Red Mosquito

spike wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:sowing distrust omg what is this new phenomena someone please explain it to me I've never heard of this happening before a week ago

bit different when it’s coming from the sitting president, wouldn’t you say?

Not really, except to say the sitting president probably doesn't have the reach that the forces almost singularly obsessed with delegitimizing him had in 2017-18.

Though if I'm being consistent I have to cheer on any attempts to sow mistrust for government.

I think Trump will whine and sue his way all the way back to Mar A Lago, but won't do much else. He doesn't have the stomach for anything beyond that. Some of the crazier supporters might though, but I'd wait to freak out about that until it actually happens.

washing machine wrote:

Mickey wrote:How far into the future do you think Crenshaw can see?

Good question. On that same note, what's the lowest hanging fruit your short lil' self can grab?

Unclear. I think this topic has a lot of depth and I, for one, am excited to see how it goes.

Lol @ democracy

has this one been brought up yet?

Mickey wrote:

washing machine wrote:

Mickey wrote:How far into the future do you think Crenshaw can see?

Good question. On that same note, what's the lowest hanging fruit your short lil' self can grab?

Unclear. I think this topic has a lot of depth and I, for one, am excited to see how it goes.

This gets funnier the more I read it.

macphisto wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:

macphisto wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:Mac, cmon he lost.

Let's make sure of that.

but why? i mean there isnt proof that says otherwise. Did he present any kind of proof?

Why ensure the election results are accurate? Really?

There 100+ sworn affidavits citing fraud, tampering, and/or obstruction.

Hey so funny thing about one of those sworn affidavits...
By the way, if you're keeping score at home, this means that there is currently a higher rate of affidavit fraud than voter fraud.

Mickey wrote:

macphisto wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:

macphisto wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:Mac, cmon he lost.

Let's make sure of that.

but why? i mean there isnt proof that says otherwise. Did he present any kind of proof?

Why ensure the election results are accurate? Really?

There 100+ sworn affidavits citing fraud, tampering, and/or obstruction.

Hey so funny thing about one of those sworn affidavits...

By the way, if you're keeping score at home, this means that there is currently a higher rate of affidavit fraud than voter fraud.

WINNING!

oh come on!

The guy was paid 130k to lie according to the washington post.

Mickey wrote:

macphisto wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:

macphisto wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:Mac, cmon he lost.

Let's make sure of that.

but why? i mean there isnt proof that says otherwise. Did he present any kind of proof?

Why ensure the election results are accurate? Really?

There 100+ sworn affidavits citing fraud, tampering, and/or obstruction.

Hey so funny thing about one of those sworn affidavits...

By the way, if you're keeping score at home, this means that there is currently a higher rate of affidavit fraud than voter fraud.

Your brain has more holes in it than a big ass brick of Swiss cheese.

based latinos take no shit. (don't know if the tweet is accurate, but that's the video. )

Driver cited for causing crash during Trump support rally in Santa Maria

https://santamariatimes.com/news/local/ ... 6ab64.html

macphisto wrote:

Mickey wrote:

macphisto wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:

macphisto wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:Mac, cmon he lost.

Let's make sure of that.

but why? i mean there isnt proof that says otherwise. Did he present any kind of proof?

Why ensure the election results are accurate? Really?

There 100+ sworn affidavits citing fraud, tampering, and/or obstruction.

Hey so funny thing about one of those sworn affidavits...

By the way, if you're keeping score at home, this means that there is currently a higher rate of affidavit fraud than voter fraud.

Your brain has more holes in it than a big ass brick of Swiss cheese.

Oh, sorry, was this not one of the sworn affidavits you had in mind?

BurtReynolds wrote:based latinos take no shit.

(don't know if the tweet is accurate, but that's the video. )

Driver cited for causing crash during Trump support rally in Santa Maria

https://santamariatimes.com/news/local/ ... 6ab64.html

He's lucky, BLM or Antifa would've stomped him out long before help arrived.

macphisto wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:based latinos take no shit.

(don't know if the tweet is accurate, but that's the video. )

Driver cited for causing crash during Trump support rally in Santa Maria

https://santamariatimes.com/news/local/ ... 6ab64.html

He's lucky, BLM or Antifa would've stomped him out long before help arrived.

How would you have handled the situation mac?

Mickey wrote:

macphisto wrote:

Mickey wrote:

macphisto wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:

macphisto wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:Mac, cmon he lost.

Let's make sure of that.

but why? i mean there isnt proof that says otherwise. Did he present any kind of proof?

Why ensure the election results are accurate? Really?

There 100+ sworn affidavits citing fraud, tampering, and/or obstruction.

Hey so funny thing about one of those sworn affidavits...

By the way, if you're keeping score at home, this means that there is currently a higher rate of affidavit fraud than voter fraud.

Your brain has more holes in it than a big ass brick of Swiss cheese.

Oh, sorry, was this not one of the sworn affidavits you had in mind?

He meant all the legal affidavits that will be in Trump's favor. Duh.

verb_to_trust wrote:

macphisto wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:based latinos take no shit.

(don't know if the tweet is accurate, but that's the video. )

Driver cited for causing crash during Trump support rally in Santa Maria

https://santamariatimes.com/news/local/ ... 6ab64.html

He's lucky, BLM or Antifa would've stomped him out long before help arrived.

How would you have handled the situation mac?

Gun to head. Make him beg for his life.

I definitely think you should put a gun to your head.

Mickey wrote:I definitely think you should put a gun to your head.

hmmm..... quoted for future generations

Bi_3 wrote:

Mickey wrote:I definitely think you should put a gun to your head.

hmmm..... quoted for future generations

Oh no, not the valiant honor of the Mickey account.

BurtReynolds wrote:based latinos take no shit.

(don't know if the tweet is accurate, but that's the video. )

Driver cited for causing crash during Trump support rally in Santa Maria

https://santamariatimes.com/news/local/ ... 6ab64.html

I was in that general area not too long ago. Saw a lot of thin blue line flags. Couldn't figure whether it was a local thing or is this just how righties signal their tribal affiliation nation wide. Anyone else have anectdotes regarding thin blue line flags in their local area?