Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

May the force be with you
Post Reply

So what did you think (DcT edition)?

Best of all the films
8
9%
Better than A New Hope, Empire, the prequels, But not Jedi
2
2%
Better than A New Hope, Jedi, the prequels, but not Empire
6
7%
Better than Empire, Jedi, the Prequels, but not A New Hope
2
2%
Better than A New Hope and the prequels, but not Empire or Jedi
2
2%
Better than Empire and the prequels, but not A New Hope or Jedi
1
1%
Better than Jedi and the prequels, but not a New Hope or Empire
23
26%
As good as Empire, Jedi, and A New Hope, and better than the prequels
15
17%
Better than the prequels, but not the originals
15
17%
As good as some of the prequels
7
8%
As good as all of the prequels
2
2%
Worse than the prequels
5
6%
 
Total votes: 88

User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

dimejinky99 wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:they're clearly not just aimed at kids (witness this thread). They are aimed at a innocent and a sense of unencumbered wonder, which is something we associate with childhood only because life hasn't beaten it out of you at that point. But there's something powerful about that feeling, which is why adults look for ways to recapture it.
Except this movie doesn't have that at all.
I think that most of the world's reaction to this film probably begs to differ.
Great argument
I think it is a better argument than the narcissistic assumption that because I failed to experience something therefore the experience must not exist.
A genuine "sense of wonder" is always going to be totally subjective, even if we start getting into specific aesthetic choices, such as camera angles and whatnot. But I really don't see where there that sensibility comes through in the material, disregarding visceral reactions.


Sad you didn't get that sense of wonder from this LV.

What was the last film gave you that same sense?
Lots of movies do. If we're talking recent movies, well, Godzilla comes to mind immediately. And I'm sure Rogue One will too.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by stip »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:they're clearly not just aimed at kids (witness this thread). They are aimed at a innocent and a sense of unencumbered wonder, which is something we associate with childhood only because life hasn't beaten it out of you at that point. But there's something powerful about that feeling, which is why adults look for ways to recapture it.
Except this movie doesn't have that at all.
I think that most of the world's reaction to this film probably begs to differ.
Great argument
I think it is a better argument than the narcissistic assumption that because I failed to experience something therefore the experience must not exist.
A genuine "sense of wonder" is always going to be totally subjective, even if we start getting into specific aesthetic choices, such as camera angles and whatnot. But I really don't see where there that sensibility comes through in the material, disregarding visceral reactions.
If it is totally subjective then how can you disregard the visceral experience. That becomes the measure. As far as how it comes through in the material, there is 50 pages in this forum and thousands on the internet where people are laying out precisely when and where and how and why they were affected, to which your response again is 'I don't see it, so it doesn't exist.'
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by dimejinky99 »

Things we have to look forward to.
EP 8 might take place a few years after 7.
Rey gets all trained up by Luke?
Luke and leia meeting again. Sister and brother.
The resistance returning to the republic and the full might of the republic rooting out Snoke and his forces.
Showdown with Kylo and Luke? Or Luke and Snoke (they'll save these for the final film)
Kylo meeting leia again. This almost had to happen in some form.
Luke destroys Snoke therefore clearing kylos mind of deception ?
Back to the light?

Poe Rey Finn Chewie new Falcon crew on some adventure to blow up or find something


Force ghosts. Obi wan? Yoda? Anakin?
Last edited by dimejinky99 on Sun December 20, 2015 5:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

stip wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:they're clearly not just aimed at kids (witness this thread). They are aimed at a innocent and a sense of unencumbered wonder, which is something we associate with childhood only because life hasn't beaten it out of you at that point. But there's something powerful about that feeling, which is why adults look for ways to recapture it.
Except this movie doesn't have that at all.
I think that most of the world's reaction to this film probably begs to differ.
Great argument
I think it is a better argument than the narcissistic assumption that because I failed to experience something therefore the experience must not exist.
A genuine "sense of wonder" is always going to be totally subjective, even if we start getting into specific aesthetic choices, such as camera angles and whatnot. But I really don't see where there that sensibility comes through in the material, disregarding visceral reactions.
If it is totally subjective then how can you disregard the visceral experience. That becomes the measure. As far as how it comes through in the material, there is 50 pages in this forum and thousands on the internet where people are laying out precisely when and where and how and why they were affected, to which your response again is 'I don't see it, so it doesn't exist.'
Thousands of clueless fanboys jizzing themselves over "NEW SW THAT'S NOSTALGIC AND NOT LIKE THE PREQUELS OMG I'M CRYING" hardly qualifies as compelling evidence of what the movie is doing. In the end, if we're dealing in subjective, emotional responses, your visceral reaction is no more valid than my lack of one, even if a lot of people agree with you. We would need to break this down to the ideology of the film itself, and just saying shit like "Oh man thing X was great" or "the new characters really worked" isn't enough.
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12537
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by bada »

I don't want Kylo redeemed. That little shit.
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by dimejinky99 »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:they're clearly not just aimed at kids (witness this thread). They are aimed at a innocent and a sense of unencumbered wonder, which is something we associate with childhood only because life hasn't beaten it out of you at that point. But there's something powerful about that feeling, which is why adults look for ways to recapture it.
Except this movie doesn't have that at all.
I think that most of the world's reaction to this film probably begs to differ.
Great argument
I think it is a better argument than the narcissistic assumption that because I failed to experience something therefore the experience must not exist.
A genuine "sense of wonder" is always going to be totally subjective, even if we start getting into specific aesthetic choices, such as camera angles and whatnot. But I really don't see where there that sensibility comes through in the material, disregarding visceral reactions.
If it is totally subjective then how can you disregard the visceral experience. That becomes the measure. As far as how it comes through in the material, there is 50 pages in this forum and thousands on the internet where people are laying out precisely when and where and how and why they were affected, to which your response again is 'I don't see it, so it doesn't exist.'
Thousands of clueless fanboys jizzing themselves over "NEW SW THAT'S NOSTALGIC AND NOT LIKE THE PREQUELS OMG I'M CRYING" hardly qualifies as compelling evidence of what the movie is doing. In the end, if we're dealing in subjective, emotional responses, your visceral reaction is no more valid than my lack of one, even if a lot of people agree with you. We would need to break this down to the ideology of the film itself, and just saying shit like "Oh man thing X was great" or "the new characters really worked" isn't enough.


Bad news for you LV


Rogue one is going to depend a lot more on established tropes and plot devices than any of these new trilogies.

Joe public is going to have to be spoon fed that it's Star Wars for them to know it's a Star Wars film
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

dimejinky99 wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:they're clearly not just aimed at kids (witness this thread). They are aimed at a innocent and a sense of unencumbered wonder, which is something we associate with childhood only because life hasn't beaten it out of you at that point. But there's something powerful about that feeling, which is why adults look for ways to recapture it.
Except this movie doesn't have that at all.
I think that most of the world's reaction to this film probably begs to differ.
Great argument
I think it is a better argument than the narcissistic assumption that because I failed to experience something therefore the experience must not exist.
A genuine "sense of wonder" is always going to be totally subjective, even if we start getting into specific aesthetic choices, such as camera angles and whatnot. But I really don't see where there that sensibility comes through in the material, disregarding visceral reactions.
If it is totally subjective then how can you disregard the visceral experience. That becomes the measure. As far as how it comes through in the material, there is 50 pages in this forum and thousands on the internet where people are laying out precisely when and where and how and why they were affected, to which your response again is 'I don't see it, so it doesn't exist.'
Thousands of clueless fanboys jizzing themselves over "NEW SW THAT'S NOSTALGIC AND NOT LIKE THE PREQUELS OMG I'M CRYING" hardly qualifies as compelling evidence of what the movie is doing. In the end, if we're dealing in subjective, emotional responses, your visceral reaction is no more valid than my lack of one, even if a lot of people agree with you. We would need to break this down to the ideology of the film itself, and just saying shit like "Oh man thing X was great" or "the new characters really worked" isn't enough.


Bad news for you LV


Rogue one is going to depend a lot more on established tropes and plot devices than any of these new trilogies.

Joe public is going to have to be spoon fed that it's Star Wars for them to know it's a Star Wars film
lol
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8626
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by Mecca »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:Come to think of it, the contrast between Luke's reaction to his vision in EST and Rey's reaction to her vision in TFA is a pretty perfect Gen X vs. Millennials moment. In EST, Luke has a scary, challenging vision and resultantly reflects on some hard truths - tries to sort out what it meant. Rey has a scary, challenging vision and resultantly cries, throws a fit, and runs out into the woods to pout.
:haha:
User avatar
ABNorman
The Beef
Posts: 4475
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 10:16 pm

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by ABNorman »

Simple Torture wrote:
Guesses for Opening Weekend US Domestic Gross:

strat - $2.5 b
ruddo - $325 m
CopperTom - $350 m
Kaius - $278 m
spike - $251 m
zeb - $250 m
Simple Torture - $245 m
lenny - $236 m
Argo - $230 m
stip - $211 m
Burt - $1 m
Update on this: it's estimated that TFA grossed $120 million domestically on Thursday/Friday, which breaks two records: largest Thursday-preview opening ever ($57 m) and largest one-day total ever ($120 m--keep in mind that for record keeping purposes, "one day" includes Thursday and Friday). Also keep in mind that these are estimates, and that these totals usually go up. Target to break the largest opening weekend ever is $208.8 m (Jurassic World). If I got another guess, I'd probably put it in Kaius' guess territory.
Lenny takes it: $238 million.

http://variety.com/2015/film/box-office ... 201665753/
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8626
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by Mecca »

stip wrote:It's like people complaining about Rey starting out on a desert. Yes, that's where Luke and anakin began but:

1. There are literally only 5 types of planets we ever see in star wars, and each one is an environmental theme (and see skitch's early point about filming on location and how that limits you)

2. The orphan starting alone is a standard hero's journey archtype. It wasn't original in Star Wars. It wasn't original in Harry Potter. But it doesn't need to be original. It helps us resonate with the character precisely because it isn't.

3. The fact that she's stuck on such a shit hole (worse than Tattoine) make her desire to go back and her longing for her family more poigniant. If she wanted to return to Maz's lush paradise planet who could blame her.

4. Luke grew up with a family. She grew up alone.

5. Tatooine had a civilization--poor and rural, but it was there. Luke grew up on a sandy frontier. Rey grew up in a wasteland and they did invest it with a different feel. If you get hung up on the presence of sand you're not looking beyond a pretty superficial level,.

6. Since Rey was abandoned (she was put there deliberately) some far out of the way place where no one would ever think to look (unlike the ridiculous decision to leave Luke with his actualy fucking uncle) makes sense.
Owen Lars wasn't Luke's uncle by blood. His father married Shmi Skywalker, so Anakin was his stepbrother in name only
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by dimejinky99 »

It's at 571 million globally

Damned yanks thinking there's no world outside their borders haha
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35978
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by spike »

stip wrote:they're clearly not just aimed at kids (witness this thread). They are aimed at a innocent and a sense of unencumbered wonder, which is something we associate with childhood only because life hasn't beaten it out of you at that point. But there's something powerful about that feeling, which is why adults look for ways to recapture it.
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by dimejinky99 »

They're all being paid insanely well apart from Rey and Finn
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-enter ... 80391.html
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by stip »

spike wrote:
stip wrote:they're clearly not just aimed at kids (witness this thread). They are aimed at a innocent and a sense of unencumbered wonder, which is something we associate with childhood only because life hasn't beaten it out of you at that point. But there's something powerful about that feeling, which is why adults look for ways to recapture it.
They are also aimed at the adult action figure market, yes.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

dimejinky99 wrote:They're all being paid insanely well apart from Rey and Finn
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-enter ... 80391.html
Well duh
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by dimejinky99 »

Finns number is FN2187

The cell Leia is held in A new hope?

2187
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35978
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by spike »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
stip wrote:they're clearly not just aimed at kids (witness this thread). They are aimed at a innocent and a sense of unencumbered wonder, which is something we associate with childhood only because life hasn't beaten it out of you at that point. But there's something powerful about that feeling, which is why adults look for ways to recapture it.
Except this movie doesn't have that at all.
I think that most of the world's reaction to this film probably begs to differ.
Great argument
I think it is a better argument than the narcissistic assumption that because I failed to experience something therefore the experience must not exist.
A genuine "sense of wonder" is always going to be totally subjective, even if we start getting into specific aesthetic choices, such as camera angles and whatnot. But I really don't see where there that sensibility comes through in the material, disregarding visceral reactions.
LV, you remind me of one of my good friends who studied film in college. he's often so preoccupied with proper crane shots, etc. that he can't enjoy a movie like a normal person anymore. it happens, it's understandable, but just be aware of it.
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12537
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by bada »

spike wrote:
stip wrote:they're clearly not just aimed at kids (witness this thread). They are aimed at a innocent and a sense of unencumbered wonder, which is something we associate with childhood only because life hasn't beaten it out of you at that point. But there's something powerful about that feeling, which is why adults look for ways to recapture it.

My kids don't play right either.
Last edited by bada on Sun December 20, 2015 6:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35978
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by spike »

dimejinky99 wrote:Finns number is FN2187

The cell Leia is held in A new hope?

2187
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21-87
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15608
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by Chris_H_2 »

dimejinky99 wrote:Damned yanks thinking there's no world outside their borders haha
This was random
Post Reply