Red Mosquito

more liberal media lies.

go out on your own terms, lady!
http://www.newser.com/story/196861/29-y ... -life.html

Morrissey is being treated for cancer.

dimejinky99 wrote:Morrissey is being treated for cancer.

"If I die, I die."

Jesus. Morrissey is his own Drago.

Does Morrissey have cancer or does cancer have Morrissey?

one is scarier than the other.

not news:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic ... laims.html

What's the orgasmest part of your body?
Some say your toes.
Some say your nose.

I think it's your mind.

I need to have a talk with my wife.

Well, my self esteem just shot up a few points.

A US F15 went down in England today
http://www.theliberal.ie/us-air-force-j ... n-england/

http://m.bbc.com/news/uk-england-lincolnshire-29544064

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2014/10/ ... latestnews

'Gender inclusive' school district says drop 'boys and girls,' call kids 'purple penguins'

The fine folks who run the school system in Lincoln, Neb., are on a campaign to make their classrooms gender-inclusive. And that means teachers will no longer refer to boys and girls … as boys and girls.

“Don’t use phrases such as ‘boys and girls,’ ‘you guys,’ ‘ladies and gentlemen,’ and similarly gendered expressions to get kids’ attention,” reads a handout from the Lincoln Public Schools that was given to teachers.

The handout was part of an effort to educate teachers and administrators about transgender issues, educators told the Lincoln Journal Star.

So instead of asking boys and girls to line up as boys or girls, teachers have been encouraged to segregate the children by whether they prefer skateboards or bikes, or whether they like milk or juice.
“The agenda we’re promoting is to help all kids succeed,” Brenda Leggiardo the district's coordinator of social workers and counselors told the newspaper. “We have kids who come to us with a whole variety of circumstances, and we need to equitably serve all kids.”

So instead of asking boys and girls to line up as boys or girls, teachers have been encouraged to segregate the children by whether they prefer skateboards or bikes, or whether they like milk or juice.

“Always ask yourself, ‘Will this configuration create a gendered space?’” the handout stated.

The handout, provided by Gender Spectrum, a website which "provides education, training and support to help create a gender sensitive and inclusive environment for children of all ages" does not explain what to do if all of the children like juice or skateboards. But it does suggest teachers “create classroom names and then ask all of the ‘purple penguins’ to meet at the rug.”

Purple penguins?

The Nebraska Watchdog website published copies of the handouts, titled, “12 easy steps on the way to gender inclusiveness…”

The documents are chock-full of all sorts of advice for teachers as they deconstruct and reconstruct the notion of what constitutes a boy and what constitutes a girl. (To avoid offense, those terms will henceforth be known as the “b-word” and the “g-word.”)

CLICK HERE TO JOIN TODD ON FACEBOOK FOR CULTURE WAR NEWS!

“Provide an opportunity for every student to identify a preferred name or pronoun,” the document reads. “At the beginning of the year or at Back-to-School Night, invite students and parents to let you know if they have a preferred name and/or pronoun by which they wish to be referred.”

Back when I was in school, teachers only asked kids if they’d like to be referred to by their first name or their middle name. Of course, I went to school during the Dark Ages.

The document also provides teachers with information to prevent kids from getting bullied on the playground. They suggest teaching kids to use phrases like, “Please respect my privacy” and “Hey, they’re called ‘private parts’ for a reason.”

Yes sir, that kind of tough talk should definitely dissuade the playground bullies.

Teachers were also encouraged to share anecdotes from their own lives “that reflect gender inclusiveness.”

“Even better, share examples when you were not gender inclusive in your thinking, words or behaviors, what you learned as a result and what you will do differently next time,” the handout states.

I wonder if teachers are allowed to opt out of that part of the assignment. Perhaps they could tell the kids, “They’re called private parts for a reason.”

Back when I was in school, the only thing the teacher did was read nursery rhymes – like “Rub-a-Dub-Dub.” It was the Dark Ages, folks.

It was an incredibly insensitive time in our nation’s history, when girls were girls and men were men (with respect to Archie Bunker).

To illustrate its point, the district provided an illustration of a gingerbread man. There I go again. How insensitive of me. It’s a gingerbread person. But for the sake of the teachers, the illustration was called a “genderbread person.” Clever, right?

The “genderbread person” was created by social justice comedian Sam Killermann. Who knew there was such a thing? But word on the street is the social justice people have quite the funny bone.

“Gender is one of those things everyone thinks they understand, but most people don’t,” Killermann wrote. “Like ‘Inception,’ gender isn’t binary. It’s not either or. In many cases it’s both/and.A bit of this, a dash of that. This tasty little guide is meant to be an appetizer for gender understanding. It’s okay if you’re hungry for more. In fact, that’s the idea.”

So what are the b-words and g-words supposed to call Superman and Wonder Woman? Super Being and Wonder Entity?

And I suspect some schools will have to rename their athletic teams – like the Smith County Cowpersons.

As you might imagine, some parents are not all that happy with the gender inclusiveness agenda. Rachel Terry fired off an email to other moms and dads accusing the district of social re-engineering.

The Journal Star obtained a copy of her email. She said the district was using taxpayer dollars to promote “the deconstruction of fundamental family and religious values.”

In her defense, Mrs. Terry probably grew up in the Dark Ages, too – when little g-words wore dresses and little b-words wore Husky jeans.

One school district official rejected her argument and said it was not pushing a political or religious agenda. Nor was it pushing a sexual preference on people.

“Part of education in addition to academics is the feeling of welcomeness, the relationship piece,” district official Russ Uhing told the newspaper.

In its quest for “welcomeness,” perhaps the district could ban all homework and allow children to eat cupcakes in the lunchroom. I’m sure the b-words and g-words would feel mighty welcome with those changes.

Still, the folks at Gender Spectrum admit there will be times when teachers will have to use a gender-specific term.

“When you find it necessary to reference gender, say ‘Boy, girl, both or neither,’” the handout states. “When asked why, use this as a teachable moment. Emphasize to students that your classroom recognizes and celebrates the gender diversity of all students.”

And that, dear readers, is a glimpse into what they’re teaching kids in public schools these days.

While we’re on the subject, what’s a gender-neutral term for morons?

Couple Sentenced For Having Sex In Police Car

http://news.sky.com/story/1350250/coupl ... police-car

Fuck You Jobu wrote: The “genderbread person” was created by social justice comedian Sam Killermann.

This could be a case of epic trolling.

lol @ foxnews

McParadigm wrote:lol @ foxnews

Go on..... wait. No. Yup.

broken iris wrote:

McParadigm wrote:lol @ foxnews

Go on..... wait. No. Yup.

Yeah I agree.

Not just fox http://watchdog.org/174768/gender-inclusive/

You're missing the point.

School districts get sued all the time, for all manner of reasons. Teacher training days are one of the ways legal departments protect the district against liability. Teacher training bats about 50%, as to whether a training day will be used for "real" training or whether it will be about the district documenting a lawsuit-protection training event.

Whenever they identify a new type of lawsuit that seems to be occuring of late (by the way: http://www.cnn.com/2013/02/27/us/colora ... rl-school/), they add a new training topic to the rotation. That way, if parents sue said district, the district can establish that while, gee, they don't have any specific rules drawn up on the subject, they DO have teacher training on this issue. See? We're trying, it wasn't a district institutional problem but rather an "incident," lawsuit vamoose.

What this story DOES say: training was provided.
What this story DOESN'T say, but wants you to assume: teachers are required to not use gender classifications.
What this story DOES say: examples of other ways to address a class were presented by an outside organization, so hired because the district didn't care enough about the results to develop the training itself.
What this story DOESN'T say, but wants you to assume: teachers are required to use these terms in the future.

More than half of the increase in education spending in the last 30 years (inflation aside) has occured in response to lawsuits and legal pressures. This is exactly what the world looks like when your organization is controlled by legal paranoia and is forever under the scrutiny of morons.

Fuck You Jobu wrote:

broken iris wrote:

McParadigm wrote:lol @ foxnews

Go on..... wait. No. Yup.

Yeah I agree.

Not just fox http://watchdog.org/174768/gender-inclusive/

I am all for busting the binary gender stereotype, but I also think there is a big risk of doing more harm than good if it's done too early.

Though this probably deserves it's own thread.

What Is Dogspotting and Why Are People So Angry About It?

http://mashable.com/2014/10/09/dogspott ... -main-link