Red Mosquito

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:The NFL is do dumb

yeah that wasn't entertaining at all

You sound like hypebeast Michaels. Who apparently thinks a regular season opener between two teams who won't contend is one for the history books.

I'm 12-2 against the spread this week.

verb_to_trust wrote:This Willis Reed stuff is fucking stupid

No, that's Paul Pierce coming out of that wheelchair! haha

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:The NFL is do dumb

yeah that wasn't entertaining at all

You sound like hypebeast Michaels. Who apparently thinks a regular season opener between two teams who won't contend is one for the history books.

i thought the bears looked really promising!

And the trifecta of division rivals taking over the crowd is complete.

jeez

good thing there isn't like another way better LA team there now too for new fans to root for instead

assuming he's not out for a prolonged period of time, this rodgers injury could be beneficial. forcing him and mccarthy to go to a quick pass attack was clearly more effective in the second half against chicago's formidable pass rush. more of that this season would be great, and also a good way to keep an aging qb on the field. rodgers will still have his chance to make plays while moving, but that shouldn't be the default approach. one of the few knocks i've had with him for a few years now.

i see this more as a 'he went to the locker room injured, and they gave him a bunch of drugs, and then he came out drugged up and loaded with adrenaline' situation

so as long as they keep the drugs and adrenaline going, the packers have a lot to look forward to this year

Nobody ever talks about the Dolphins. Weird. Longest game in NFL history and Tannehill looked good. Gore looked good and he's 36. A lot of interesting story lines about the Dolphins but they never talk about them. It's confusing.

tree_ wrote:Nobody ever talks about the Dolphins

why should we? they are irrelevant

I was more referring to media. If you watched them play yesterday, you'd see why they are relevant.

A 6 win season isn’t relevant.

I remember when analysts would discuss the highlights of every game, every team. Now the highlights from NFL.com have no commentary track. I want me some Berman.

PHATJ wrote:A 6 win season isn’t relevant.

Last year was a fluke. It was a disaster year. We had Cutler ffs

tree_ wrote:I was more referring to media. If you watched them play yesterday, you'd see why they are relevant.

yes nothing quite as compelling as a seven-hour contest between five win teams

tree_ wrote:

PHATJ wrote:A 6 win season isn’t relevant.

Last year was a fluke. It was a disaster year. We had Cutler ffs

and you subtracted your three best players from that team

the dolphins are trash

Who cares this season is all about the Vikings. That D didnt even play up to their ability and still was the greatest thing on sunday.

Strat wrote:Who cares this season is all about the Vikings. That D didnt even play up to their ability and still was the greatest thing on sunday.

SKOL!

--- wrote:

tree_ wrote:

PHATJ wrote:A 6 win season isn’t relevant.

Last year was a fluke. It was a disaster year. We had Cutler ffs

and you subtracted your three best players from that team

Pouncy was irrelevant cause he was injured all the time. He couldn't even practice cause he was nursing his hip. Landry is very overrated. Most of his production was via play design. Amendola and/or Wilson will easily take his place in the slot and Wilson can stretch the field unlike Landry. Suh wasn't worth the salary and was a poor leader. Gase has the team he wants. This is a very underrated roster, you'll see.