Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Posted: Wed September 18, 2013 9:22 pm
E.H. Ruddock wrote:The more I listen to it the more I like it.
This song is pissing me off.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:The more I listen to it the more I like it.
This song is pissing me off.
What more could you want after Wrigley? Shit was hot fire.BurtReynolds wrote:Think we'll ever get a non-BO'B semen encrusted version of LB one day?
so is this another reason we should be mad at BoB?Chris_H_2 wrote:I must admit: Sirens live version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sirens studio version
maybe one that wasn't performed in a thunderstorm at 1 in the morning. I meant the album though.harmless wrote:What more could you want after Wrigley? Shit was hot fire.BurtReynolds wrote:Think we'll ever get a non-BO'B semen encrusted version of LB one day?
This makes it unequivocally rubbish.Fuzzcharger wrote:Based on anecdotal evidence I.e. posts on the PJ Facebook page, Sirens seems most popular with women aged 25 - 45.
I don't think its that much betterstip wrote:so is this another reason we should be mad at BoB?Chris_H_2 wrote:I must admit: Sirens live version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sirens studio version
stip wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:The more I listen to it the more I like it.
This song is pissing me off.
Well, people also deified the televised live takes of Backspacer, S/T, Riot Act and Binaural, so probably not...stip wrote:so is this another reason we should be mad at BoB?Chris_H_2 wrote:I must admit: Sirens live version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sirens studio version
It's excremental better . . .Thejambi wrote:I don't think its that much betterstip wrote:so is this another reason we should be mad at BoB?Chris_H_2 wrote:I must admit: Sirens live version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sirens studio version
It has more faults than redeeming qualities imo.Thejambi wrote:I don't think its that much betterstip wrote:so is this another reason we should be mad at BoB?Chris_H_2 wrote:I must admit: Sirens live version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sirens studio version
These people also like to refer to the band as "the boys". For example "another great song by the boys".harmless wrote:This makes it unequivocally rubbish.Fuzzcharger wrote:Based on anecdotal evidence I.e. posts on the PJ Facebook page, Sirens seems most popular with women aged 25 - 45.
These people? Who, women aged 25-45?Fuzzcharger wrote:These people also like to refer to the band as "the boys". For example "another great song by the boys".harmless wrote:This makes it unequivocally rubbish.Fuzzcharger wrote:Based on anecdotal evidence I.e. posts on the PJ Facebook page, Sirens seems most popular with women aged 25 - 45.
Yes, these Facebook people.harmless wrote:These people? Who, women aged 25-45?Fuzzcharger wrote:These people also like to refer to the band as "the boys". For example "another great song by the boys".harmless wrote:This makes it unequivocally rubbish.Fuzzcharger wrote:Based on anecdotal evidence I.e. posts on the PJ Facebook page, Sirens seems most popular with women aged 25 - 45.
nuff saidFuzzcharger wrote:Facebook people.