Page 465 of 792
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu June 29, 2017 3:45 pm
by Norah
I don't watch baseball but I sure as shit have a strong opinion on it.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu June 29, 2017 4:04 pm
by numbers
Obviously Montero shouldnt have done/said that, buuuut, the Cubs do have some guys that are comically bad at holding runners on.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu June 29, 2017 4:05 pm
by Norah
Yeah, but Montero is just as bad at throwing guys out as Cubs pitchers are at holding guys on, so he has no credibility on the issue.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu June 29, 2017 4:11 pm
by Simple Torture
Mick I saw you get roastes by RedSoxStats on Twitter the other day; I love that account's info but he can be kind of a dick.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu June 29, 2017 4:14 pm
by verb_to_trust
cutuphalfdead wrote:I don't watch baseball but I sure as shit have a strong opinion on it.
This is America
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu June 29, 2017 4:20 pm
by Chris_H_2
Montero's been whining about others and how they're keeping him down for awhile. This was just the final straw. He'll, the idiot went on about Joe Maddon didn't play him enough ... at the Cubs World Series rally in Grant Park. Good riddance.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu June 29, 2017 4:26 pm
by verb_to_trust
Now all the Cubs need to do is play movie dress up for an upcoming road trip and they are BACK baby!
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu June 29, 2017 4:29 pm
by numbers
Simple Torture wrote:Mick I saw you get roastes by RedSoxStats on Twitter the other day; I love that account's info but he can be kind of a dick.
I didn't get roasted, he blocked me before I could respond, and my response was going to give me the W.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu June 29, 2017 4:32 pm
by Simple Torture
numbers wrote:Simple Torture wrote:Mick I saw you get roastes by RedSoxStats on Twitter the other day; I love that account's info but he can be kind of a dick.
I didn't get roasted, he blocked me before I could respond, and my response was going to give me the W.
What was your response? And I can't believe he blocked you, that's some petty shit.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu June 29, 2017 4:35 pm
by numbers
Well, after I accused him of cherry picking stats from the last month, he came back and said "well actually asshole I said all along that he was hitting good all year and was unlucky the first few months" and then he blocked me. I was going to respond by saying "so the stats only matter when they suit your narrative?"
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu June 29, 2017 4:42 pm
by numbers
I wouldn't have even cared but he called me ignorant which really pissed me off.
Re: MLB
Posted: Fri June 30, 2017 2:18 pm
by philpritchard
numbers wrote:Obviously Montero shouldnt have done/said that, buuuut, the Cubs do have some guys that are comically bad at holding runners on.
CS/SB by Montero with Arrieta/Lackey/Hendricks pitching - 0/23
CS/SB by Contreras with Arrieta/Lackey/Hendricks pitching - 4/7
Weird how holding runners isn't much of an issue for those pitchers when Contreras is catching.
Re: MLB
Posted: Sat July 01, 2017 12:35 am
by MadTIGERmaN
Since Machado's 2 homer game... which ive left him in my lineup for after being told you stick with Machado...
5-33, 1 Run, 2 RBI, 5 walks, 7 K's
Re: MLB
Posted: Sat July 01, 2017 1:50 am
by lennytheweedwhacker
i don't follow baseball much at all, but man do i love altuve
Re: MLB
Posted: Sat July 01, 2017 1:58 am
by PHATJ
Altuve is a GREAT player.
Re: MLB
Posted: Sat July 01, 2017 5:24 am
by Norah
he's pretty good
Re: MLB
Posted: Sat July 01, 2017 5:30 am
by PHATJ
cutuphalfdead wrote:he's pretty good
Ok, petey.

Re: MLB
Posted: Sat July 01, 2017 5:33 am
by Norah
PHATJ wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:he's pretty good
Ok, petey.

I was referring to the commercial he's in on MLB Network where he says "I'm pretty good..."

Re: MLB
Posted: Sat July 01, 2017 5:38 am
by PHATJ
cutuphalfdead wrote:PHATJ wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:he's pretty good
Ok, petey.

I was referring to the commercial he's in on MLB Network where he says "I'm pretty good..."


Well, now I get it.

Re: MLB
Posted: Sun July 02, 2017 4:48 am
by Bammer
Damn guys I nailed that Mitch Haniger for AL ROY a couple months ago. What do I win?