Re: What movies are you watching?
Posted: Thu February 04, 2016 3:58 pm
I never did care much for Gladiator. I would certainly call it Scott's most overrated film.
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Rewatching Carrie. My god, De Palma is freakin' incredible. Every shot is so carefully composed, every cut so precisely orchestrated. This is the kind of craftsmanship contemporary filmmakers don't seem to grasp.
You're so very welcome, Ruddster.E.H. Ruddock wrote:thanks for bottom-paging me, joey
OR... maybe The Martian isn't visually incompetent.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I don't understand how someone who can make movies as visually overwhelming as Legend, Blade Runner, or even Prometheus can then make a movie as visually incompetent as The Martian. Scott is a baffling director.
No, it really is. It's over-edited. Shot selection is lazy and haphazard. Cinematography is flat. It's so bizarre, because Prometheus is just the opposite.durdencommatyler wrote:OR... maybe The Martian isn't visually incompetent.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I don't understand how someone who can make movies as visually overwhelming as Legend, Blade Runner, or even Prometheus can then make a movie as visually incompetent as The Martian. Scott is a baffling director.
and Elba and Rapacelennytheweedwhacker wrote:that and fassbender were about the only things prometheus had going for it
watdurdencommatyler wrote:I never did care much for Gladiator. I would certainly call it Scott's most overrated film.
oh yeah i forgot about elba...i found rapace mostly forgettable in this role...more to do with the character than her performance thoughLoathedVermin72 wrote:and Elba and Rapacelennytheweedwhacker wrote:that and fassbender were about the only things prometheus had going for it
I'll agree some of the editing and shot choices are strange. I don't think the cinematography is flat, I really don't understand that criticism. Yet it continues to come up, so it really must just be me. But, yeah, there are some odd choices, for sure. I'm not confident using the word lazy, but I won't argue with haphazard.LoathedVermin72 wrote:No, it really is. It's over-edited. Shot selection is lazy and haphazard. Cinematography is flat. It's so bizarre, because Prometheus is just the opposite.durdencommatyler wrote:OR... maybe The Martian isn't visually incompetent.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I don't understand how someone who can make movies as visually overwhelming as Legend, Blade Runner, or even Prometheus can then make a movie as visually incompetent as The Martian. Scott is a baffling director.
I said I NEVER DID CARE MUCH FOR GLADIATOR. I WOULD CERTAINLY CALL IT SCOTT'S MOST OVERRATED FILM.Kaius wrote:watdurdencommatyler wrote:I never did care much for Gladiator. I would certainly call it Scott's most overrated film.
Huh. No, I have not seen that. But maybe I should.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Have you guys seen the extended cut of Gladiator? It's like a completely different movie. It becomes a political thriller instead of an action-driven revenge movie.
interesting...i need to find thatLoathedVermin72 wrote:Have you guys seen the extended cut of Gladiator? It's like a completely different movie. It becomes a political thriller instead of an action-driven revenge movie.
MAYBE YOU SHOULDdurdencommatyler wrote:Huh. No, I have not seen that. But maybe I should.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Have you guys seen the extended cut of Gladiator? It's like a completely different movie. It becomes a political thriller instead of an action-driven revenge movie.
YOU THINK I SHOULDE.H. Ruddock wrote:MAYBE YOU SHOULDdurdencommatyler wrote:Huh. No, I have not seen that. But maybe I should.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Have you guys seen the extended cut of Gladiator? It's like a completely different movie. It becomes a political thriller instead of an action-driven revenge movie.