Page 48 of 714

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Tue February 04, 2014 4:53 am
by epilogue
I'm pretty sure one can't talk about range while bashing Bale and praising Ford.

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Tue February 04, 2014 5:50 am
by Rangi Guy
durdencommatyler wrote:I'm pretty sure one can't talk about range while bashing Bale and praising Ford.
:thumbsup:

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Tue February 04, 2014 11:09 pm
by numbers
@SkitchP wrote:Guys, its not like Zac Efron is a HUGE star that you should be concerned about like Ewen McGregor was. He's known, but he's hardly a superstar.
Don't hate on my boy Ewen.

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Wed February 05, 2014 8:34 pm
by @SkitchP
numbers wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:Guys, its not like Zac Efron is a HUGE star that you should be concerned about like Ewen McGregor was. He's known, but he's hardly a superstar.
Don't hate on my boy Ewen.

Im not!

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Thu February 06, 2014 4:27 pm
by Coach
Sgt. Crackpot wrote:I agree, dime. Most of the actors were very much unknown when the original Star Wars came out. I'd rather they did that again and find good, suitable, unknown actors again rather than focusing on getting any big name actors in some vague attempt to boost the movie. I mean, fuck, this is Star Wars - it doesn't need any big name actors to push it.

That's one of the things that annoyed me about the prequel trilogy, they got too many unsuited big name actors that didn't really have a passion for their characters, nor character development.

Surely they'd save a buttload on the actors wages, and can spend it on other areas.
But the unknown actors they got for the prequels kinda sucked, too.

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Thu February 06, 2014 4:53 pm
by McParadigm
Coach wrote:But the unknown actors they got for the prequels kinda sucked, too.
It mystifies me why anybody would ever blame the actors for the quality of their performances or the movies themselves, in a case like this. If it was just "Wow, Hayden Christenson sucked in that movie, he sure fucked things up," that might be a thing. But when Liam Neeson, Ewan McGregor, and Samuel L. Jackson ALL tank hard, it has to be the director. There's no way an entire ensemble cast sucks that much peter without there being an influencing source beyond their control.

Image

Unlike, say, Indiana Jones, where some of the side characters do alright (and Cate's problem is more her character's written cartoonishness than what she gives to it) and the only person blatantly sleepwalking through it all is Harrison Ford.

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Thu February 27, 2014 3:42 am
by Rangi Guy

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Thu February 27, 2014 2:53 pm
by Strat
Anyone have a guess on what the Villain will be in these films? Were any of Lucas' ideas taken for the books that followed Return of the Jedi?

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Thu February 27, 2014 3:00 pm
by McParadigm
I'd say he'll be a dude with a red lightsaber in a cloak and helmet who is really good at punching and has a giant black ship, or something.

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Thu February 27, 2014 3:11 pm
by Simple Torture
Strat wrote:Anyone have a guess on what the Villain will be in these films? Were any of Lucas' ideas taken for the books that followed Return of the Jedi?
As far as I remember, the novels needed a "stamp of approval" from Lucas for any major changes to the series' mythology (like the death of a major character), but the ideas came from the authors, not from Lucas. So unless Lucas wanted to take an idea from one of the authors, it'll be something completely new. So probably no Thrawn, unfortunately.

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Thu February 27, 2014 3:47 pm
by Kaius
I would have been excited with Fassbender.

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Thu February 27, 2014 4:58 pm
by epilogue
I love Adam Driver.

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Thu February 27, 2014 5:27 pm
by McParadigm
Yeah, the rush to reference Vader is way more indicative of danger than the casting itself

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Thu February 27, 2014 5:32 pm
by epilogue
I don't disagree, Mr. McParadigm.

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Thu February 27, 2014 5:41 pm
by Kaius
I'm not familiar with Adam Driver

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Thu February 27, 2014 5:58 pm
by Alex
Kaius wrote:I'm not familiar with Adam Driver
he's a shorter and uglier gheorghe mureșan

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Thu February 27, 2014 5:59 pm
by Coach
McParadigm wrote:
Coach wrote:But the unknown actors they got for the prequels kinda sucked, too.
It mystifies me why anybody would ever blame the actors for the quality of their performances or the movies themselves, in a case like this. If it was just "Wow, Hayden Christenson sucked in that movie, he sure fucked things up," that might be a thing. But when Liam Neeson, Ewan McGregor, and Samuel L. Jackson ALL tank hard, it has to be the director. There's no way an entire ensemble cast sucks that much peter without there being an influencing source beyond their control.

Image

Unlike, say, Indiana Jones, where some of the side characters do alright (and Cate's problem is more her character's written cartoonishness than what she gives to it) and the only person blatantly sleepwalking through it all is Harrison Ford.
Plenty of blame to go around.

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Thu February 27, 2014 6:09 pm
by nyquillyn
Driver's involvement is the first piece of good news to come out of this shitstorm.

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Thu February 27, 2014 6:11 pm
by Alex
turned2black wrote:Driver's involvement is the first piece of good news to come out of this shitstorm.
what's his weekly mileage, you think?

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Thu February 27, 2014 6:24 pm
by nyquillyn
Alex wrote:
turned2black wrote:Driver's involvement is the first piece of good news to come out of this shitstorm.
what's his weekly mileage, you think?
Sub 50. He's a busy guy. I'm guessing he goes with one of those low-mileage Hanson plans.