Re: MLB
Posted: Fri September 01, 2017 4:19 am
Wait, maybe it happened?
Hard to complain about the extension now that they managed to trade him for actual, good prospects. That's a great return for the Tigers.Chris_H_2 wrote:This could've all been avoided had the Tigers not jumped the gun and extended his contract 2 years before they had to. People said they couldn't let the face of the franchise walk. Now they want to trade him. So infuriating.
Yeah I feel like this is a pretty good deal for both sides.philpritchard wrote:Hard to complain about the extension now that they managed to trade him for actual, good prospects. That's a great return for the Tigers.Chris_H_2 wrote:This could've all been avoided had the Tigers not jumped the gun and extended his contract 2 years before they had to. People said they couldn't let the face of the franchise walk. Now they want to trade him. So infuriating.
agreed. i posted that out of frustration when people were reporting that verlander nixed the deal.cutuphalfdead wrote:Yeah I feel like this is a pretty good deal for both sides.philpritchard wrote:Hard to complain about the extension now that they managed to trade him for actual, good prospects. That's a great return for the Tigers.Chris_H_2 wrote:This could've all been avoided had the Tigers not jumped the gun and extended his contract 2 years before they had to. People said they couldn't let the face of the franchise walk. Now they want to trade him. So infuriating.

I have done a complete 180 on this over the last couple years and now think the AL should get rid of the DH.MadTIGERmaN wrote:I'm still in favor of the National League style of ball (NO DH!) even though it just cost the Brewers their #1 pitcher for the rest of the season...
Does this have anything to do with Ortiz retiring?numbers wrote:I have done a complete 180 on this over the last couple years and now think the AL should get rid of the DH.MadTIGERmaN wrote:I'm still in favor of the National League style of ball (NO DH!) even though it just cost the Brewers their #1 pitcher for the rest of the season...
No, pace of play, but the idea that Ortiz never exists without a DH gives me pause.cutuphalfdead wrote:Does this have anything to do with Ortiz retiring?numbers wrote:I have done a complete 180 on this over the last couple years and now think the AL should get rid of the DH.MadTIGERmaN wrote:I'm still in favor of the National League style of ball (NO DH!) even though it just cost the Brewers their #1 pitcher for the rest of the season...
just can't wait to see a dead out in the lineup every 2nd or 3rd inning or the masterful workings of the double switch that even the most inept managers (see, dusty baker) can seem to somehow maneuver?numbers wrote:I have done a complete 180 on this over the last couple years and now think the AL should get rid of the DH.MadTIGERmaN wrote:I'm still in favor of the National League style of ball (NO DH!) even though it just cost the Brewers their #1 pitcher for the rest of the season...
You haven't watched John Farrell manage under NL rules.Chris_H_2 wrote:just can't wait to see a dead out in the lineup every 2nd or 3rd inning or the masterful workings of the double switch that even the most inept managers (see, dusty baker) can seem to somehow maneuver?numbers wrote:I have done a complete 180 on this over the last couple years and now think the AL should get rid of the DH.MadTIGERmaN wrote:I'm still in favor of the National League style of ball (NO DH!) even though it just cost the Brewers their #1 pitcher for the rest of the season...