Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85142
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Everybody calm down.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36752
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
You calm down, geek sheep!
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85142
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35416
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
This argument appears to come down to whether or not you are in the star wars camp, or feel its a PRAMG.
Team Lucasfilm. These bums had no business making a Han Solo movie.
FTR: I dont want a Han Solo movie.
Alas....
Team Lucasfilm. These bums had no business making a Han Solo movie.
FTR: I dont want a Han Solo movie.
Alas....
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
I want a Han Solo Movie. I want a Boba Fett movie. I want a Pong Krell Movie and a Chopper Movie. I want them to make a star wars movie for all of everything and I want to watch all of them.
More Star Wars More Better.
More Star Wars More Better.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 43421
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
I agree with LV...They were making their movie, they were working to have whatever they wanted to...I saw Rogue One again and the reshoots en reediting of that mess is so fuckin noticeable i dont understand why they hire directors if they dont care about their artistic input...all they want is to play safe specially because audiences are so fucking numb all they want is a copy of a copy. Thats it.
Oh and fucking funko toys.
Oh and fucking funko toys.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35416
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
I want all of those except Han. I dont need to know his backstory. He's cool AF regardless.@SkitchP wrote:I want a Han Solo Movie. I want a Boba Fett movie. I want a Pong Krell Movie and a Chopper Movie. I want them to make a star wars movie for all of everything and I want to watch all of them.
More Star Wars More Better.
But, yes, more star wars. I hope this movie turns out great because I need more Star Wars to put on at the end of the day.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Strat wrote:I want all of those except Han. I dont need to know his backstory. He's cool AF regardless.@SkitchP wrote:I want a Han Solo Movie. I want a Boba Fett movie. I want a Pong Krell Movie and a Chopper Movie. I want them to make a star wars movie for all of everything and I want to watch all of them.
More Star Wars More Better.
But, yes, more star wars. I hope this movie turns out great because I need more Star Wars to put on at the end of the day.
Honestly, I hope this movie ISNT a backstory as much as a "Wacky Adventures of Han Solo" type thing.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
@SkitchP wrote:Strat wrote:I want all of those except Han. I dont need to know his backstory. He's cool AF regardless.@SkitchP wrote:I want a Han Solo Movie. I want a Boba Fett movie. I want a Pong Krell Movie and a Chopper Movie. I want them to make a star wars movie for all of everything and I want to watch all of them.
More Star Wars More Better.
But, yes, more star wars. I hope this movie turns out great because I need more Star Wars to put on at the end of the day.
Honestly, I hope this movie ISNT a backstory as much as a "Wacky Adventures ofHan SoloAce Ventura" type thing.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85142
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
You and (especially) LV have a director's bias. And there's nothing wrong with that. I can totally understand why you're taking the position you're taking here. I have a writer's bias, admittedly. So, of course, I'm going to side more with Disney here. Because as much as I want a director to have a vision and to be able to exercise their creativity on a project, I also believe that film is collaborative. And the writer's work is important, too. Especially on a project like this. These are established characters in some established worlds. It's far more important to be true to the characters here. To listen to them and let them dictate. To me, that's far more important than whatever wack-a-do concept Lord and Miller may have had. They agreed to join a project that already has established mythology and tradition. I'm fine with expanding that mythology and changing the rules of that tradition but it can't be done in a vacuum.VinylGuy wrote:I agree with LV...They were making their movie, they were working to have whatever they wanted to...I saw Rogue One again and the reshoots en reediting of that mess is so fuckin noticeable i dont understand why they hire directors if they dont care about their artistic input...all they want is to play safe specially because audiences are so fucking numb all they want is a copy of a copy. Thats it.
Oh and fucking funko toys.
I'd be on L&M's side if this was their own original concept. In that case, absolutely! Let them have complete control. Let them piss their vision all over everything and everyone; mark their territory and demand obedience. This is different.
If Lord and Miller want to make a gonzo slapstick space comedy, then good on them. They should go make that movie. And if/when they do, they should have complete creative control and freedom.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85142
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Agreed. I'm done with less backstory/exposition and more adventuring.@SkitchP wrote:Strat wrote:I want all of those except Han. I dont need to know his backstory. He's cool AF regardless.@SkitchP wrote:I want a Han Solo Movie. I want a Boba Fett movie. I want a Pong Krell Movie and a Chopper Movie. I want them to make a star wars movie for all of everything and I want to watch all of them.
More Star Wars More Better.
But, yes, more star wars. I hope this movie turns out great because I need more Star Wars to put on at the end of the day.
Honestly, I hope this movie ISNT a backstory as much as a "Wacky Adventures of Han Solo" type thing.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Screenwriters are worthless dogshit, accept it
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35416
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Im all for them to make a star wars movie about a new character or new world within Star Wars. But yes, rearranging a character to fit their mold (which i have a feeling is a very one dimensional approach to story telling) then i say GTFO.durdencommatyler wrote:You and (especially) LV have a director's bias. And there's nothing wrong with that. I can totally understand why you're taking the position you're taking here. I have a writer's bias, admittedly. So, of course, I'm going to side more with Disney here. Because as much as I want a director to have a vision and to be able to exercise their creativity on a project, I also believe that film is collaborative. And the writer's work is important, too. Especially on a project like this. These are established characters in some established worlds. It's far more important to be true to the characters here. To listen to them and let them dictate. To me, that's far more important than whatever wack-a-do concept Lord and Miller may have had. They agreed to join a project that already has established mythology and tradition. I'm fine with expanding that mythology and changing the rules of that tradition but it can't be done in a vacuum.VinylGuy wrote:I agree with LV...They were making their movie, they were working to have whatever they wanted to...I saw Rogue One again and the reshoots en reediting of that mess is so fuckin noticeable i dont understand why they hire directors if they dont care about their artistic input...all they want is to play safe specially because audiences are so fucking numb all they want is a copy of a copy. Thats it.
Oh and fucking funko toys.
I'd be on L&M's side if this was their own original concept. In that case, absolutely! Let them have complete control. Let them piss their vision all over everything and everyone; mark their territory and demand obedience. This is different.
If Lord and Miller want to make a gonzo slapstick space comedy, then good on them. They should go make that movie. And if/when they do, they should have complete creative control and freedom.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35416
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Screenwriters are worthless dogshit, accept it
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85142
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHLoathedVermin72 wrote:Screenwriters are worthless dogshit, accept it
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85142
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Exactly.Strat wrote:Im all for them to make a star wars movie about a new character or new world within Star Wars. But yes, rearranging a character to fit their mold (which i have a feeling is a very one dimensional approach to story telling) then i say GTFO.durdencommatyler wrote:You and (especially) LV have a director's bias. And there's nothing wrong with that. I can totally understand why you're taking the position you're taking here. I have a writer's bias, admittedly. So, of course, I'm going to side more with Disney here. Because as much as I want a director to have a vision and to be able to exercise their creativity on a project, I also believe that film is collaborative. And the writer's work is important, too. Especially on a project like this. These are established characters in some established worlds. It's far more important to be true to the characters here. To listen to them and let them dictate. To me, that's far more important than whatever wack-a-do concept Lord and Miller may have had. They agreed to join a project that already has established mythology and tradition. I'm fine with expanding that mythology and changing the rules of that tradition but it can't be done in a vacuum.VinylGuy wrote:I agree with LV...They were making their movie, they were working to have whatever they wanted to...I saw Rogue One again and the reshoots en reediting of that mess is so fuckin noticeable i dont understand why they hire directors if they dont care about their artistic input...all they want is to play safe specially because audiences are so fucking numb all they want is a copy of a copy. Thats it.
Oh and fucking funko toys.
I'd be on L&M's side if this was their own original concept. In that case, absolutely! Let them have complete control. Let them piss their vision all over everything and everyone; mark their territory and demand obedience. This is different.
If Lord and Miller want to make a gonzo slapstick space comedy, then good on them. They should go make that movie. And if/when they do, they should have complete creative control and freedom.
If no bridges were actually burned on either side, I'd love to see Lord and Miller come back some day and tell their version of a Star Wars story that involves new characters, characters they get to help create and design and takes place in a time/place/land that's fresh and calling for exploration.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 43421
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Joey, you realize that ¨fresh and exploration¨ is not something that ´ll happen with a brand like SW right? They had that opportunity with Rogue One and they did re shoots and redited the movie because the tone was too dark or something. They even put R2 there.durdencommatyler wrote:Exactly.Strat wrote:Im all for them to make a star wars movie about a new character or new world within Star Wars. But yes, rearranging a character to fit their mold (which i have a feeling is a very one dimensional approach to story telling) then i say GTFO.durdencommatyler wrote:You and (especially) LV have a director's bias. And there's nothing wrong with that. I can totally understand why you're taking the position you're taking here. I have a writer's bias, admittedly. So, of course, I'm going to side more with Disney here. Because as much as I want a director to have a vision and to be able to exercise their creativity on a project, I also believe that film is collaborative. And the writer's work is important, too. Especially on a project like this. These are established characters in some established worlds. It's far more important to be true to the characters here. To listen to them and let them dictate. To me, that's far more important than whatever wack-a-do concept Lord and Miller may have had. They agreed to join a project that already has established mythology and tradition. I'm fine with expanding that mythology and changing the rules of that tradition but it can't be done in a vacuum.VinylGuy wrote:I agree with LV...They were making their movie, they were working to have whatever they wanted to...I saw Rogue One again and the reshoots en reediting of that mess is so fuckin noticeable i dont understand why they hire directors if they dont care about their artistic input...all they want is to play safe specially because audiences are so fucking numb all they want is a copy of a copy. Thats it.
Oh and fucking funko toys.
I'd be on L&M's side if this was their own original concept. In that case, absolutely! Let them have complete control. Let them piss their vision all over everything and everyone; mark their territory and demand obedience. This is different.
If Lord and Miller want to make a gonzo slapstick space comedy, then good on them. They should go make that movie. And if/when they do, they should have complete creative control and freedom.
If no bridges were actually burned on either side, I'd love to see Lord and Miller come back some day and tell their version of a Star Wars story that involves new characters, characters they get to help create and design and takes place in a time/place/land that's fresh and calling for exploration.
I guess the worst part of this is the overall feeling i have that this is a waste of time. The movie, the fans, the trailers..is just a waste of time. There will be nothing new here, its just a big fan service...and when it feels there could be a new angle, its taken down...All i really care about SW is episode 8.
I was against a Solo origin movie anyway.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85142
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Okay, well, you clearly know more about it than us geek sheep.
And, yeah, I'm way more excited about The Last Jedi than I am about Han Solo. That hasn't changed.
And, yeah, I'm way more excited about The Last Jedi than I am about Han Solo. That hasn't changed.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
For the record, I absolutely love Rogue One. It's a miracle that movie happened.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85142
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Nope. It wasn't fresh or interesting it all. It was edited and reshot to be just like every other Star Wars movie. It offered nothing new. It was a pointless film with no redeeming value. They even put R2 there!LoathedVermin72 wrote:For the record, I absolutely love Rogue One. It's a miracle that movie happened.