TelePolitics/v ... f=NEWSFEED

Amazing the difference we will have now.

That's a scary but accurate observation

He's actually being covered and playing the coverage like a reality tv star. Not a president elect. It's so depressing.

The between the lines on that one is it sounds like he is going to deport those that have broken the law as opposed to every undocumented immigrant, which could be half of the work force where i live.

I dont know. fuck.

Strat wrote:The between the lines on that one is it sounds like he is going to deport those that have broken the law as opposed to every undocumented immigrant, which could be half of the work force where i live.

I dont know. fuck.

I can't remember the title but there's a book out there somewhere that goes into what would happen to the United States if all illegal immigrant workers didnt turn up for work for just one day. The entire country would judder to a halt.

dimejinky99 wrote:

Strat wrote:The between the lines on that one is it sounds like he is going to deport those that have broken the law as opposed to every undocumented immigrant, which could be half of the work force where i live.

I dont know. fuck.

I can't remember the title but there's a book out there somewhere that goes into what would happen to the United States if all illegal immigrant workers didnt turn up for work for just one day. The entire country would judder to a halt.

Vail certainly would collapse. The rich folk would have to figure out how to flush their own toilets.

Meanwhile, Nigel Farrage is stateside courting Trump as a UK advisor. He isn't an MP or elected official. And doesn't speak for the UK in at official capacity.


Not unlikely Trump gives him a role. Doing god knows what.

Obama has been deporting the shit out of illegals during his presidency. People are acting like this is some horrible new development.

BurtReynolds wrote:Obama has been deporting the shit out of illegals during his presidency. People are acting like this is some horrible new development.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/obamas-d ... d=41715661

How many people have been deported under Obama?
President Barack Obama has often been referred to by immigration groups as the "Deporter in Chief."

Between 2009 and 2015 his administration has removed more than 2.5 million people through immigration orders, which doesn’t include the number of people who "self-deported" or were turned away and/or returned to their home country at the border by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

How does he compare to other presidents?
According to governmental data, the Obama administration has deported more people than any other president's administration in history.

In fact, they have deported more than the sum of all the presidents of the 20th century.

President George W. Bush's administration deported just over two million during his time in office; and Obama’s numbers don’t reflect his last year in office, for which data is not yet available.

QUICK - TO THE STREETS!

Of course but Trumps policies are far more aggressive than Obama's. I dont think most americans have a problem with controlling immigration but building a wall, punishing children of parents who are here illegally, and having muslims register are far more radical and facist in nature.

People are upset about that and the perceived (rightfully perceived ) threats of certain liberties that have been granted will now be swiped away by people like Trump and especially Mike Pence.

But sure, lets hose them down for being dumb or something.

It will be interesting to see if he actually does anything he said he would do, or if it was just populist pandering. Personally, I think Trump's wall is going to look like this in four years.

BurtReynolds wrote:It will be interesting to see if he actually does anything he said he would do, or if it was just populist pandering. Personally, I think Trump's wall is going to look like this in four years.

He just said something about how he knows this stuff because "construction". He said that in most areas a fence is reasonable but some absolutely a big wonderful wall.

Strat wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:It will be interesting to see if he actually does anything he said he would do, or if it was just populist pandering. Personally, I think Trump's wall is going to look like this in four years.

He just said something about how he knows this stuff because "construction". He said that in most areas a fence is reasonable but some absolutely a big wonderful wall.

The (few) parts that his constituents can easily see, I'm sure.