Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Mon April 11, 2016 10:42 pm
Simple Torture wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:He can do a lot of damage just growing his lightsaber
Damn my enthusiastic posting
Simple Torture wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:He can do a lot of damage just growing his lightsaber
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Mecca wrote:A blind guy training stormtroopers sure answers a lot of questions
I watched like 1/3 of it on HBO recently. Not reallystip wrote:Has spaceballs held up?
My kids (9 and 7) laughed their asses off.Simple Torture wrote:I watched like 1/3 of it on HBO recently. Not reallystip wrote:Has spaceballs held up?
Was thinking about watching this with my step-sons at some pointB wrote:My kids (9 and 7) laughed their asses off.Simple Torture wrote:I watched like 1/3 of it on HBO recently. Not reallystip wrote:Has spaceballs held up?
9-12 is probably the perfect age for it; the dick jokes aren't too-too dirty so you don't mind them seeing it, and the meta-jokes are simple enough that they can understand them. And if they've seen Star Wars, all the better.B wrote:My kids (9 and 7) laughed their asses off.Simple Torture wrote:I watched like 1/3 of it on HBO recently. Not reallystip wrote:Has spaceballs held up?
Training? Like acting classes?dimejinky99 wrote:Oh wow
Re Hayden Christensen.
He was flown to the UK last year and trainers were hired. It looks to me like he was cast but now this late in the game they have a new Vader cast, his contribution has been dropped.
Citizen Dick wrote:I've only been able to skim the last 15 pages. Did you guys discuss this? It dovetails heavily into the speculation about what Rey 2.0s character is about.durdencommatyler wrote:Do we know who Mads is playing? IMDB's got a big fat blank next to his name.
- Spoiler: show
Because you are a terrible father who has yet to learn any lessonE.H. Ruddock wrote:why does everything in Star Wars have to be about a good parent/bad child or bad parent/good child?
I'm ready to move on from that trope as much as the next guy. But if it works, I don't really care. Eventually, enough of these will make a billion dollars that they'll feel comfortable abandoning all the worn "tried and true" stuff and get on with something totally different.E.H. Ruddock wrote:why does everything in Star Wars have to be about a good parent/bad child or bad parent/good child?
Or keep on sticking with what works and making trillions of dollarsdurdencommatyler wrote:I'm ready to move on from that trope as much as the next guy. But if it works, I don't really care. Eventually, enough of these will make a billion dollars that they'll feel comfortable abandoning all the worn "tried and true" stuff and get on with something totally different.E.H. Ruddock wrote:why does everything in Star Wars have to be about a good parent/bad child or bad parent/good child?
Strat wrote:Or keep on sticking with what works and making trillions of dollarsdurdencommatyler wrote:I'm ready to move on from that trope as much as the next guy. But if it works, I don't really care. Eventually, enough of these will make a billion dollars that they'll feel comfortable abandoning all the worn "tried and true" stuff and get on with something totally different.E.H. Ruddock wrote:why does everything in Star Wars have to be about a good parent/bad child or bad parent/good child?
Eh. Its still Disney, It's still Star Wars, it's still sci fi adventure. I know you love the director but ultimately its under the Star Wars umbrella. I do think it will be a bit darker than TFA, but the first TFA trailer also was much more intense and darker than the film turned out to be.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I mean, yeah, it obviously contains familiar iconography and references. But I have a feeling this movie's tone is going to be truly different from any of the other SW movies so far. Much grimmer. Let's just say I don't see anyone making nervous "Do you have a boyfriend?" quips to Erso.