Red Mosquito

verb_to_trust wrote:It's going to be a sweep

Yeah, you're probably right.

Boston in 6
Cleveland in 5

Golden State in 4
Houston in 6

Boston in 7 (Wall will have 2 ridiculous games)
Cleveland in 5

Warriors in 4 (5 if Mike Brown Mike Browns)
Houston in 6

Celtics in 7
Cavs in 6

Warriors in 4
Spurs in 6

4/5 wrote:Celtics in 7
Cavs in 6

Warriors in 4
Spurs in 6

It's weird, I can see either team winning in 6, but I don't really see it going to a game 7.

The Spurs remind me a lot of a regular season team that racks up wins by doing things the right way and being well coached at this point. I don't see them as a real threat anymore until they refresh that roster a bit.

verb_to_trust wrote:The Spurs remind me a lot of a regular season team that racks up wins by doing things the right way and being well coached at this point. I don't see them as a real threat anymore until they refresh that roster a bit.

I agree. Just too many guys past their prime. Parker in particular looks super washed up and inconsistent.

Monkey_Driven wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:The Spurs remind me a lot of a regular season team that racks up wins by doing things the right way and being well coached at this point. I don't see them as a real threat anymore until they refresh that roster a bit.

I agree. Just too many guys past their prime. Parker in particular looks super washed up and inconsistent.

Even Aldridge looks washed

verb_to_trust wrote:

Monkey_Driven wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:The Spurs remind me a lot of a regular season team that racks up wins by doing things the right way and being well coached at this point. I don't see them as a real threat anymore until they refresh that roster a bit.

I agree. Just too many guys past their prime. Parker in particular looks super washed up and inconsistent.

Even Aldridge looks washed

Yeah, seems like his effort/assertiveness comes and goes. No wonder Lillard out-alpha'd him so quickly in Portland.

Monkey_Driven wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

Monkey_Driven wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:The Spurs remind me a lot of a regular season team that racks up wins by doing things the right way and being well coached at this point. I don't see them as a real threat anymore until they refresh that roster a bit.

I agree. Just too many guys past their prime. Parker in particular looks super washed up and inconsistent.

Even Aldridge looks washed

Yeah, seems like his effort/assertiveness comes and goes. No wonder Lillard out-alpha'd him so quickly in Portland.

I mid range shooting power forward is really not something that can be a game changer anymore anyway.

Rooting for the Rockets in round 3 is going to make me sick.

verb_to_trust wrote:

Monkey_Driven wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

Monkey_Driven wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:The Spurs remind me a lot of a regular season team that racks up wins by doing things the right way and being well coached at this point. I don't see them as a real threat anymore until they refresh that roster a bit.

I agree. Just too many guys past their prime. Parker in particular looks super washed up and inconsistent.

Even Aldridge looks washed

Yeah, seems like his effort/assertiveness comes and goes. No wonder Lillard out-alpha'd him so quickly in Portland.

I mid range shooting power forward is really not something that can be a game changer anymore anyway.

It can in some situations, but he's not fast enough anymore to switch on a lot of screens on D.

4/5 wrote:Rooting for the Rockets in round 3 is going to make me sick.

Pat Beverley doh

has anyone seen pitbull and jason kidd together at the same place?

Monkey_Driven wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:It's going to be a sweep

Yeah, you're probably right.

I'm hoping for a sweep. Hayward is less likely to leave for the C's if the Jazz show something against the Warriors. He's probably the only free agent Boston has a chance to can get and he's a long shot.

bada wrote:

Monkey_Driven wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:It's going to be a sweep

Yeah, you're probably right.

I'm hoping for a sweep. Hayward is less likely to leave for the C's if the Jazz show something against the Warriors. He's probably the only free agent Boston has a chance to can get and he's a long shot.

I like Hayward a lot. I bet he stays in Utah though.

Monkey_Driven wrote:

bada wrote:

Monkey_Driven wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:It's going to be a sweep

Yeah, you're probably right.

I'm hoping for a sweep. Hayward is less likely to leave for the C's if the Jazz show something against the Warriors. He's probably the only free agent Boston has a chance to can get and he's a long shot.

I like Hayward a lot. I bet he stays in Utah though.

Yeah they almost always stay.

bada wrote:

Monkey_Driven wrote:

bada wrote:

Monkey_Driven wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:It's going to be a sweep

Yeah, you're probably right.

I'm hoping for a sweep. Hayward is less likely to leave for the C's if the Jazz show something against the Warriors. He's probably the only free agent Boston has a chance to can get and he's a long shot.

I like Hayward a lot. I bet he stays in Utah though.

Yeah they almost always stay.

We don't know what he thinks though, I don't believe he's every expressed a desire to re-join Stevens, has he?

Would he want to be with Brad though? Brad has the look of a guy that has molested his players.

verb_to_trust wrote:Would he want to be with Brad though? Brad has the look of a guy that has molested his players.

You gonna go with the Molester for his nickname?