Page 50 of 346

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Posted: Sat October 11, 2014 3:27 am
by malice
god almighty how I despise life in 2014 :?

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Posted: Mon October 13, 2014 2:58 pm
by Fuck You Jobu
Whitey McTeeth wrote:What happens if the dog spots you spotting it?
Do I run away, or keep spotting?
Suicide by Copdog?

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Posted: Tue October 14, 2014 2:42 am
by Bammer
Strat wrote:Jennifer lawrence is incredibly naturally beautiful. God bless her. I would give anything to stuff her in my pocket, take her home with me, cuddle her and buy her presents.
What about Hope Solo?

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Posted: Wed October 15, 2014 3:55 pm
by Fuck You Jobu

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Posted: Wed October 15, 2014 6:13 pm
by Alex
go broncos

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Posted: Wed October 15, 2014 6:57 pm
by dimejinky99
This is a blind leap into a bucket of bullshit on an Orwellian level.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... ebook-post

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Posted: Wed October 15, 2014 8:54 pm
by Fuck You Jobu
dimejinky99 wrote:This is a blind leap into a bucket of bullshit on an Orwellian level.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... ebook-post
This should prob go in the Middle East thread.

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Posted: Thu October 16, 2014 8:39 pm
by Rangi Guy

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Posted: Fri October 17, 2014 4:41 pm
by Fuck You Jobu

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Posted: Fri October 17, 2014 4:51 pm
by Alex
dude they must have said farts like five times in that article

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Posted: Sat October 18, 2014 2:20 pm
by dimejinky99
Surely this will be put to military use first?
http://inhabitat.com/lockheed-martin-an ... ar-fusion/

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Posted: Mon October 20, 2014 10:01 pm
by Rangi Guy

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Posted: Tue October 28, 2014 8:12 pm
by broken iris
The University of Montreal has found that men who had sex with more than 20 women lower their prostate cancer risk:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/scie ... -find.html

"Honey, my PSA came back a little off... "

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Posted: Tue October 28, 2014 9:04 pm
by Norah
I didn't read the study, but does it have to do with the different women, or simply that men who had sex with 20+ women have sex in general with greater frequency?

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Posted: Tue October 28, 2014 10:18 pm
by LoathedVermin72
cutuphalfdead wrote:I didn't read the study, but does it have to do with the different women, or simply that men who had sex with 20+ women have sex in general with greater frequency?
This was my first thought too.

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Posted: Tue October 28, 2014 10:30 pm
by McParadigm
Did the results change if they took a breather after the first ten?

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Posted: Wed October 29, 2014 4:53 pm
by broken iris
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:I didn't read the study, but does it have to do with the different women, or simply that men who had sex with 20+ women have sex in general with greater frequency?
This was my first thought too.
I read the article, not the study, but my guess is that guys that who accomplish that are better looking (a sign of good health and genetics in general) and you would probably find they have lower occurrences of many diseases/cancers and it's not the amount of women you unload in that really matters.

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Posted: Wed October 29, 2014 4:58 pm
by LoathedVermin72
broken iris wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:I didn't read the study, but does it have to do with the different women, or simply that men who had sex with 20+ women have sex in general with greater frequency?
This was my first thought too.
I read the article, not the study, but my guess is that guys that who accomplish that are better looking (a sign of good health and genetics in general) and you would probably find they have lower occurrences of many diseases/cancers and it's not the amount of women you unload in that really matters.
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Besides, I've heard of other studies that indicated regular sex does lower one's risk of prostate cancer, so my guess would be the results are related.

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Posted: Wed October 29, 2014 5:01 pm
by broken iris
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
broken iris wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:I didn't read the study, but does it have to do with the different women, or simply that men who had sex with 20+ women have sex in general with greater frequency?
This was my first thought too.
I read the article, not the study, but my guess is that guys that who accomplish that are better looking (a sign of good health and genetics in general) and you would probably find they have lower occurrences of many diseases/cancers and it's not the amount of women you unload in that really matters.
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Besides, I've heard of other studies that indicated regular sex does lower one's risk of prostate cancer, so my guess would be the results are related.
Yes, I would agree, but the question is, is 1000 encounters with one person or 100 with 10 more or equally effective?

Re: Not worthy of a thread News

Posted: Wed October 29, 2014 5:02 pm
by Jorge
Let's find out.