Red Mosquito

Mickey wrote:How far into the future do you think Crenshaw can see?

However far it is, it's not in 3D.

macphisto wrote:I'm all about election integrity.

Was it about Emmy integrity when Trump said they rigged it against The Apprentice?
Was it about election integrity when Trump said some of the 2016 primaries were rigged against him?
Was it about election integrity when Trump tried to pretend that he got more total votes than Hilary in 2016?
Was it about integrity all those other times he ignored reality so he could claim to be a winner in some situation?

Why on earth would you give him and his flunkeys any credibility about something like this?

Bi_3 wrote:My understanding is that what they are doing is legal. Shitty and pathetic, but legal.

Sure, but that doesn’t mean it’s the right thing to do. The potential damage of dragging our democratic process through the mud and causing chaos at the highest levels of government during a critical time for our country is completely disproportionate to the insanely low chances that any fraud found would overturn ballot margins into the tens of thousands. It’s completely ridiculous.

VinylGuy wrote:So far what Trump is doing is embarrassing for him and his legacy, whatever that is.

i honestly do not believe he can make his legacy any more of a joke than it is now (course every time i thought he sunk his lowest he surprised me)


its funny the MAGA crowd has shirts fuck your feelings about the dems who questioned the legitimacy of 2016 but now that the maga crowd is questioning the election results its all about ensuring integrity

Peeps wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:So far what Trump is doing is embarrassing for him and his legacy, whatever that is.

i honestly do not believe he can make his legacy any more of a joke than it is now (course every time i thought he sunk his lowest he surprised me)


its funny the MAGA crowd has shirts fuck your feelings about the dems who questioned the legitimacy of 2016 but now that the maga crowd is questioning the election results its all about ensuring integrity

No one has been right about the bolded for a long time, but I suppose it has to end sometime.

spike wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:My understanding is that what they are doing is legal. Shitty and pathetic, but legal.

Sure, but that doesn’t mean it’s the right thing to do. The potential damage of dragging our democratic process through the mud and causing chaos at the highest levels of government during a critical time for our country is completely disproportionate to the insanely low chances that any fraud found would overturn ballot margins into the tens of thousands. It’s completely ridiculous.

It's not that they're looking into it. Fine, whatever, make sure everything is kosher. Thats not what they are doing. They are sowing distrust, have given no actual proof, and are doing this to absolutely steal an election.

spike wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:My understanding is that what they are doing is legal. Shitty and pathetic, but legal.

Sure, but that doesn’t mean it’s the right thing to do. The potential damage of dragging our democratic process through the mud and causing chaos at the highest levels of government during a critical time for our country is completely disproportionate to the insanely low chances that any fraud found would overturn ballot margins into the tens of thousands. It’s completely ridiculous.

Lol it's like no one remembers four years ago.

Who gives a shit about any of this omg go outside

Strat wrote:

spike wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:My understanding is that what they are doing is legal. Shitty and pathetic, but legal.

Sure, but that doesn’t mean it’s the right thing to do. The potential damage of dragging our democratic process through the mud and causing chaos at the highest levels of government during a critical time for our country is completely disproportionate to the insanely low chances that any fraud found would overturn ballot margins into the tens of thousands. It’s completely ridiculous.

It's not that they're looking into it. Fine, whatever, make sure everything is kosher. Thats not what they are doing. They are sowing distrust, have given no actual proof, and are doing this to absolutely steal an election.

Two words: Muh Russians.

BurtReynolds wrote:

spike wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:My understanding is that what they are doing is legal. Shitty and pathetic, but legal.

Sure, but that doesn’t mean it’s the right thing to do. The potential damage of dragging our democratic process through the mud and causing chaos at the highest levels of government during a critical time for our country is completely disproportionate to the insanely low chances that any fraud found would overturn ballot margins into the tens of thousands. It’s completely ridiculous.

Lol it's like no one remembers four years ago.

Who gives a shit about any of this omg go outside

It’s cool that you just assume I think the Ruskies interfered last time.

sowing distrust omg what is this new phenomena someone please explain it to me I've never heard of this happening before a week ago

spike wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

spike wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:My understanding is that what they are doing is legal. Shitty and pathetic, but legal.

Sure, but that doesn’t mean it’s the right thing to do. The potential damage of dragging our democratic process through the mud and causing chaos at the highest levels of government during a critical time for our country is completely disproportionate to the insanely low chances that any fraud found would overturn ballot margins into the tens of thousands. It’s completely ridiculous.

Lol it's like no one remembers four years ago.

Who gives a shit about any of this omg go outside

It’s cool that you just assume I think the Ruskies interfered last time.

I do wonder if it would be better if the country just ignored it.

I think a big part of this is just Trump wanting to fundraise off these lawsuits.
Some of the suits are just... ???
Frank is no liberal stooge.

BurtReynolds wrote:sowing distrust omg what is this new phenomena someone please explain it to me I've never heard of this happening before a week ago

bit different when it’s coming from the sitting president, wouldn’t you say?

I can't say I'm in the least surprised by Trump's reaction to the election. What does surprise me however is the number of republicans sticking with the sinking ship and pushing with this rigged election narrative instead of trying to protect their own legacy and distance themselves from the crazy-man

BurtReynolds wrote:Lol it's like no one remembers four years ago.

By this point in 2016 Hillary Clinton had conceded the election and Joe Biden had met with Mike Pence in the White House to discuss transition details. Obama had ordered the personnel office to cease vetting appointees for all departments, and the budget office to await Donald Trump’s guidance. None of those things have happened here, and nobody expects them to happen in the next few weeks.

But you’re right, it is amusing to imagine what the response would have been if Hillary had flatly refused to concede, the Democratic Party had gone along with it, and John Kerry had responded to questions by joking that there would be “a peaceful transition to a Hillary Clinton White House,” then storming off while refusing to say what guidance he was giving his department.

McParadigm wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:Lol it's like no one remembers four years ago.

By this point in 2016 Hillary Clinton had conceded the election and Joe Biden had met with Mike Pence in the White House to discuss transition details. Obama had ordered the personnel office to cease vetting appointees for all departments, and the budget office to await Donald Trump’s guidance. None of those things have happened here, and nobody expects them to happen in the next few weeks.

But you’re right, it is amusing to imagine what the response would have been if Hillary had flatly refused to concede, the Democratic Party had gone along with it, and John Kerry had responded to questions by joking that there would be “a peaceful transition to a Hillary Clinton White House,” then storming off while refusing to say what guidance he was giving his department.

So funny!

Rangi Guy wrote:I can't say I'm in the least surprised by Trump's reaction to the election. What does surprise me however is the number of republicans sticking with the sinking ship and pushing with this rigged election narrative instead of trying to protect their own legacy and distance themselves from the crazy-man

Legacy nonsense triggers my gag reflex like no other. Legacy as decided by who?

I thought we actually got Burt to go outside.

Democratic wins are illegitimate by way of being Democratic wins.

McParadigm wrote:By this point in 2016 Hillary Clinton had conceded the election and Joe Biden had met with Mike Pence in the White House to discuss transition details. Obama had ordered the personnel office to cease vetting appointees for all departments, and the budget office to await Donald Trump’s guidance. None of those things have happened here, and nobody expects them to happen in the next few weeks.

Additional: