Red Mosquito

Fuck You Jobu wrote:Liked this version

Great catch, bs interference call, though.

Iholdthepain wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:F*ck Boston

Phuck Philly!

Yeah them too

Iholdthepain wrote:

Fuck You Jobu wrote:Liked this version

Great catch, bs interference call, though.

I can see why it was called. There was contact and the defender was completely out of control. Since he wasn't in control of his body, he couldn't make a play on the ball. No play on the ball + contact = interference.

btw just saw this pop up

Fuck You Jobu wrote:

Iholdthepain wrote:

Fuck You Jobu wrote:Liked this version

Great catch, bs interference call, though.

I can see why it was called. There was contact and the defender was completely out of control. Since he wasn't in control of his body, he couldn't make a play on the ball. No play on the ball + contact = interference.

according to the rule, if the defender is looking back and trying to make a play on the ball, he has as much right to get into position as the receiver... but whatevs. It's the most difficult call to make in football, and Cowboys won anyway.

Iholdthepain wrote:

Fuck You Jobu wrote:

Iholdthepain wrote:

Fuck You Jobu wrote:Liked this version

Great catch, bs interference call, though.

I can see why it was called. There was contact and the defender was completely out of control. Since he wasn't in control of his body, he couldn't make a play on the ball. No play on the ball + contact = interference.

according to the rule, if the defender is looking back and trying to make a play on the ball, he has as much right to get into position as the receiver... but whatevs. It's the most difficult call to make in football, and Cowboys won anyway.

Since he was falling and never really that close to the ball - much less making a play on it, my guess would be that is why it was called.

Fuck You Jobu wrote:

Iholdthepain wrote:

Fuck You Jobu wrote:

Iholdthepain wrote:

Fuck You Jobu wrote:Liked this version

Great catch, bs interference call, though.

I can see why it was called. There was contact and the defender was completely out of control. Since he wasn't in control of his body, he couldn't make a play on the ball. No play on the ball + contact = interference.

according to the rule, if the defender is looking back and trying to make a play on the ball, he has as much right to get into position as the receiver... but whatevs. It's the most difficult call to make in football, and Cowboys won anyway.

Since he was falling and never really that close to the ball - much less making a play on it, my guess would be that is why it was called.

True, but did he even touch the receiver, much less interfere? Looks iffy to me.

It was actually a pretty accurate adjustment read on the ball if you look at where the ball was coming down... That Cowboys defender was in good position to catch the ball had the receiver not made a ridiculous reaching catch. Granted, the defender would have been out of bounds when he touched the ball.

The more I watch this clip, the more I think it should have been offensive interference, if anything. Beckham pretty much threw Carr down by the arm... which is why Carr was falling.

Iholdthepain wrote:

Fuck You Jobu wrote:

Iholdthepain wrote:

Fuck You Jobu wrote:

Iholdthepain wrote:

Fuck You Jobu wrote:Liked this version

Great catch, bs interference call, though.

I can see why it was called. There was contact and the defender was completely out of control. Since he wasn't in control of his body, he couldn't make a play on the ball. No play on the ball + contact = interference.

according to the rule, if the defender is looking back and trying to make a play on the ball, he has as much right to get into position as the receiver... but whatevs. It's the most difficult call to make in football, and Cowboys won anyway.

Since he was falling and never really that close to the ball - much less making a play on it, my guess would be that is why it was called.

True, but did he even touch the receiver, much less interfere? Looks iffy to me.

It was actually a pretty accurate adjustment read on the ball if you look at where the ball was coming down... That Cowboys defender was in good position to catch the ball had the receiver not made a ridiculous reaching catch. Granted, the defender would have been out of bounds when he touched the ball.

The more I watch this clip, the more I think it should have been offensive interference, if anything. Beckham pretty much threw Carr down by the arm... which is why Carr was falling.

Got it Homer!

Iholdthepain wrote:

Fuck You Jobu wrote:

Iholdthepain wrote:

Fuck You Jobu wrote:

Iholdthepain wrote:

Fuck You Jobu wrote:Liked this version

Great catch, bs interference call, though.

I can see why it was called. There was contact and the defender was completely out of control. Since he wasn't in control of his body, he couldn't make a play on the ball. No play on the ball + contact = interference.

according to the rule, if the defender is looking back and trying to make a play on the ball, he has as much right to get into position as the receiver... but whatevs. It's the most difficult call to make in football, and Cowboys won anyway.

Since he was falling and never really that close to the ball - much less making a play on it, my guess would be that is why it was called.

True, but did he even touch the receiver, much less interfere? Looks iffy to me.

It was actually a pretty accurate adjustment read on the ball if you look at where the ball was coming down... That Cowboys defender was in good position to catch the ball had the receiver not made a ridiculous reaching catch. Granted, the defender would have been out of bounds when he touched the ball.

The more I watch this clip, the more I think it should have been offensive interference, if anything. Beckham pretty much threw Carr down by the arm... which is why Carr was falling.

no offense, but what the hell are you watching? pass interference was called b/c the guy on the cowboys grabbed beckhams left arm before he fell. there was also no way the guy on the cowboys was gonna make a catch, unless you think he's gonna catch the ball in his facemask. #39 has his hand on the ground breaking his fall while beckham is leaping up for the ball.

thip, you say you dont care abot the Cowboys anymore, but you are clearly a Cowboys homer.

I'm a Cowboys fan and I thought it was pretty clear interference by Carr.

I really like the way the Cowboys have put together their offense this year. No one is playing over their head so you have guys like Beasley who can just sit back and make plays when their number is called. And we're seeing how good Romo can be when he consistenly has a lot of time to throw. It's good stuff.

God bless Richard Sherman and Doug Baldwin. One of the funniest and most on-point things I've ever seen.

http://deadspin.com/richard-sherman-moc ... 1663377486

yeah that was great.

Thats excellent, it won't matter, but it's great

On another note...

Hoo boy, even the feel good story of Leah Still could backfire...

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/i-tea ... -1.2024259

Exclusive: Cincinnati Bengals' Devon Still hasn't paid child support in months, says mother of cancer-stricken Leah Still

warehouse wrote:

Iholdthepain wrote:

Fuck You Jobu wrote:

Iholdthepain wrote:

Fuck You Jobu wrote:

Iholdthepain wrote:

Fuck You Jobu wrote:Liked this version

Great catch, bs interference call, though.

I can see why it was called. There was contact and the defender was completely out of control. Since he wasn't in control of his body, he couldn't make a play on the ball. No play on the ball + contact = interference.

according to the rule, if the defender is looking back and trying to make a play on the ball, he has as much right to get into position as the receiver... but whatevs. It's the most difficult call to make in football, and Cowboys won anyway.

Since he was falling and never really that close to the ball - much less making a play on it, my guess would be that is why it was called.

True, but did he even touch the receiver, much less interfere? Looks iffy to me.

It was actually a pretty accurate adjustment read on the ball if you look at where the ball was coming down... That Cowboys defender was in good position to catch the ball had the receiver not made a ridiculous reaching catch. Granted, the defender would have been out of bounds when he touched the ball.

The more I watch this clip, the more I think it should have been offensive interference, if anything. Beckham pretty much threw Carr down by the arm... which is why Carr was falling.

no offense, but what the hell are you watching? pass interference was called b/c the guy on the cowboys grabbed beckhams left arm before he fell. there was also no way the guy on the cowboys was gonna make a catch, unless you think he's gonna catch the ball in his facemask. #39 has his hand on the ground breaking his fall while beckham is leaping up for the ball.

None taken. I didn't think there was any way in hell ANY player would catch that ball... but Beckham did.

Still, looks to me like Beckham shoved Carr down by the arm more than the incidental contact Carr made.

E.H. Ruddock wrote:thip, you say you dont care abot the Cowboys anymore, but you are clearly a Cowboys homer.

I don't care like the mad fanatic I used to be... Too much energy and disappointment wasted.

Still a homer, though, for sure.

Happy T-Giv...

Go Cowboys!!!

Green Habit wrote:On another note...

i know. people who dont waste their time on a quasi-pearl jam related message board actually like it. who would have thought?

I am thankful for that last pick Cutler just threw. Serves them right for running that play at all.